Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malaise

(268,993 posts)
Mon May 17, 2021, 06:41 AM May 2021

No Socialist infrastructure needed: Bridge collapse causes train derailment near Sibley, Iowa

https://siouxlandnews.com/news/local/train-derails-near-sibley-iowa-sections-of-town-evacuated-for-safety

UPDATED 9:30 P.M.: A bridge collapse has caused a train to derail near Sibley, Iowa Sunday afternoon.

The Union Pacific derailment happened about 1:20 p.m. sending thick black smoke into the air. Emergency personnel says all waterways near the derailment have been blocked. 47 cars were involved in the crash.
40 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
No Socialist infrastructure needed: Bridge collapse causes train derailment near Sibley, Iowa (Original Post) malaise May 2021 OP
I see that Sibley is pretty diverse underpants May 2021 #1
Good spot malaise May 2021 #3
I've known for some time that republicans can care less about their . . Lovie777 May 2021 #2
Well... SergeStorms May 2021 #16
It's a privately-owned bridge Vogon_Glory May 2021 #4
Republican policy is to relax regulations so more private infrastructure fails. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2021 #5
That part has truth to it. Vogon_Glory May 2021 #15
If Republicans had their way HootieMcBoob May 2021 #7
and the privately owned bridge was probably sold off NewJeffCT May 2021 #9
Most railroad infrastructure was built privately back in the late 1800s and has been ever since. Klaralven May 2021 #14
Thanks, Vogon. Helpful info. Hortensis May 2021 #20
And what does this have to do with socialism? brooklynite May 2021 #6
There is this neo-liberal view that government should privatize everything malaise May 2021 #12
No, there isn't... brooklynite May 2021 #17
Check out Friedman and Hayek malaise May 2021 #19
Reagan and Thatcher were new-liberals? Good to know... brooklynite May 2021 #22
I don't give a rat's ass what they were malaise May 2021 #26
Well then edhopper May 2021 #29
The neo-liberals and neo-cons malaise May 2021 #30
That is besides the point edhopper May 2021 #31
It should not be but data shows otherwise malaise May 2021 #32
Well you will have to show me edhopper May 2021 #33
In reality it is the US dominated multilateral institutions that give the orders malaise May 2021 #34
Don't disagree edhopper May 2021 #35
I get that malaise May 2021 #36
Really edhopper May 2021 #37
Taxes are only one part of the package and you are correcct malaise May 2021 #38
I am not disagreeing edhopper May 2021 #39
Neo-Liberalism is economic, not political. haele May 2021 #40
Meh. Nothing here that MORE TAX CUTS won't fix! hatrack May 2021 #8
Have you noticed that every time billionaires get a tax cut they run out and repair a bridge? Lonestarblue May 2021 #10
You are sooooo right! Cozmo May 2021 #18
No Socialist infrastructure needed: Bridge collapse causes train derailment near Sibley, Iowa FelineOverlord May 2021 #11
No biggie - just a little dislocation and poison for the peons malaise May 2021 #13
That's two derailed trains now. MineralMan May 2021 #21
What a mess malaise May 2021 #23
It is a mess. I've been concerned with that particular freight MineralMan May 2021 #24
The billionaires and their tools don't give a damn malaise May 2021 #25
Not if the trains can't move. MineralMan May 2021 #27
They will have to learn the hard way malaise May 2021 #28

SergeStorms

(19,201 posts)
16. Well...
Mon May 17, 2021, 08:44 AM
May 2021

the middle class (what's left of them) and the poor, yes. But the wealthy constituents.....nothing but the best for them!

Vogon_Glory

(9,117 posts)
4. It's a privately-owned bridge
Mon May 17, 2021, 07:48 AM
May 2021

That particular bridge, like most railroad bridges, is privately owned. They’re responsible for its maintenance and upkeep.

This is not to say that I favor the Tepublicans’ policies of neglect—I vehemently do not. But not all infrastructure fails are going to be due to Republican policies.

Vogon_Glory

(9,117 posts)
15. That part has truth to it.
Mon May 17, 2021, 08:42 AM
May 2021

In regards to the bridge, I was a bit surprised when I found out whose bridge that was. The UP has been maintaining and even replacing a lot of their older railroad bridges here in Texas.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
9. and the privately owned bridge was probably sold off
Mon May 17, 2021, 08:11 AM
May 2021

by a Republican governor and/or legislature to the company with a stipulation about bridge maintenance in the sale contract.

 

Klaralven

(7,510 posts)
14. Most railroad infrastructure was built privately back in the late 1800s and has been ever since.
Mon May 17, 2021, 08:28 AM
May 2021

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
20. Thanks, Vogon. Helpful info.
Mon May 17, 2021, 09:24 AM
May 2021

The insurance carrier will have flown their rep out immediately, assuming the entity that owns it does not self insure. At least it didn't happen in a town. As it is, some were evacuated.



brooklynite

(94,547 posts)
6. And what does this have to do with socialism?
Mon May 17, 2021, 07:56 AM
May 2021

There's a State Highway five blocks away that's been falling apart for years, and the Government is unable to develop a timely and practical strategy to repair it.

malaise

(268,993 posts)
12. There is this neo-liberal view that government should privatize everything
Mon May 17, 2021, 08:21 AM
May 2021

and let the crooked contractors (linked to crooked politicians) repair infrastructure then charge taxpayers to use it.

But you already know this. They can fix that highway easily - tax the rich.

brooklynite

(94,547 posts)
17. No, there isn't...
Mon May 17, 2021, 09:12 AM
May 2021

There is a libertarian view that Government should privatize everything. The neo-liberal view is that the private sector can provide a useful supplement to traditionally publicly-provided services (charter schools, construction of affordable housing) in sectors where the Government track record is spotty.

And whom do you imagine will be doing repairs on a publicly-owned bridge (hint: they contract out to private firms).

malaise

(268,993 posts)
19. Check out Friedman and Hayek
Mon May 17, 2021, 09:15 AM
May 2021

- Reagan/Thatcher loved them and trickling down the piss on the rest of us became history.
The data is on my side of the argument. Ask Biden!

edhopper

(33,579 posts)
29. Well then
Mon May 17, 2021, 10:17 AM
May 2021

don't throw around terms that don't apply. Clinton, and to an extent Obama were Neo-liberal.
Thatcher and Reagan were not. They were Neo-conservative, if anything.

edhopper

(33,579 posts)
31. That is besides the point
Mon May 17, 2021, 10:58 AM
May 2021

Privatization of public works is not a part of the liberal agenda, neo or otherwise.

Just admit you made a mistake in identifying it as such or naming Reagan and Thatcher as Neo-Liberal.

We all post ill informed stuff at times.

edhopper

(33,579 posts)
33. Well you will have to show me
Mon May 17, 2021, 11:08 AM
May 2021

where Neo-Liberals called for the privatization of all Government functions.

What data are you looking at.

And Friedman and Hayek were not neo-liberal. They are the architects of modern Conservative economics.

malaise

(268,993 posts)
34. In reality it is the US dominated multilateral institutions that give the orders
Mon May 17, 2021, 11:18 AM
May 2021

When so called Social Democratic political parties across our planet defer to foreign interests and privatize their electricity, water, highways, airports, seaports, etc., and defund public health, public education and more, tell me which of those is a liberal policy?
What they imposed on Chile and the rest of us is being pushed in the US and Biden will face the fight of his lifetime to mop up the madness of trickle down economics by whatever name you want to call it.



edhopper

(33,579 posts)
35. Don't disagree
Mon May 17, 2021, 11:57 AM
May 2021

but what we call it is important.
Because we must identify this a s the conservative/fascist agenda and the liberal agenda is to counter it.

malaise

(268,993 posts)
36. I get that
Mon May 17, 2021, 12:00 PM
May 2021

but folks from our own ideological wing have played fast and loose with this trickle down approach to the destruction of the social good.

edhopper

(33,579 posts)
37. Really
Mon May 17, 2021, 12:13 PM
May 2021

I haven't seen a Democratic President in decades call for lowering taxes on the rich. Clinton increased taxes on the wealthy, and Obama was stymied by McConnell and the Rethugs from doing so. Biden wants to, but we shall see if he is stopped by McConnell, Manchin and Sinema.
Raising taxes on the Rich has been part of the Democratic platforrm since Reagan. You will have to show me where Democrats have embraced trickle down, because I have not seen it.

haele

(12,653 posts)
40. Neo-Liberalism is economic, not political.
Mon May 17, 2021, 12:29 PM
May 2021

Unregulated, global marketplace. Competition creates efficiency and innovation. Governments should just get out of the way.

Corporations should be independent of National Borders free to do whatever the Market supports.

Labor is fungible, which makes it plentiful; so work should go to the most "productive" workers (i.e., cheapest).

Neo-Liberalism assumes the Market will self-correct should any business get too big, or deal on bad faith, or cheat, etc...


Haele

Lonestarblue

(9,988 posts)
10. Have you noticed that every time billionaires get a tax cut they run out and repair a bridge?
Mon May 17, 2021, 08:16 AM
May 2021

No, I didn’t think so.

FelineOverlord

(3,578 posts)
11. No Socialist infrastructure needed: Bridge collapse causes train derailment near Sibley, Iowa
Mon May 17, 2021, 08:20 AM
May 2021

The train contained highly explosive ammonium nitrate. 😱


malaise

(268,993 posts)
13. No biggie - just a little dislocation and poison for the peons
Mon May 17, 2021, 08:23 AM
May 2021

Someone should ask MoscowMitch for his thoughts on this.

MineralMan

(146,307 posts)
21. That's two derailed trains now.
Mon May 17, 2021, 09:44 AM
May 2021

One in Southern Minnesota, and the second across the border in Iowa. Same tracks. That freight line runs from Minnesota clear down to the gulf of Mexico in Louisiana, right alongside the Mississippi River. It is heavily used to transport oil and chemicals. It has long been a ecological disaster waiting to happen. That bridge collapse is going to shut things down for a while.

Frankly, pipelines are safer for petroleum and chemical transport. Much safer, in the long run.

MineralMan

(146,307 posts)
24. It is a mess. I've been concerned with that particular freight
Mon May 17, 2021, 10:05 AM
May 2021

route for a long time. There is a huge rail yard in my city, where trains are made up. It is full of oil tanker cars. It, too, is right on the Mississippi River. The entire rail line goes along the river. Very dangerous stuff.

MineralMan

(146,307 posts)
27. Not if the trains can't move.
Mon May 17, 2021, 10:10 AM
May 2021

That line is going to be non-functional until that bridge is repaired.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»No Socialist infrastructu...