General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWowzie, does anyone have an explanation for the wall to wall attacks on Biden re Afghanistan?
Even sticking to text, it is hard to avoid the message, we must give up on Biden.
Nothing Trump did including the sell out of Afghanistan to the Taliban has ever received the kind of thrashing Biden is being given over Afghanistan.
The MSM seems intent on convincing all Americans to give up on Biden.
Not even the Jan. 6 attack on the Capital, generated this much anti-Trump coverage.
jmbar2
(4,912 posts)ShazamIam
(2,577 posts)the even bigger budget/reconciliation. Are they preparing a path for Sinema and Manchin to withhold support?
Add in the, the not so subtle support the, "big liars," have been given by this same MSM.
jmbar2
(4,912 posts)Anything to derail Joe's agenda.
marble falls
(57,403 posts)TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)ShazamIam
(2,577 posts)NewHendoLib
(60,027 posts)hence we are a no media zone in my house - no TV news of any sort for 17 years now.
It's all utter bullshit
doc03
(35,407 posts)have to give Trump credit, he would have created some kind of diversion by now.
TheProle
(2,210 posts)Is the assumption that the media shouldnt cover the final chapter of a 20 year war. There is plenty of criticism to go around, but President Biden doesnt get a pass for his role in this shitshow.
Lovie777
(12,380 posts)towards other agencies to beat up. In the end . . . .
Another shinny object.
Chuuku Davis
(565 posts)Pull the Americans and SIVs out before pulling the troops.
PortTack
(32,813 posts)Lovie777
(12,380 posts)and shithole's administration made agreements one being the release of 5,000 Taliban from prison back on Afghan soil.
madamesilverspurs
(15,813 posts)with who owns the media.
Non-mainstream media reports that up to 95% of Americans strongly support Biden.
Mainstream media is invested in the opposite point of view.
.
ShazamIam
(2,577 posts)They don't even acknowledge the support, only one so far has noted it, Wallace.
RockRaven
(15,051 posts)Any disengagement from that, especially in any manner that has any hint of humiliation, threatens their project.
Mme. Defarge
(8,056 posts)Cest ça.
They made a fortune at the dawn of cable news with the First Gulf War. Then 911, Afghanistan, Iraq. Biden's agenda to fix things back to normal is anathema. It's so boring. Won't keep people glued to the media.
JoanofArgh
(14,971 posts)Bernard Shaw was reporting from under a desk in a Baghdad hotel as cruise missiles went past.
ShazamIam
(2,577 posts)PortTack
(32,813 posts)BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)So the media decided to whip up a feeding frenzy based on mostly imagined facts on the ground in Afghanistan. Along with that - never underestimate the number of reporters who think taking Biden down a few pegs might do their careers good.
Sympthsical
(9,149 posts)Sorry, but it didn't. Complaining about the media nonstop accomplishes little. Our allies are appalled with how it's all gone. (The German government has a lot to say).
There are still tens of thousands of Westerners in-country with no easy or even perceivable path out. There are reports that the British military wants to throttle the Americans over what is happening at the airport.
It's a lot of political damage.
I'm with Biden. We needed to get out.
But the execution is just . . . not great. We're going to find out why. What did our intelligence, both civilian and military, know? Who reported what to whom? How much did the administration know? How much should it have known? We already have three committees headed by Democrats looking into it. They're not happy either. When Congressional leaders aren't happy, you know it's bad.
But man, there's a whole lot of this going on right now, it seems:
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)Hoyt
(54,770 posts)decision to withdraw.
Don't see how the execution of the withdrawal plan, assuming there was a plan, can be blamed on others.
Biden could have easily announced that he was delaying the withdrawal a month or two because additional troops and air support -- as a rear guard -- were needed because trump drew the troops down too far. He could have also said that he did not think trump's "agreement" with the Taliban could not be relied upon.
Instead, Biden said this would not be like Saigon. That video and people clinging to the plane will be run 24/7 right up to the 2022 elections (which is just over a year away) and in 2024.
I am glad Biden is sending in additional troops and appears to be taking decisive action now.
The juxtaposition of Biden's statements and the photos out of Kabul are politically devastating.
And there was at least some warning about all this. More and more articles like this are coming out:
https://www.cnn.com/2021/08/17/politics/biden-afghanistan-blame-shifting/index.html
Factions within the Biden administration are embroiled in a blame game over why the US government didn�t act sooner to withdraw American citizens and Afghans who helped the US over two decades of war, leading to a rushed and dangerous evacuation.
Military officials have said that for weeks they urged the State Department to move faster in evacuating its diplomatic personnel. State Department officials have said they were operating based on intelligence assessments that suggested they had more time, but intelligence officials insist that they had long reported the possibility of a rapid Taliban takeover.
An intelligence assessment produced within the last month assessed that the Taliban were pursuing a total military victory in Afghanistan, a source familiar with the intelligence said, despite ostensibly negotiating for peace in Doha and even as the administration continued to express confidence in those talks.
I get that all kinds of people and departments are in CYA mode. But if even half of what's leaking - no, gushing - out is true, the politics of the thing will get worse before they get better.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,348 posts)2naSalit
(86,879 posts)ansible
(1,718 posts)PRETZEL
(3,245 posts)The initial coverage of a chaotic Kabul shocked alot of people and should not have been ignored. But now that we're in day 2 or 3, things are calming down and it has an appearance of a more orderly transition. But the sensationalism of that first day, and the knee jerk reaction that Kabul was a clusterfuck of incompetence, was just that, a knee jerk reaction.
But to some degree, it has to be noted that there isn't much else going on. Alot of people are getting Covid weary and that the House is not in session to debate the infrastructure and reconciliation bills.
Come September when the House comes back in, and making an assumption that there continues to be an orderly transition of the Afghan government, the narratives will switch.
ProfessorPlum
(11,279 posts)"The only one who got it right was the president. And the more stories I read from anonymous sources at the Pentagon or in what is laughingly called the intelligence community, the more I think that whats driving this heated C-Y-A effort is that the president called bullshit on what everybody was telling him and acted on what was right there before his eyes. He pulled the emergency brake on the damn gravy train.
Believe this. Almost everything youre reading on this topic in elite publications is an effort by somebody somewhere to duck out of their responsibility for 20 years of fantasy and illusion and outright lies. Craig Whitlock of the Washington Post called all of them out when he printed the so-called Afghanistan Papers. Anything that is attributed to the various anonymous sources that is in any way contradicted by Whitlocks work is simply not to be trusted."
ShazamIam
(2,577 posts)crickets
(25,988 posts)robertpaulsen
(8,632 posts)Satire is a mighty lesson.
https://www.theonion.com/withdrawal-from-afghanistan-ends-longest-media-farce-in-1847496557
malaise
(269,237 posts)War is very profitable
madamesilverspurs
(15,813 posts)Military Media Industrial Complex
.
malaise
(269,237 posts)They have their own agenda
brooklynite
(94,836 posts)Over the top descriptions arent any better on our side.
ShazamIam
(2,577 posts)FloridaBlues
(4,010 posts)Let the troops do their missions.
redstatebluegirl
(12,265 posts)Especially the military, generals want to win, end of story.
spanone
(135,912 posts)helpisontheway
(5,008 posts)Now it is nonstop because they finally found a way to knock Biden down. All along foreign policy was supposed to be his strength so they want to weaken him. Just as military service was John Kerrys strength when he was running but the media helped them make it seem like a weakness. They tried to destroy Obama with Reverend Wright but it did not work.
betsuni
(25,729 posts)Kid Berwyn
(15,017 posts)Cant get started early enough defeating the socialist communist left wing blah blah blah with the midterms only 15 months away.
Locutusofborg
(526 posts)the president gets the credit for (whether he deserves it or not). And whatever goes wrong during an administration, the president shoulders the blame (whether he deserves it or not). Not unlike the quarterback of a football team.
ShazamIam
(2,577 posts)equivalency, like oh back in 200 bc a Democratic president dis something similar or some bs. Yes, deliberate hyperbole.
rockfordfile
(8,708 posts)I'm thinking of the song by Green Day, American Idiot.
Shermann
(7,459 posts)So the media is going to pounce. It's good for ratings and helps them to demonstrate some neutrality after ripping Trump on a daily basis for four years.
multigraincracker
(32,738 posts)Me.
(35,454 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,344 posts)the Newsom recall and Cuomo resignation, they smell blood in the water. Don't think for one minute all these things aren't connected. Watch your back, Kamala.
kairos12
(12,891 posts)Orange Blob.
Response to ShazamIam (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
LisaM
(27,847 posts)In my opinion, the media was.a cheerleader for both of those engagements. I didn't understand it then, and I don't understand why they seem to want us to stay in both places.
Imperialism Inc.
(2,495 posts)There are lots of small reasons like clickbait, etc, but really the main one is they are butt-covering like everyone else involved in the 20 wasted years.
How many multi-day frenzies did they have over the 10s of thousands of collateral damage deaths? The corrupt warlords who abused the people? Including the one that had young boy sex slaves? Pocketed our money and put fake names on lists of "soldiers"? They covered none of that. Not even after the Afghanistan Papers came out. You could find it in dribs and drabs but never any major focus on the fact that the war has been a disaster for years.
Combine that with the fact that they are naturally inclined to support the war machine and you get this.
ShazamIam
(2,577 posts)RANDYWILDMAN
(2,678 posts)They can't seem to stick anything else to him.
Crap, he is trying to help people with the pandemic, infrastructure...we just need to change the subject.
ShazamIam
(2,577 posts)the government again over the debt ceiling.
Deminpenn
(15,292 posts)competent at governing, legislating to help Americans, businesses and industries who need it and generally moving the country in a positive direction on many fronts. The administration is full of competent professionals who are in their positions to serve all Americans and not to enrich themselves with whatever grifts they can while in office.
As far as "must see TV", this is all pretty boring. OTOH, the withdrawal from Afghanistan is a little messy at the moment and lends itself to Monday morning quarterbacking and breathless reporting. Much better for ratings.
ShazamIam
(2,577 posts)betsuni
(25,729 posts)Republicans always are. They never would've blamed a Republican president. Daddy gets respect. Everything's always Mommy's fault.
Also a rule that if anything bad happens during a Republican administration, it's the fault of the previous Democratic one. Once a Democratic administration takes charge, the previous Republican administration that screwed everything up suddenly never existed.