Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCourt rules California gig worker initiative is unconstitutional
Hoping this ruling is upheld - Uber and Lyft are stealing from tax payers and not paying their employees a full wage (benefits).
A California judge on Friday ruled that a 2020 ballot measure that exempted ride-share and food delivery drivers from a state labor law is unconstitutional as it infringed on the legislature's power to set standards at the workplace.
Proposition 22 is unconstitutional as "it limits the power of a future Legislature to define app-based drivers as workers subject to workers' compensation law", which makes the entire ballot measure "unenforceable", Alameda County Superior Court Judge Frank Roesch wrote in the ruling.
Gig economy companies including Uber, Lyft, Doordash and Instacart were pushing to keep drivers' independent contractor status, albeit with additional benefits.
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/21/proposition-22-court-rules-california-ride-hailing-law-unconstitutional.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 769 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court rules California gig worker initiative is unconstitutional (Original Post)
FreeState
Aug 2021
OP
Zeitghost
(3,858 posts)1. Isn't the entire point of an initiative
To bypass the legislature? It seems to me that this would nullify just about anything passed directly by the voters.
FreeState
(10,572 posts)2. This is a better explication
This article is better at quoting the ruling:
The judges order found that Section 7451 of the measure is unconstitutional because it defines unrelated legislation an amendment to the measure, making the entire measure unenforceable. The section states that any future laws related to collective bargaining for app drivers must comply with the rest of Prop. 22, which violated the requirement that ballot measures focus on a single subject, Roesch ruled.
It appears only to protect the economic interest of the network companies in having a divided, ununionized workforce, which is not a stated goal of the legislation, he wrote.
The measure also requires a seven-eighths vote of approval to pass any amendments in the state Legislature, which is unconstitutional, Roesch ruled.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/tech/article/Prop-22-the-gig-worker-exemption-for-Uber-and-16401915.php
Sewa
(1,255 posts)3. Thank you, that last paragraph is eye opening
And some Dems voted for this Prop 22 bullshit. Shameful 💀😎
FreeState
(10,572 posts)4. Your welcome
I was amazed how many people fell for propaganda from the companies.