Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FreeState

(10,572 posts)
Sat Aug 21, 2021, 12:44 AM Aug 2021

Court rules California gig worker initiative is unconstitutional

Hoping this ruling is upheld - Uber and Lyft are stealing from tax payers and not paying their employees a full wage (benefits).

A California judge on Friday ruled that a 2020 ballot measure that exempted ride-share and food delivery drivers from a state labor law is unconstitutional as it infringed on the legislature's power to set standards at the workplace.

Proposition 22 is unconstitutional as "it limits the power of a future Legislature to define app-based drivers as workers subject to workers' compensation law", which makes the entire ballot measure "unenforceable", Alameda County Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch wrote in the ruling.


Gig economy companies including Uber, Lyft, Doordash and Instacart were pushing to keep drivers' independent contractor status, albeit with additional benefits.


https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/21/proposition-22-court-rules-california-ride-hailing-law-unconstitutional.html

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court rules California gig worker initiative is unconstitutional (Original Post) FreeState Aug 2021 OP
Isn't the entire point of an initiative Zeitghost Aug 2021 #1
This is a better explication FreeState Aug 2021 #2
Thank you, that last paragraph is eye opening Sewa Aug 2021 #3
Your welcome FreeState Aug 2021 #4

Zeitghost

(3,858 posts)
1. Isn't the entire point of an initiative
Sat Aug 21, 2021, 01:07 AM
Aug 2021

To bypass the legislature? It seems to me that this would nullify just about anything passed directly by the voters.

FreeState

(10,572 posts)
2. This is a better explication
Sat Aug 21, 2021, 01:14 AM
Aug 2021

This article is better at quoting the ruling:

The judge’s order found that Section 7451 of the measure is unconstitutional because it “defines unrelated legislation an ‘amendment’” to the measure, making the entire measure unenforceable. The section states that any future laws related to collective bargaining for app drivers must comply with the rest of Prop. 22, which violated the requirement that ballot measures focus on a single subject, Roesch ruled.

“It appears only to protect the economic interest of the network companies in having a divided, ununionized workforce, which is not a stated goal of the legislation,” he wrote.

The measure also requires a seven-eighths vote of approval to pass any amendments in the state Legislature, which is unconstitutional, Roesch ruled.


https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/Prop-22-the-gig-worker-exemption-for-Uber-and-16401915.php

Sewa

(1,255 posts)
3. Thank you, that last paragraph is eye opening
Sat Aug 21, 2021, 04:21 AM
Aug 2021

And some Dems voted for this Prop 22 bullshit. Shameful 💀😎

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Court rules California gi...