General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsNo Socialist infrastructure needed: Bridge collapse causes train derailment near Sibley, Iowa
https://siouxlandnews.com/news/local/train-derails-near-sibley-iowa-sections-of-town-evacuated-for-safetyUPDATED 9:30 P.M.: A bridge collapse has caused a train to derail near Sibley, Iowa Sunday afternoon.
The Union Pacific derailment happened about 1:20 p.m. sending thick black smoke into the air. Emergency personnel says all waterways near the derailment have been blocked. 47 cars were involved in the crash.
underpants
(182,802 posts)They have a Methodist AND a Lutheran church.
malaise
(268,993 posts)probably explains the neglect
Lovie777
(12,260 posts)constituents.
SergeStorms
(19,201 posts)the middle class (what's left of them) and the poor, yes. But the wealthy constituents.....nothing but the best for them!
Vogon_Glory
(9,117 posts)That particular bridge, like most railroad bridges, is privately owned. Theyre responsible for its maintenance and upkeep.
This is not to say that I favor the Tepublicans policies of neglectI vehemently do not. But not all infrastructure fails are going to be due to Republican policies.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)Vogon_Glory
(9,117 posts)In regards to the bridge, I was a bit surprised when I found out whose bridge that was. The UP has been maintaining and even replacing a lot of their older railroad bridges here in Texas.
HootieMcBoob
(3,823 posts)All bridges and roads would be privately owned.
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)by a Republican governor and/or legislature to the company with a stipulation about bridge maintenance in the sale contract.
Klaralven
(7,510 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)The insurance carrier will have flown their rep out immediately, assuming the entity that owns it does not self insure. At least it didn't happen in a town. As it is, some were evacuated.
brooklynite
(94,547 posts)There's a State Highway five blocks away that's been falling apart for years, and the Government is unable to develop a timely and practical strategy to repair it.
malaise
(268,993 posts)and let the crooked contractors (linked to crooked politicians) repair infrastructure then charge taxpayers to use it.
But you already know this. They can fix that highway easily - tax the rich.
brooklynite
(94,547 posts)There is a libertarian view that Government should privatize everything. The neo-liberal view is that the private sector can provide a useful supplement to traditionally publicly-provided services (charter schools, construction of affordable housing) in sectors where the Government track record is spotty.
And whom do you imagine will be doing repairs on a publicly-owned bridge (hint: they contract out to private firms).
malaise
(268,993 posts)- Reagan/Thatcher loved them and trickling down the piss on the rest of us became history.
The data is on my side of the argument. Ask Biden!
brooklynite
(94,547 posts)malaise
(268,993 posts)That was their new world order - along with racism.
edhopper
(33,579 posts)don't throw around terms that don't apply. Clinton, and to an extent Obama were Neo-liberal.
Thatcher and Reagan were not. They were Neo-conservative, if anything.
malaise
(268,993 posts)share a lot in common.
edhopper
(33,579 posts)Privatization of public works is not a part of the liberal agenda, neo or otherwise.
Just admit you made a mistake in identifying it as such or naming Reagan and Thatcher as Neo-Liberal.
We all post ill informed stuff at times.
malaise
(268,993 posts)and not just in the US
edhopper
(33,579 posts)where Neo-Liberals called for the privatization of all Government functions.
What data are you looking at.
And Friedman and Hayek were not neo-liberal. They are the architects of modern Conservative economics.
malaise
(268,993 posts)When so called Social Democratic political parties across our planet defer to foreign interests and privatize their electricity, water, highways, airports, seaports, etc., and defund public health, public education and more, tell me which of those is a liberal policy?
What they imposed on Chile and the rest of us is being pushed in the US and Biden will face the fight of his lifetime to mop up the madness of trickle down economics by whatever name you want to call it.
edhopper
(33,579 posts)but what we call it is important.
Because we must identify this a s the conservative/fascist agenda and the liberal agenda is to counter it.
malaise
(268,993 posts)but folks from our own ideological wing have played fast and loose with this trickle down approach to the destruction of the social good.
I haven't seen a Democratic President in decades call for lowering taxes on the rich. Clinton increased taxes on the wealthy, and Obama was stymied by McConnell and the Rethugs from doing so. Biden wants to, but we shall see if he is stopped by McConnell, Manchin and Sinema.
Raising taxes on the Rich has been part of the Democratic platforrm since Reagan. You will have to show me where Democrats have embraced trickle down, because I have not seen it.
malaise
(268,993 posts)re Dems taxing the rich
edhopper
(33,579 posts)on how much the ruling elites are fucking us up though.
haele
(12,653 posts)Unregulated, global marketplace. Competition creates efficiency and innovation. Governments should just get out of the way.
Corporations should be independent of National Borders free to do whatever the Market supports.
Labor is fungible, which makes it plentiful; so work should go to the most "productive" workers (i.e., cheapest).
Neo-Liberalism assumes the Market will self-correct should any business get too big, or deal on bad faith, or cheat, etc...
Haele
hatrack
(59,585 posts)Lonestarblue
(9,988 posts)No, I didnt think so.
Cozmo
(1,402 posts)FelineOverlord
(3,578 posts)malaise
(268,993 posts)Someone should ask MoscowMitch for his thoughts on this.
MineralMan
(146,307 posts)One in Southern Minnesota, and the second across the border in Iowa. Same tracks. That freight line runs from Minnesota clear down to the gulf of Mexico in Louisiana, right alongside the Mississippi River. It is heavily used to transport oil and chemicals. It has long been a ecological disaster waiting to happen. That bridge collapse is going to shut things down for a while.
Frankly, pipelines are safer for petroleum and chemical transport. Much safer, in the long run.
malaise
(268,993 posts)MineralMan
(146,307 posts)route for a long time. There is a huge rail yard in my city, where trains are made up. It is full of oil tanker cars. It, too, is right on the Mississippi River. The entire rail line goes along the river. Very dangerous stuff.
malaise
(268,993 posts)They are making money
MineralMan
(146,307 posts)That line is going to be non-functional until that bridge is repaired.