General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPeek Inside Gloria Vanderbilt's Whimsical NYC Apartment for Sale
11 photos here.
30 Beekman Place, #2A
$1,125,000 | 3 beds, 2.5 baths
https://www.apartmenttherapy.com/gloria-vanderbilt-nyc-apartment-36958796?utm_source=RSS&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Category%2FChannel%3A+main
The kitchen is shockingly unadorned compared to the rest of the pictures.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)A million bucks won't buy you anything real fancy in Manhattan these days. Probably Anderson Cooper helped out.
Me.
(35,454 posts)but made a bundle selling her jeans
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)By a lawyer and a business manager some time in the 1990s.
Apparently there isn't a Vanderbilt alive today that is considered to be really wealthy.
She left 1 million dollars to Anderson Cooper and the apartment to her other son.
Response to Tomconroy (Reply #9)
StarfishSaver This message was self-deleted by its author.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)It looks like the home of a very individual, interesting personality who surrounded herself with things that she loved and that represented a life well lived.
mcar
(42,402 posts)It does represent the individual's personality.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)It looks cold and contrived to me. I much prefer spaces with lots of personality, even if they may look cluttered ... I'm always much more comfortable in spaces that tell me something about the people who created and inhabit them.
That's just me - but I know I'm in the minority.
pandr32
(11,630 posts)I can't handle cold, sterile interiors. Being a big art fan I much prefer my environment to be filled with art and special, interesting things. There is no place like home.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)I've aalways been put off by homes that look like they are waiting for the photographers to show up at any moment and shoot the rooms for a cover spread in Architectural Digest: no personal effects, no photos, nothing that reflects the personality of the owners.
If given the choice, I so much prefer rooms that may be a little "junky," but are full of color and life and history and tales to be told.
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)oriented to when young. Whatever comes next, it always tends to be a favorite.
I do appreciate the clean looks of the current "fusion," unisexual, hotel-inspired interiors of people who mostly must be gone working all day and who either clean after work or have anonymous employees of middle class cleaning services in to do it. (None of those were trusted near or to do a proper job with Ms. Vanderbilt's possessions!) It can be very good looking, with modern production methods nice stuff very affordable.
But when I was young, the rich "layered" colorful look reflecting the lives of people who lived rich, big, colorful lives was very popular, or a more bohemian look for those more like me, and I still love it.
I also still like the clean, simplified modern of that era, which was not at all austere -- in the glossy mags museum-quality art and sculpture , and I still love the wonderful serene quiet of rooms carpeted wall to wall. Art aside, in my experience modern was very unforgiving of gouges or wear of any kind and was very hard to carry off without a big budget for quality furniture. Now it's much more within ordinary means.
malaise
(269,212 posts)bright and full of flowers
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)catbyte
(34,478 posts)But, as I said that's just me, ymmv.
Sympthsical
(9,130 posts)*twitches* I cannot stand clutter. It's open space or nothing. I put my partner on probation when he suggested we put shelves on various walls to display tchotchkes that he then wanted us to shop around for together. So this place is my worst nightmare.
After 18 months, I finally -f-i-n-a-l-l-y - put my art on the walls in my office.
I won't go into the fact I'd have to pirate-eye it just to walk through the place. How do you look at this everyday? And the windows, oh god. Gaze lovingly out into the street and never get diarrhea again.
kskiska
(27,048 posts)Anderson has claimed he never had vegetables and still doesn't eat them. He has weird tastes and said he doesn't understand waffles - they're just pancakes with holes, said there wasn't much in their refrigerator growing up except vodka and Carr's Water Biscuits.
Jackie Kennedy's Central Park apartment's kitchen was very old-fashioned and outdated. After all, she never had to cook there. The hired help prepared all their meals.
tblue37
(65,490 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(175,754 posts)I would not have so many patterns in a single room, though. That rug is way too busy, but it probably had meaning to her. No portraits of myself, please!
brooklynite
(94,786 posts)Whimsical or not, there's got to be some major renovation work needed.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,908 posts)I've also noticed over the years that the homes of the wealthy tend to be hideously overdecorated, with lots and lots of patterned fabrics that clash terribly.
No wonder she moved regularly in earlier years.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)I agree - over-decoration is not a good look when we're talking about contrived decoration full of things that were curated but not personal to the owner. But, on the other hand, homes with lots of stuff that mean something to the people living there can be quite lovely, even if that stuff would be clutter to anyone else.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,908 posts)the pictures of Ms. Vanderbilt's home look to me like a cluttered, over-decorated place. Other than the kitchen, which I suspect she essentially never went into.
StarfishSaver
(18,486 posts)Which is what matters.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)No idea if any of those furnishings are included in the fire sale price. (Or if it's a walkup, with no AC.)
I do love the kitchen, though-- loads of space, and hardly broken in.
IcyPeas
(21,915 posts)pictures 7 and 9.
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)have decent wiring, and not all of them were upgraded over the years.
"AC? We don't have AC, we just go to our place the shore when it gets hot."
OnDoutside
(19,981 posts)Luciferous
(6,086 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Dorothy Rogers', wife of composer Richard Rogers, socialite, entertainer, and big lover of cooking, designed her last big kitchen for herself as a highly efficient workroom that could meet all demands well, very small to very large. She designed a means of quickly serving large meals, without servants, from the privacy of the kitchen to the beautiful, large very sophisticated dining-living room next door but very separate. Not for her crowds of guests wrongly imagining her workroom provided a better atmosphere than fine art, books, Richard's piano and Richard, their gorgeous view, etc.
Her house before that one was something of a "country" version of Ms. Vanderbilt's NYC look. Gorgeous, but high maintenance that she finally tired of after years of loving it.