Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsEric Boehlert: Stop calling the Arizona charade an "audit"
https://pressrun.media/p/stop-calling-the-arizona-charadeStop calling the Arizona charade an audit
It's a "fraudit"
Eric Boehlert
Now in its seventh week, the pointless review of two million ballots in Maricopa County, Arizonas most populous outpost, has not only emerged as a dishonest, partisan circus, its also a blueprint for how right-wing conspiracists want to treat future GOP election losses. Along the way, theyre deliberately destroying faith in the democratic process.
As the fraudits spread to other states, and as it becomes clear that hard-core Republican fanatics will stop at nothing in their pursuit of overturning the 2020 election, its imperative the press undertake a course correction and stop calling these partisan sham events audits. Theyre not going away and the press needs a better, more exact way to describe them. By adopting GOP audit language, journalists are doing the right wings bidding and undermining confidence in U.S. elections.
Once again, the GOPs radical and dangerous behavior in the age of Trump ought to prompt news outlets to change the language they use to cover American politics. There is no precedent for a former U.S. president to barnstorm the country insisting his election loss was fraudulent and claiming Indians were paid to vote in 2020. And theres no precedent for the mockery thats being made out of ballot-counting in Arizona, a charade that even local Republican election officials have dismissed as a grift disguised as an audit.
The question is, how does the media cover the Grand Canyon States slow-motion train wreck? By using audit without including qualifiers, such as so-called, alleged, or absurd, the press lends an undeserved air of legitimacy to the clown proceedings. The language use becomes especially problematic when audit is deployed in headlines, which is what most people end up reading, instead of the body of the article. A New York Times front-page, print headline yesterday read, Arizonas Vote Audit Is Scorned. Republicans Press On, Anyway.
snip//
By contrast, NPR took a smart approach with a recent headline, putting the word in quotation marks to signal the dubious nature of the Arizona sham: Experts Call It A 'Clown Show' But Arizona 'Audit' Is A Disinformation Blueprint. And a recent CNN report referred to the Arizona effort as a so-called audit and a partisan ballot review.
Another good description for the ongoing shenanigans might be an unofficial review, since the ballot exercise carries no legal weight and cannot change the vote outcome. Partisan inquisition is also an accurate offering, as well as boondoggle, charade, farce, and sham. Using those terms means journalists would have to stand up to Republicans and not be afraid of liberal media bias cries that would certainly follow.
more...
https://pressrun.media/p/stop-calling-the-arizona-charade
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 564 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Eric Boehlert: Stop calling the Arizona charade an "audit" (Original Post)
babylonsister
Jun 2021
OP
bearsfootball516
(6,377 posts)1. It's a charade.
Initech
(100,104 posts)2. I think the term you're looking for is "clusterfuck".
Or maybe "circular firing squad". Eventually they will step in it...
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,567 posts)3. This is a circus and not an audit