General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn 30 years, We've moved from being moderate Democrats to -
This is about where mr pete & I fall on the political spectrum these days -
Peacetrain
(22,877 posts)The thing that stymies both of us.. is when we refuse to take 80 or 90% of a win.. or value the perfect over the good.. or worse yet be so blind to the need to have it in one package that we cannot come to the concept of take all you can get and ram the rest through on reconciliation..
Towlie
(5,324 posts)Wikipedia: Rachel Maddow
FakeNoose
(32,645 posts)I get where she's coming from.
I never have and never will vote for a Repuke, but I know my Grandpa was a lifelong Republican back when it was something to be proud of. In those days Republicans could hold their heads up and look people in the eye and tell them that, but not any more. Not ever again!
Being a moderate liberal/progressive is something I'm proud of, and I'll never lose that.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)under that moderate and proudly progressive conservative candidate. This was the other RW extreme, same people as now, with most as now somewhere between.
Our democracy would be saved and great things accomplished if a Republican majority chose an Eisenhower type as a leader. Not going to happen.
cstanleytech
(26,293 posts)what they are now is their courting of the Southern Democrats decades ago to strengthen their party in the south.
Then the Eisenhower type Republicans gradually left the party and became Democrats so now you have a Republican party that is largely composed of right wing extremists that behave like you would expect someone in the Taliban to behave like.
Amishman
(5,557 posts)Especially on social issues. But we've done this because public opinion has moved.
Drug decriminalization, LBGT marriage and equality, racial theory and the the role of police, immigration; these are all areas where our core stances would have been extreme 30 years ago. Overall societal 'middle' in these areas has progressed significantly
Towlie
(5,324 posts)
←
You've become more liberal over the years and so have I, but kpete is implying that even for those on the left who haven't changed positions, the difference has widened.
A lot of people think recognizing any progress is wrong. What Ive seen in my lifetime is amazing and cause for hope.
soldierant
(6,884 posts)but really, none of it was because I changed an understanding of right and wrong. What moved me was education and a better grasp of facts. A lot of change of position, in fact, may come from that.
Paraphrasing C. S. Lewis, it's not a moral advance that we no longer hang witches. It's because we have learned that witches, in the sense for which they were being hanged, do not exist. If we still believed that there were some people who made explicit pacts with the devil for power which they used to hurt others, we might well still agree that the death penalty was appropriate.
sop
(10,192 posts)facsists, racists, white nationalists, nativist isolationists, science deniers, anti-free traders, vote suppressing, police state nazis who will believe any preposterous lie they read on social media.
USAFRetired_Liberal
(4,167 posts)But its us that get labeled of moving left as if they havent moved far right
Ferrets are Cool
(21,107 posts)in 30 years, the right has only become more evil, racist, misogynistic and mean.
MyOwnPeace
(16,927 posts)for an 'early-morning' thought!
Ferrets are Cool
(21,107 posts)you made me smile.
The Mouth
(3,150 posts)Would be too far left for the fascist fuckwits of today's GQP
RVN VET71
(2,692 posts)The right, certainly since Carter lost to Reagan, has been racist, misogynistic, and evil. But prior to Gingrich and Rove they played it down. Gingrich and Rove enabled them to take pride in their narrowness and meanness, to brag about it openly or at least to dog-whistle so loud it can be heard clearly among its current, depraved mass of voters.
Even with Reagan, the right hid its racism behind a screen of welfare fraud: "See, were not racist, we just dont like these people defrauding the government, these 'Welfare Queens' and also we dont like these black men who just want to rape white women, like Willie Horton. But many of them, the blacks, are good people.
Now-a-days its just, flat out and open:We dont want them black people voting. We dont want their travails in this country to be made known to our white children. We dont want them being valedictorian and salutatorian of their graduating class if there are capable white children to take their place -- and, of course, there will ALWAYS be capable white children to take the place of those black so-called honor students.
The right has always been what it is today, but today its stink is more pungent and sickening. (Are you listening Roy Blunt?)
Ferrets are Cool
(21,107 posts)PatrickforB
(14,576 posts)to healthcare.
yellowdogintexas
(22,264 posts)back in 1970 and became a flaming liberal on the subject.
Then I worked as a claims analyst for Medicare and realized we should all have access to it. This would have been around 1976
On that subject I just get more and more adamant.
calimary
(81,304 posts)Sherman A1
(38,958 posts)Each and every day
Lonestarblue
(10,011 posts)Probably the one area where I have changed is on LGBTQ rightsnot that I was against them, but 30-40 years ago I dont think I had a position at all. I started becoming much more aware after moving to a large Northeast city from the Midwest where most people were still in the closet and there was little public awareness. The AIDS epidemic and working with some wonderful people in the LGBTQ community helped me form the opinions (ultra liberal!) I still have today. Ronald Reagans presidency also drove me further left.
yellowdogintexas
(22,264 posts)I was a budding ultra liberal. The general attitude at the time was "live and let live" and do not judge.
Definitely the AIDS epidemic changed everything.
moreland01
(739 posts)And there are people even farther to the left of me and I feel like I'm as left as they come.
Our City Council is now 6 to 1 progressive. The progressives are dividing themselves into camps (growth vs no growth, immigrant defense fund vs none, stuff like that).
It just feels weird and self-destructive to now be dividing in to tribes within the tribes.
The Mouth
(3,150 posts)Everybody loses their shit at you.
BoomaofBandM
(1,771 posts)Bucky
(54,020 posts)Well, the further down the road we go toward climate instability, economic bifurcation, political corruption and distress, and betrayal of the American dream, the bigger the challenges become to move our country in the right direction.
I'm still there same old classic Keynesian social liberal that my parents were when they raised me. Some things have gotten better, but a lot's gotten worse. Fixing problems left to fester will require bigger efforts. I don't think my values have changed; the world has.
Chainfire
(17,549 posts)ChubbyStar
(3,191 posts)I start howling with laughter shaking my head thinking, who the fuck came up with that codswallop?
betsuni
(25,537 posts)racist fruitcake one.
Chainfire
(17,549 posts)RVN VET71
(2,692 posts)All he had to do was task NASA to change the course of the moon, like Mr. Gohmert has requested. The weather would revert to the good old days and, with it the, droughts would just disappear.
Biden needs to drink a little more Diet Coke and listen to fewer intelligence briefings. He needs to spend a lot less time reading and more time getting to know his twitter feed a little better -- and finding a $130,000 whore wouldnt hurt, either, is what Im thinking. Then hell be a real president, is what Im saying.
Retired Engineer Bob
(759 posts)God bless our hate
Sympthsical
(9,074 posts)You remember the unions. They were the people who . . . ah, nevermind. I'm sure it'll all be fine.
Ron Green
(9,822 posts)is not useful and is indeed quite harmful; something driven by the medias need for a never ending conflict.
BlueWavePsych
(2,635 posts)mgardener
(1,817 posts)Shrike47
(6,913 posts)We used to be the middle. Now hate radio labels any Democrat as a wild-eyed zealot, anarchist hater who wants to destroy America.
certainot
(9,090 posts)to single radio out after 65 replies
30 years is about when it got going good, after reagan killed the fairness doctrine in 1987, a decade before anyone heard of fox and two decades before social media and the russians started using it/liimbaugh to set the stage for the previous guy. 30 years ago limbaugh already was on 500 stations and since his callers couldn't get through to kiss his ring they would call all the other hosts on those and 1000 other statioins to make sure all blowhards were on the same page. the dittohead effect.
now the lying sack of crap is dead and rotting and trumpism rots with it but it lingers without a leader and the dittoheads have no head, the limbaugh wannabes try to outdo each other, and media and political analysts continue to study fish without the water
paleotn
(17,931 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)and also without changing one position. Quite a trick, but then we are really remarkable people.
betsuni
(25,537 posts)Democrats because Democrats are corrupt wealthy Republican-lite corporatist elites who will stop at nothing to prevent progressive ideas! Either that or we're incredibly stupid with Stockholm syndrome.
It's always something!
LakeArenal
(28,820 posts)In 2018 I went to GOTV, worked on a blue wave and hated trump. I think Im the same.
We moved to a country where there are few demonstrations. One about raising property taxes. I did not protest as we own no property here. But the protestors won and they did not get the taxes raised.
I yell at the tv as much as ever.
NewHendoLib
(60,015 posts)yellowdogintexas
(22,264 posts)The older I get, the higher the flames
One of these days I am going to implode
BobTheSubgenius
(11,564 posts)The Reps have dragged the political spectrum so far to the right that some of their heroes wouldn't be such today. Without knowing anything more about them than was known just after the primary season, I feel strongly that both Nixon and Reagan would be primaried as "too liberal." Probably the Bushes, too.
LiberalFighter
(50,943 posts)Is much more liberal than it was back then.
Mosby
(16,318 posts)Democrats used to support "nation building", not anymore. Now non-interventionism is the prevailing foreign policy approach.
Democrats (eg Howard Dean, President Carter) used to support tariffs as a way to encourage developing countries to do better by their people and the environment, not anymore. Now Democrats are free trade globalists.
Democrats used to support free speech. Now some want to criminalize speech, and jail people under hate speech laws.
Democrats used to support liberal pluralism, now it's slowly being supplanted by identity politics.
Caliman73
(11,738 posts)Democrats used to support "nation building", not anymore. Now non-interventionism is the prevailing foreign policy approach.
With the problems in Vietnam, Central and South America, Iraq, and Afghanistan, with the military budget being so ridiculously large, and understanding that "Nation Building" is just a code word for imposition of our own ideas instead of actually helping nations to develop on their own. Some liberals do not want to be engaged in perpetual war.
Democrats (eg Howard Dean, President Carter) used to support tariffs as a way to encourage developing countries to do better by their people and the environment, not anymore. Now Democrats are free trade globalists.
Tariffs are okay in the short term, when trying to negotiate trade agreements and such, however the better solution is to have an industrial policy and sound trade agreements. Globalism is inevitable but that doesn't mean that you race to the bottom. Tariffs are not effective long term strategies for changing behavior, they have been meant primarily to protect domestic industries. Regulated free trade where people are not being exploited is the better strategy.
Democrats used to support free speech. Now some want to criminalize speech, and jail people under hate speech laws.
Simply not true. No one has ever supported absolute free speech. Objectionable views have been tolerated (I.E. Nazis marching in Skokie) however both conservatives and liberals have had their limits. Hate speech which terrorizes already vulnerable populations is not acceptable in a civilized nation. Also, the United States does not have "hate speech laws" so that is a moot point. There is a MAJOR difference between supporting social and financial consequences, or de-platforming people and making laws to criminalize speech.
Democrats used to support liberal pluralism, now it's slowly being supplanted by identity politics.
Democrats continue to support pluralism. Differing opinions and power centers in political systems IS pluralism. Talking about "identity politics" is buying into right wing framing. There have ALWAYS been identity politics, however the identity that was most represented in politics (and still is) is White Men. When you are the dominant majority and your particular view point has always been "the norm", then any other view point that demands respect, would likely seem like oppression. You see that with Christians whining about religious oppression too. Non-White people and women have been treated like 2nd class citizens in the United States for almost all of its history. LGBTQ people have been marginalized legally and socially. These groups coming out into the open and demanding full and equal respect is not Identity Politics. If the laws, systems, and society treated these groups equally, there would be no need to identify them and make those demands.
Mosby
(16,318 posts)I'm working, will reply later, maybe. Big day in the nba.
Caliman73
(11,738 posts)Politics has been pulled way to the right.
speaknow
(321 posts)problem. Many even longer than 30 years just
sat back and watched what was happening and
just sat and sat and sat. Pelosi said it " The
Enemy is within" The in goes pretty deep.
BadgerMom
(2,771 posts)Kablooie
(18,634 posts)Being conservatives who support conservative values to flaming radicals who want to tear down our democracy and install an authoritarian government.
KY_EnviroGuy
(14,492 posts)Did I forget anything else that's new in our behavior?
KY.........
keldridge
(9 posts)These days (I'm 72) I'm a flaming radical.
Evolve Dammit
(16,736 posts)kpete
(71,996 posts)flaming radical mr pete turns 72 next month
he was a Republican in 1970 when I met him
mvd
(65,174 posts)I pretty much accepted what President Clinton was about. I was more liberal but didnt think about it much. I even didnt mind the death penalty in some cases. But now I align a lot with Bernie and AOC.
Cinnamonspice
(163 posts)I would love to watch a match between Pelosi, AOC, and Manchin.
Not to mention a lot of moderate Republicans and independents voted Democrat this previous election. With the Republicans acting insane/All QAnon like, people are running from them.
So even if the far left wants to take over, they can't. They have to scoot over.
Evolve Dammit
(16,736 posts)Ford_Prefect
(7,901 posts)Evolve Dammit
(16,736 posts)tecelote
(5,122 posts)electric_blue68
(14,906 posts)I should by now be marching around with the hammer and sickle flag! 😂 🙄🙄
The Right has just gotten more rightward.
Fortinbras Armstrong
(4,473 posts)As he or she knows about quantum chromodynamics.