General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFelineOverlord
(3,578 posts)SergeStorms
(19,199 posts)As usual, we have to feed the U.S. war machine and make military contractors insanely wealthy, thereby securing huge political donations to republican politicians who don't want to lose their cushy jobs, so then they can secure even more money for a bloated Pentagon budget, who love developing all new ways to kill people and gain monstrously expensive defense contracts, who will then contribute generously to the campaigns of the congressional republicans who secured those gigantic defense contracts for them........ it never ends.
As much as the U.S. likes to preach peace, we're a war loving country whose only industrial export is death and destruction. Oh, and sugary drinks/food, high in calories but low on nutrition....but that's another story. I'll stick with greedy defense contractors and crooked republican politicians, for now.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)... Keynesian economics, which was validated by the massive government spending during WW2 that finally pulled us out of the depression, by either government spending on infrastructure or on the military.
We chose military spending. Incorrectly.
It might've seemed "logical" back then, after the USA was thrust into the position of the new global leader.
jaxexpat
(6,820 posts)They called it Communism so there'd be not misinterpreting their meaning. They meant that anybody who didn't approve of "defense" spending was a dirty communist. When in fact we never had any fear of communism taking over our government. The low-dose socialism everyone had agreed to support was working well as a financial back-stop. That is, well for all but the minorities. Those who were relegated to live on the fringe of a general prosperity, participating only in increments. Boy, when they finally woke up, there went the music. And all the rest is pro-rock-n'-roll VS anti-rock n'-roll history.
c-rational
(2,592 posts)SergeStorms
(19,199 posts)And the U.S. always chooses guns.
aggiesal
(8,914 posts)are in and around D.C.
The wealthy include the Military Industrial Complex including their lobbyists.
former9thward
(31,997 posts)The War budget goes up in every administration no matter the party.
SergeStorms
(19,199 posts)Democrats would like to reverse that, but the GQP would scream bloody murder that Democrats are "weak on defense", and then place every straw man in their arsenal anywhere there's an empty space, just to "prove" it.
Unfortunately the majority of Americans have been conditioned over the past 70 years to believe that.
The Pentagon is a black hole, and it sucks in every dollar not nailed down.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,326 posts)Sideways Clap clap
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)hlthe2b
(102,236 posts)DinahMoeHum
(21,784 posts)GoodRaisin
(8,922 posts)IronLionZion
(45,433 posts)some people just want an excuse to kill some people. Others want to build stuff. Yet others want to get rich from sweetheard deals and no-bid contracts.
Plenty of idiots are whining about the cost of the infrastructure bill.
AndyS
(14,559 posts)Sam Adams loved intelligence work, and that enthusiasm shines throughout this memoir of his years with the Central Intelligence Agency. His career was dominated by an epic struggle over Vietnam -- over military attempts to hide the true size of the enemy forces there, and over the integrity of the intelligence process. Adams's insistence on telling the truth caused an ungodly ruckus in both Washington and Saigon at the time, and years later, after the CIA had threatened to fire him (on thirteen occasions!) and he had quit the agency in disgust, Adams brought his story back up to the surface more loudly than ever in a CBS television documentary which eventually resulted in a notorious trial on libel charges brought by General William Westmoreland.
After leaving the CIA, Adams sat down to write an account of his life at the agency. There is nothing else quite like the story he tells.
Lies and lies about lies. All to keep an un-winnable war going for the sake of profits.
Ya' think we'd learn . . .
Rebl2
(13,498 posts)with my fellow Kansas Citizen.
bucolic_frolic
(43,146 posts)wars and foreign escapades have a payoff in finances, domination, or resources. We were the last major power left standing after WWII. We've had no such success since, in fact we have more competition now.
Kid Berwyn
(14,897 posts)He was training the Iraqi army and smelled the rat. He spoke up and soon, just before rotating home, was dead from suicide.
Know your BFEE: They kill good soldiers like Col. Ted Westhusing for profit...
https://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x126094
IthinkThereforeIAM
(3,076 posts)... I was on to this same topic in the early 2000's and have many of the same bookmarks/favorites.
I cannot emphasize enough that any student of U.S.A. history since the time of the civil war needs to keep the above link as a reference of who did what and what happened; oh, and who made, "oodles and oodles of money off of it". The, "why", should be self explaining.
crickets
(25,969 posts)Thanks for all of the work you did putting it together then, and thank you for linking to it today.
jaxexpat
(6,820 posts)UTUSN
(70,686 posts)Joinfortmill
(14,417 posts)Jilly_in_VA
(9,966 posts)UTUSN
(70,686 posts)***********QUOTE*******
https://news.yahoo.com/served-afghanistan-us-marine-twice-100000389.html
.. Two: What happened last week was inevitable, and anyone saying differently is still lying to you.
I know because I was there. Twice. On special operations task forces. I learned Pashto as a U.S. Marine captain and spoke to everyone I could there: everyday people, elites, allies and yes, even the Taliban.
The truth is that the Afghan National Security Forces was a jobs program for Afghans, propped up by U.S. taxpayer dollars a military jobs program populated by nonmilitary people or paper forces (that didnt really exist) and a bevy of elites grabbing what they could when they could. ....
So when people ask me if we made the right call getting out of Afghanistan in 2021, I answer truthfully: Absolutely not. The right call was getting out in 2002. 2003. Every year we didnt get out was another year the Taliban used to refine their skills and tactics against us the best fighting force in the world. After two decades, $2 trillion and nearly 2,500 American lives lost, 2021 was way too late to make the right call. .
********UNQUOTE*********
Moostache
(9,895 posts)Here in East Kansas, he will likely lose by 20 points to a craven lunatic with no qualifications beyond a magic "R" by his name on the ballot. I hate it here.
Uncle Joe
(58,355 posts)Thanks for the thread FelineOverlord.
Rabrrrrrr
(58,349 posts)infrastructure, research, healthcare, and other, more moral and helpful, things.
Every dollar we spent on warmongering bullshit to make Cheney et. al. richer, we became $2 behind the rest of the world.
onetexan
(13,040 posts)While all other superpowers have spent their dimes on building up their own countries. We need to stop taking care of the world & take care of our own problems for a long while.