General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMan Photographed as Baby on 'Nevermind' Cover Sues Nirvana, Alleging Child Pornography
Spencer Elden, the man whose unusual baby portrait was used for one of the most recognizable album covers of all time, Nirvanas Nevermind, filed a lawsuit Tuesday alleging that the nude image constituted child pornography.
Now my question is if you have this album in Itunes will the Iphone Child Porn photo cloud tracker alert authorities to your possession of child porn?
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)Bettie
(16,100 posts)Personally, I think it is a ridiculous lawsuit, but he's looking for a payday and will probably get it.
FSogol
(45,484 posts)Whiskeytide
(4,461 posts)
that the parents consented. In a 2008 interview the father said the photographer (a friend) called him and said you can make $200 if you let me photograph your kid in the pool. They had a pool party and the photo was taken, and the parents never really knew what it was for until later.
Might be BS, and certainly you could say dad was stupid for not realizing the photo would have had some commercial purpose, but the failure to get the parents to sign a consent form backs up the murky circumstances.
Funny. I remember thinking at the time why would parents let their kid be in that photo. Its bound to be weird when they grow up.
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)cinematicdiversions
(1,969 posts)Bettie
(16,100 posts)and am happy to help when I can!
Rorey
(8,445 posts)I don't know enough about the intent of whoever decided to use that as a cover photo, but I guess I sort of shudder at the thought of what kind of door this kind of suit will open as far as baby photos go.
What I mean is, lots of parents take photos of their babies in the bath, or otherwise unclothed, and I've never before thought of the photos as being child pornography.
Glorfindel
(9,729 posts)Museums would have to provide tiny aprons for their depictions of the Holy Infant. The mind reels...
Rorey
(8,445 posts)I mean, the artists can't be sued because they're long gone, but could the museums be held accountable for being in possession of "child porn"?
Glorfindel
(9,729 posts)Here's a link and a partial transcript. At that time, he thought it was "cool."
https://www.npr.org/2008/07/23/92833535/once-naked-for-nirvana-now-a-teen-spirit
Rorey
(8,445 posts)This type of thing clogging up our courts is ridiculous.
LiberatedUSA
(1,666 posts)
the nudity has to be sexual in nature, otherwise almost all parents would be guilty of child porn.
The unfortunate side effect, is it allows nudism websites to exist, even though no real nudist would be interested in their content, let alone pay for it.
Rorey
(8,445 posts)I got confused with all of the articles. This one is from 2008:
https://www.npr.org/2008/07/23/92833535/once-naked-for-nirvana-now-a-teen-spirit
Rorey
(8,445 posts)It seems he was fine with it five years ago, and now he's not? It sounds like he's on a money grab.
https://www.goodnewsnetwork.org/baby-nirvana-album-cover-recreates-iconic-image-25-years-later/
AND in that 2016 article, it says the photographer "talked Elden out of doing the shoot naked like the original."
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)obamanut2012
(26,069 posts)FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_Z
Id also add, w this suit he is acting immaturely for his age
Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)He was born in the early 90s, just months before the album was released. Even the wiki article suggeste a Gen Zer is someone born no earlier than the mid-90s. Even that is pushing it, imo, as I feel someone born in 1991 is probably a lot closer to someone born in 1985 than, say, someone born in 2010 (beyond just age, of course).
FreepFryer
(7,077 posts)And remain bemused by all this entitled shit while I live my latch key life
Thanks Obamanut and Drunken
Celerity
(43,349 posts)Boomers 1946-1964
Gen X 1965-1980
Millennials 1981-1996
Gen Z 1997-2012 (end date is starting to coalesce)
Gen Alpha 2013-?
There are a few micro gens that many acknowledge
Generation Jones (late Boomers, say born 1958-1964)
Blank or Skip years (Born in 1965 and 1966, this is widely used in Sweden and other Euro countries)
Xennials or Carter Babies or Generation Catalano (born 1977 to 1980)
Zennials/Zillennials (born 1992-1998)
I do a lot of work with demography and the main gen boundaries (other than the end date for Gen Z) are pretty much etched in stone by now.
moose65
(3,166 posts)After reading the articles, it seems to me that he might have a better case if he sued them for using his image without his permission, rather than child porn. If his parents were paid only $200 and they never signed anything for the use of the image, it seems like he might have a case.
Progressive Jones
(6,011 posts)Tarc
(10,476 posts)10th (inset) and 15th
25th
Fuck that grifter.
Rorey
(8,445 posts)Poor traumatized guy
roamer65
(36,745 posts)Happy Hoosier
(7,304 posts)Not every picture of a penis is porn. I predict this suit is summarily dismissed.