Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe New Right-Wing Bogeyman
The New Right-Wing Bogeyman
How conservative politicians and pundits became fixated on what has long been an academic theory
ADAM HARRIS
10:18 AM ET
On january 12, keith Ammon, a Republican member of the New Hampshire House of Representatives, introduced a bill that would bar schools as well as organizations that have entered into a contract or subcontract with the state from endorsing divisive concepts. Specifically, the measure would forbid race or sex scapegoating, questioning the value of meritocracy, and suggesting that New Hampshireor the United Statesis fundamentally racist.
Ammons bill is one of a dozen that Republicans have recently introduced in state legislatures and the United States Congress that contain similar prohibitions. In Arkansas, lawmakers have approved a measure that would ban state contractors from offering training that promotes division between, resentment of, or social justice for groups based on race, gender, or political affiliation. The Idaho legislature just passed a bill that would bar institutions of public education from compelling students to personally affirm, adopt, or adhere to specific beliefs about race, sex, or religion. The Louisiana legislature is weighing a nearly identical measure.
The language of these bills is anodyne and fuzzycompel, for instance, is never defined in the Idaho legislationand that ambiguity appears to be deliberate. According to Ammon, using taxpayer funds to promote ideas such as one race is inherently superior to another race or sex only exacerbates our differences. But critics of these efforts warn that the bills would effectively prevent public schools and universities from holding discussions about racism; the New Hampshire measure in particular would ban companies that do business with government entities from conducting diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. The vagueness of the language is really the point, Leah Cohen, an organizer with Granite State Progress, a liberal nonprofit based in Concord, told me. With this really broad brushstroke, we anticipate that that will be used more to censor conversations about race and equity.
Most legal scholars say that these bills impinge on the right to free speech and will likely be dismissed in court. Of the legislative language so far, none of the bills are fully constitutional, Joe Cohn, the legislative and policy director of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, told me, and if it isnt fully constitutional, theres a word for that: It means its unconstitutional. This does not appear to concern the bills sponsors, though. The larger purpose, it seems, is to rally the Republican baseto push back against the recent reexaminations of the role that slavery and segregation have played in American history and the attempts to redress those historical offenses. The shorthand for the Republicans bogeyman is an idea that has until now mostly lived in academia: critical race theory.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2021/05/gops-critical-race-theory-fixation-explained/618828/
How conservative politicians and pundits became fixated on what has long been an academic theory
ADAM HARRIS
10:18 AM ET
On january 12, keith Ammon, a Republican member of the New Hampshire House of Representatives, introduced a bill that would bar schools as well as organizations that have entered into a contract or subcontract with the state from endorsing divisive concepts. Specifically, the measure would forbid race or sex scapegoating, questioning the value of meritocracy, and suggesting that New Hampshireor the United Statesis fundamentally racist.
Ammons bill is one of a dozen that Republicans have recently introduced in state legislatures and the United States Congress that contain similar prohibitions. In Arkansas, lawmakers have approved a measure that would ban state contractors from offering training that promotes division between, resentment of, or social justice for groups based on race, gender, or political affiliation. The Idaho legislature just passed a bill that would bar institutions of public education from compelling students to personally affirm, adopt, or adhere to specific beliefs about race, sex, or religion. The Louisiana legislature is weighing a nearly identical measure.
The language of these bills is anodyne and fuzzycompel, for instance, is never defined in the Idaho legislationand that ambiguity appears to be deliberate. According to Ammon, using taxpayer funds to promote ideas such as one race is inherently superior to another race or sex only exacerbates our differences. But critics of these efforts warn that the bills would effectively prevent public schools and universities from holding discussions about racism; the New Hampshire measure in particular would ban companies that do business with government entities from conducting diversity, equity, and inclusion programs. The vagueness of the language is really the point, Leah Cohen, an organizer with Granite State Progress, a liberal nonprofit based in Concord, told me. With this really broad brushstroke, we anticipate that that will be used more to censor conversations about race and equity.
Most legal scholars say that these bills impinge on the right to free speech and will likely be dismissed in court. Of the legislative language so far, none of the bills are fully constitutional, Joe Cohn, the legislative and policy director of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, told me, and if it isnt fully constitutional, theres a word for that: It means its unconstitutional. This does not appear to concern the bills sponsors, though. The larger purpose, it seems, is to rally the Republican baseto push back against the recent reexaminations of the role that slavery and segregation have played in American history and the attempts to redress those historical offenses. The shorthand for the Republicans bogeyman is an idea that has until now mostly lived in academia: critical race theory.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2021/05/gops-critical-race-theory-fixation-explained/618828/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
0 replies, 805 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post