General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Third Force: On stupidity and transcendence
In 1943, after being interrogated by Vichy police officers who suspected him (rightly) of conspiring to rescue Jews from the occupying Nazis, a French clergyman named André Trocmé stepped into the open air with a revised view of the human condition. Before he entered that police station in Limoges, he thought the world was a scene where two forces were struggling for power: God and the Devil, writes one of his chroniclers. From then on, he knew that there was a third force seeking hegemony over this world: stupidity.
Trocmés eureka was by no means uniquehis German contemporary and co-religionist Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote that stupidity (or folly, depending on your translation) was a more dangerous enemy of the good than maliceand it still rings true today. From the troglodytic inanities of entertainments such as the Instagram account Girls Getting Hurt (894,000 followers) to the pyrotechnic disasters of gender-reveal parties, stupidity is everywhere we look, not least of all in those who look for it everywhere but within themselves.
My own Trocmé moment came with a photo in the New York Times of an angry crowd protesting the tyranny of face masks in the midst of an exaggerated pandemic, an ominous prelude to the storming of the Capitol the following year to overturn a stolen election. As luck would have it, the antimask protests were taking place at the same time that my wife was reading about England during the Second World War, so there was this repeated dinnertime comparison of the prodigious sacrifices made by bombed-out Londoners with those that peacetime Michiganders found insufferable enough to justify calling up the militia. Delusional, obstinate, and perverse seemed woefully inadequate descriptors, and stupid regrettably unkind, but there it was. What else could you call it?
Stupid doesnt mean unintelligent or even uninformed. The political philosopher Eric Voegelin was closer to the mark when he defined stupidity as a loss of reality. Its possible to take Voegelins definition a step further and say that stupidity is a denial of reality to the degree that ones own survival, to say nothing of the survival of others, is imperiled. Too dumb to live, we might say, summoning metaphors of dodo birds and dinosaurs, creatures who may not have been especially unintelligent but who owe their reputations as lamebrains in large part to their extinction. Stupidity is oblivious to negative consequences; it falls into a pit. Gross stupidity invites negative consequences; it looks for a pit. Theres an element of willfulness to it: let the oceans rise, let the virus rage, you cant scare me. Socrates held that human beings do not knowingly act against their best interests; perhaps his wisdom made it hard for him to imagine a human being who could say, To hell with my best interests, and screw Socrates too. A willful loss of reality, however death-defying it may appear, is never far from a wish for death.
https://harpers.org/archive/2021/09/the-third-force-stupidity-and-transcendence/
Good essay imo.
brush
(53,922 posts)in the world. Never heard it put quite that way, but it's accurate.
lapfog_1
(29,227 posts)There are sharks, dolphins, and tuna in this world, you want to be one of the dolphins.