General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumstblue37
(65,340 posts)Glorfindel
(9,729 posts)The cheeky street kids were probably part of the Baker Street Irregulars.
TxGuitar
(4,190 posts)Ended up buried in France 15ish years later? Very sad.
But I love this and all other colorized old film!
sarge43
(28,941 posts)jpak
(41,757 posts)Very strange
HipChick
(25,485 posts)KentuckyWoman
(6,679 posts)She died in 1953 in Cincinnati. I never saw her go in public without a head covering. It was both cultural and practical. Especially in Berlin, the air was not good and it was a lot of work to wash hair. "Bird baths" daily were the norm.
Scarves would certainly work better than a fancy hat and eventually, practicality becomes fashion.
For instance gloves in public went out of fashion once good antibiotics were available ....
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,001 posts)FoxNewsSucks
(10,429 posts)I really like when people find and post old historic videos like that. It's interesting that nearly all the women in that video have their heads covered, and their coats are similar to a muslim hijab. Rightwingers today would probably be outraged
This one was posted a few years ago. The camera was mounted on the front of one of San Francisco's street cars in 1906. It's 14 minutes long, and I have only watched it all the way through a couple times. Usually I skip around. The traffic, clothes, behavior and everything is so interesting.
indigoth
(137 posts)pedestrians everywhere. Cars everywhere. Horses and wagons everywhere. All going about their business with seemingly no care as to where anyone else is traveling.
Pretty amazing compared to todays traffic control.
KentuckyWoman
(6,679 posts)Oh the stories he tells about traffic in some areas. It has been so fascinating to me.
I joke that the traffic in Atlanta is not a whole lot different.
MustLoveBeagles
(11,599 posts)I didn't realize they'd colorized this. Thanks for posting.
yonder
(9,664 posts)Sneederbunk
(14,290 posts)malthaussen
(17,194 posts)Sancho
(9,070 posts)...and it must have taken a long time to get the kids dressed too.
Hekate
(90,674 posts)Thanks
bucolic_frolic
(43,155 posts)I can hardly recall, now, how poor the information flow in the 1970s, the limited minds of my parents, let alone pre-cars, pre-toasters, pre-radio or tv, when few opportunities existed for anyone getting much of anywhere.
elleng
(130,895 posts)erronis
(15,241 posts)Nowadays we'd just tell the computer to find faces, hands and add some color (whatever the preference.) Oh, and please choose some nice pastels for the ladies' clothes.
sarge43
(28,941 posts)The stains, dirt and crud, everything from coal dust to dried horse manure, didn't show as much.
Dream Girl
(5,111 posts)Hard to imagine anyone going frame by frame
YoshidaYui
(41,831 posts)This is so very cool thanks for posting. Love it
MustLoveBeagles
(11,599 posts)The children are adorable. Thanks for posting.
David__77
(23,382 posts)Apparently average life expectancy was then under 50. Such poverty existed then. It is interesting, and Im not sure whether urban or rural life would be worst then.
KT2000
(20,577 posts)All of the garments look like they are brand new. In reality they would be much worn looking.
Walleye
(31,017 posts)peppertree
(21,630 posts)JohnnyRingo
(18,628 posts)He has that puzzled furrowed eyebrow face.
That's pretty amazing. Thanx for posting.
peppertree
(21,630 posts)Might explain his fixation with being on camera (he loves those close-ups).