General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI live in an NY Co Op
Built in the 50s and still in good shape. We have a good management company that makes sure everything is good and repairs are done.
But a big difference with our building and these condos built after the laws changed in the late 60s is ours was built as rental apartments. The owners wanted a well built structure that would last so he could keep getting rent without exorbitant upkeep for him.
But the newer buildings, built as condos need to stay in shape only until all the units sell and the builder can get out with his profits.
He doesn't care what happens 20 or 30 years later.
And apparently, at least in Florida, no one else made sure they were built to last.
hlthe2b
(102,276 posts)those communities that aren't run by anti-regulatory Republicans or other politicos on the take.
Build and bust cycles over past decades with developers cutting corners at every turn trying to run ahead of the creditors with regulators willing to turn a blind eye in the name of future growth have come back to bite us--not only in coastal housing with impending climate change disasters, but elsewhere as well.
dawg day
(7,947 posts)pointing out that HOAs are mostly made up of civilians-- people who have no experience in construction, maintenance, or real estate... and that they have a real incentive not to assess their neighbors thousands of dollars.
It's just not a system designed for safety.
Me.
(35,454 posts)and is as solid as they come.
Apartments not condo.
45 apartments
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)edhopper
(33,579 posts)is the same age as me, but in better shape.