Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn Capitol Siege Lawsuit, Judge Refuses to Side with Rep. Eric Swalwell Against Rep. Mo Brooks -- For
For NowA federal judge has settled an intermediate skirmish in a civil lawsuit filed by Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Calif.) against Donald Trump, Donald Trump Jr., Rep. Mo Brooks (R-Ala.), and Rudy Giuliani in connection to the Jan. 6th siege on the U.S. Capitol.
Judge Amit P. Mehta of U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia refused to enter a default judgement on Monday against Rep. Brooks after a request by Rep. Swalwell to do so.
Swalwell argued in court papers dated July 1 that Brooks failed to timely respond to his lawsuit which alleged that the various named defendants including Brooks committed a series of civil wrong by stoking and inciting the Jan. 6th attacks. Generally, as a matter of civil procedure law, failing to respond to a lawsuit will result in a default judgement against a named defendant. Thats what Swalwell wanted to occur viz. Brooks, as this paragraph tidily sums up all while rebuking on Brooks for being somewhat difficult to find in general (citations omitted):
After some effort, Defendant Brooks was served with the summons and complaint on June 6, 2021 at [his] dwelling or usual place of abode with someone of suitable age and discretion who resides there. The affidavit of service was filed on June 8. Under the federal rules, Brooks was required to serve his response within 21 days of service of the complaint, in this case no later than June 27, 2021. To date, Brooks has not done so.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/in-capitol-siege-lawsuit-judge-refuses-to-side-with-rep-eric-swalwell-against-rep-mo-brooks-%e2%80%94-for-now/ar-AALNTeG
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1246 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (13)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In Capitol Siege Lawsuit, Judge Refuses to Side with Rep. Eric Swalwell Against Rep. Mo Brooks -- For (Original Post)
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
Jul 2021
OP
MyOwnPeace
(16,937 posts)1. Why should Brooks respond?
He's a RepubliQan - laws don't apply to them.....
intheflow
(28,501 posts)2. Headline makes it sound like the judge is MAGA.
But this just looks like a ruling on a technicality, not "refusing" or dismissing the action. And it certainly doesn't exonerate Brooks in any way. That's a good thing.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)3. Yeah, the suit is just getting started.
This will plague Brooks for quite a while. I'm OK with that.