Justice Barrett Declines to Recuse from Case of Koch-Funded Group case

[Swede]

“Justice Barrett is ignoring important ethical standards to rule on a case that could open our democracy to further infiltration by dark-money influence, perhaps permanently,” Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) told Forbes. “Her choice to press forward in spite of recusal laws also creates a troubling new precedent, and undermines public confidence in the integrity of the Court.”


https://lawandcrime.com/supreme-court/democrats-criticize-justice-barrett-for-declining-to-recuse-from-case-of-koch-funded-group-that-spent-heavily-on-ads-to-confirm-her/

[-misanthroptimist]

1. Barret, like so many conservatives, has no moral or ethical compass.

[CanonRay]

2. One would think the Chief Justice could force her to

for the good of the court

[TheBlackAdder]

3. Failure to recuse when there is a direct conflict of interest shows contempt for the court.

.

That alone should be grounds for removal.

.

[BradAllison]

4. Of course not

She's an immoral freakshow.