General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"Nina Turner basically issued a vengeance warning in her concession speech."
Link to tweet
@AmeshiaCross
At what point did candidates lose the ability to accept their loss, go back and regroup, analyze where they went wrong and commit to helping the community/district regardless of position held? Nina Turner basically issued a vengeance warning in her concession speech.
Ameshia Cross, Political Commentator & Analyst. TV Contributor. Fellow @TrumanProject
. Correspondent @WVON1690
. Activist. Advocate. Democratic Strategist. Tweets are my own
Renew Deal
(81,893 posts)brooklynite
(94,908 posts)greenjar_01
(6,477 posts)Treefrog
(4,170 posts)No idea.
marble falls
(57,425 posts)... fixed before they'd start burning it down. I doubt Turner's commitment to her cause, she seems to be much more interested in her branding than her program.
obamanut2012
(26,180 posts)quaint
(2,589 posts)Phoenix61
(17,023 posts)I dont want in office. Its not like shes Stacey Abrams where a RWNJ won the election.
obamanut2012
(26,180 posts)MineralMan
(146,345 posts)She never was. Perhaps she will learn from this, but I doubt it very much. She is an ideologue with no ability to accommodate the wishes of the majority. In that, she is no different, really, from any other self-styled populist.
Her political career is over at this point. She is irrelevant to US politics.
wyn borkins
(1,109 posts)As I do not Tweet, and I am unsure if I can list proper names, I have only included a few conversational texts below. Please dismiss OR delete this entire comment if this is wrong-headed OR if it's simply not the proper way to detail such information.
Item A: Nina Turner in concession speech: I am going to work hard to ensure that something like this doesnt happen to another progressive candidate again. We didn't lose this race, evil money manipulated and maligned this election.
Item B: Nina Turner doesnt understand the concept of consequences for your actions. Good riddance.
Item C: Nina Turner always handles things like this with such (bad-to-poor) grace.
Item D: Nina Turner is really pathetic, thank goodness she lost, and I'm a progressive Democrat.
MFGsunny
(2,356 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Nothing at all wrong with those quotes.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)by corrupt Democrats and state parties when she worked as an attack dog for Bernie Sanders in 2016, and she kept up the evil democratic corruption lies through 2020 as well, softened them for this run, and is right back to gotta be me.
I dont think shes been stuck in this destructive groove for lack of imagination, this is just what Ms. Bowl Of is.
What I always end up wondering, would it be worse if these people actually believe what they say about Democrats or dont believe it at all? Whatever, the whackadoodle hostility is not a delusion.
At least shes denied the position of a US congressman to continue being herself from. Thank you, OH-11. Our Democratic House progressive caucus is thankful today also.
PatSeg
(47,711 posts)to Democrats than republicans. I pictured her going to congress and attacking Democrats as a fulltime job. Republicans were probably hoping she'd win. They would use her as the poster child for Democrats in future elections. I can envision the campaign ads and bumper stickers now.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)of The Only True Whatevers and must be overcome -- first -- so they can save the nation.
I don't doubt Turner's fury and resentment are real, and I'd hate me too if I knew me as she does. I'm just so glad she won't be able to use a congressional seat (as a Democrat!) to gain press coverage by causing trouble.
But protecting her seat might well have constrained some of her behaviors. And now she'll be free to act out big time. Lol, remembering that Ms. Bowl Of no doubt thought she was being restrained as she did her best to appeal to OH-11's Democratic voters.
P.S.: What Republicans, PatSeg? Maybe they think we created them to blame our evil deeds on and they'll disappear with us.
PatSeg
(47,711 posts)would have constrained her behavior, anymore than it has constrained people like Marjorie Taylor Green or Lauren Boebert. I doubt anything could subdue Nina Turner. It would just give here a bigger stage with more cameras on her. Maybe she just can't help herself, but she certainly doesn't deserve a seat in congress.
Republicans like to use our most outspoken and extreme voices as an example of what all Democrats are supposedly like, especially if they are women. Somehow outspoken liberal women are SO scary to republicans. And meanwhile, Turner is not a Democrat, except when it suits her politically.
I really wish she'd find a different way to express her beliefs and policies.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)That behavior's a perfect way to neuter oneself as a legislator, of course, but like you I believe her biggest goal would continue to be self aggrandizement by drawing national flies to trouble and raising money. To be fair, she likely prefers to see her behaviors as furthering a great movement, not about her at all.
Aside from missing tumult from inside the Democratic caucus, I doubt Republicans will be bothered by the truth that she's not in congress. Everyone already knows LW extremists control the party from some hidden socialist headquarters anyway.
(Might as well laugh.)
PatSeg
(47,711 posts)the Ohio state senate. Whenever she came on television, I'd have to turn the volume down. She was always yelling and always angry, not great selling points. For a long time, I tried to be objective, but eventually I couldn't listen to her anymore. Then when she got involved with the Sanders campaign, what restraint she had flew out the window. Over time, she seemed to have gotten worse and the disparaging and vulgar comments about Biden were the final straw. Any credibility she had with me is long gone now.
So left-wing extremists are really in control of the party? Part of the Deep State I suppose! We are all doomed!
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)early on than you saw -- because I wasn't there to see. Whatever. She hasn't been a clueless, malleable kid for decades; this is what she is.
I of course also saw her in the 2015-2016 national elections, but by then too many, come under the influence, were tricked into believing wrong was more virtuous than right, lies better than truth, and election theft the real patriotism. Every week bad actors just expanded their narratives of deceit to cover the latest developments. And here we are.
I just hope her credibility is mostly gone. Because what she and those like her, who threw their own progressive goals under the Republican bus, disastrously helped empower is still happening.
Speaking of, saw Lt. Col. Vindman on Nicolle Wallace. So reassuring to see him speak of right and truth as if they were real and valuable. He fears that we're still in grave danger of becoming the kind of RW authoritarian state his family fled, but at least now more people are awakened to what's happening.
PatSeg
(47,711 posts)I can remember when that was the accepted norm. Everything has gotten so crazy, it can be hard to remain grounded and sane.
As for Turner, I listened in the beginning because I appreciated some of her progressive ideas, but it was her attitude and disposition that ended up turning me off. The way she has acted the past few years, I'm not sure she is mentally or emotionally stable. She really needs to find something outside of politics.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)We'll stabilize again.
My favorite roadway sign, unattributed, just says "We'll be okay."
PatSeg
(47,711 posts)It feels like all the norms of yesterday are now quaint and archaic. It is really unnerving, especially the perverted attitudes about truth and honesty.
betsuni
(25,750 posts)Seems like a better fit.
PatSeg
(47,711 posts)Yes, a much better fit.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)She'd still be a leader and no doubt still a political one.
more of money came from out of state than in, Shontel beat her on that, not to mention the obvious. A huge group of Ohio clergymen declared her a liar. She also overestimates her own importance especially today.
I say she is poison and is now eating a meal of her own baking.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)PatSeg
(47,711 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Gobble it up and chow down like she's at one of those pie-eating contests.
PatSeg
(47,711 posts)I say give her second helpings as well.
Sprinkles
Me.
(35,454 posts)she obviously made her choice clear and now it's backing up on her
And when you so aptly stated:
"I say she is poison and is now eating a meal of her own baking"
One could easily conclude that she has a serious case of Coprophagia
MrsCoffee
(5,803 posts)PunkinPi
(4,882 posts)redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)mcar
(42,439 posts)Sore loser. And the nerve to criticize "dark money."
Happy Hoosier
(7,454 posts)Last edited Wed Aug 4, 2021, 12:37 PM - Edit history (1)
Ugh.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)I can tell you this... anyone who endorsed her or supported her is someone who APPROVES of her comparing Biden to a "bowl of shit" ... and who approves of her refusing to support Biden over Trump ... and who approves of her supporting Jill Stein over Hillary. (And even if they don't specifically approve or agree with her "bowl of shit" comment, their support of her show a clear lack of good judgement and lack of standards.)
All I'm trying to say is that they've ALL tarnished their own reputations and sullied themselves by association with an anti-Democratic crackpot like Nina Turner. If any of them plan on continuing their political careers, this is something that will be used against them by potential challengers. They'll have some 'splaining to do.
grantcart
(53,061 posts)obamanut2012
(26,180 posts)lololololololololollollllbsdbjhgberjkbdjvd
I was taught good sportsmanship when I was a small child. She and Trump need to learn it.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)on MJ today they were saying how her negative approach to politics was just like TFG's. And really, why did she think a strategy of kicking dems in the teeth would work?
Cha
(297,934 posts)got that.. TY, Me!
Cha
(297,934 posts)boston bean
(36,224 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Her goal was to fuck with the Democratic party... not to work for Biden's agenda, not to strengthen the Democratic party.
boston bean
(36,224 posts)Catherine Vincent
(34,491 posts)I had no cause for this race since I'm in Texas but now that the election is over, I didn't care for this Nina Turner. I saw her a few times on tv and something about her rubbed me the wrong way. Can't explain it.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)In her own words: Nina Turner seems to hate the Democratic party. --- Here's an interesting collection of video/audio clips of interviews that Nina-T has given over the years. She makes it very clear that she has nothing but contempt and distrust of the Democratic Party. Yet here she is, running "as a" Democrat (but only because her preferred "People's Party" didn't have what it takes to get on the ballot in Ohio.)
I spent a few minutes typing a transcript of the on-screen text AND her exact words. Watch and listen to the video... read-along if you want. Here is the TRUTH about what Nina-T thinks of Democrats... the words are coming from her own mouth!
Link to tweet
Nina Turner highlights the moment her disdain for the Democratic Party originated.
-- "... and at a dinner for the Ohio Democratic Party, President Clinton said everyone else's name but mine. So, this is the exclusive because I've never told this story publicly."
Nina Turner explains that President Obama was only a symbolic figure.
-- "... we made no demands of the President, and the 'symbol' of President Obama is a beautiful thing, but what did that get us collectively?"
Nina Turner explains she believes the 2016 Democratic Primary was rigged.
-- "... the fix was in from the beginning!"
Nina Turner explains she is not about party unity: She thinks her preferred 2016 candidate was "cheated"
-- "... well I wasn't there, you know, I was home. Because, my, the person I wanted, you know, got cheated in the primary."
Nina Turner explains if it is a choice between Trump or Hillary, might as well vote for the extreme.
-- "... you know if it's the difference between the lesser of the two evils, we might just go with straight-up evil!"
Nina Turner explains she "would love to see" the extreme left "go crazy" & "hold the Democratic Party hostage"
-- "... what I would love to see the progressive movement do from the progressive members of the House of Representatives and progressive members who may be in the Senate is... to go crazy! Maybe take a page out of the Tea Party book and hold the Democratic Party hostage!"
Nina Turner explains that Kamala Harris joining the ticket is about "checking off a box"
-- "... it cannot be about just checking-off a box! But it is clear that the Democratic Party -- that is what they are most concerned about -- see, they're more concerned about optics."
Nina Turner explains that Kamala Harris joining the ticket is the ticket Wall Street wants.
-- "... Wall Street has the ticket that they want!"
Nina Turner explains that having to vote between Donald Trump and Joe Biden is like choosing between two bowls of shit to eat.
-- "... you got two bowls of shit in front of you, and you got to pick one. That's the situation we in right now. Bowl #1 or Bowl #2?"
How can Nina work with a party she hates?
-- "... these so-called Democrats!"
-- "... I have no faith in the Democratic Party."
ecstatic
(32,777 posts)at a dinner? Smh.
Cha
(297,934 posts)MustLoveBeagles
(11,673 posts)I've never really cared for her.
BadgerKid
(4,559 posts)With Ameshias tweet, Its occurring to me there is a common trait among our dear Trump-humpers, anti-Vaxxers, zealots, financial industry, etc. It is a certain willful denial of present circumstances and truths to the point of actively bullying and dismantling of support systems and safeguards. They would rather tear people down than build them up.