Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cinematicdiversions

(1,969 posts)
Wed Aug 25, 2021, 08:22 AM Aug 2021

Man Photographed as Baby on 'Nevermind' Cover Sues Nirvana, Alleging Child Pornography

Spencer Elden, the man whose unusual baby portrait was used for one of the most recognizable album covers of all time, Nirvana’s “Nevermind,” filed a lawsuit Tuesday alleging that the nude image constituted child pornography.

Now my question is if you have this album in Itunes will the Iphone Child Porn photo cloud tracker alert authorities to your possession of child porn?

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Man Photographed as Baby on 'Nevermind' Cover Sues Nirvana, Alleging Child Pornography (Original Post) cinematicdiversions Aug 2021 OP
Source?? Link?? USALiberal Aug 2021 #1
Here you go Bettie Aug 2021 #3
He's claiming he couldn't consent because he was 1. However, his parents did consent. Case over. FSogol Aug 2021 #6
Per the article, it's not really clear ... Whiskeytide Aug 2021 #25
Thank you!!! USALiberal Aug 2021 #11
Sorry was on phone couldn't figure out link thing. NT cinematicdiversions Aug 2021 #8
I know the feeling Bettie Aug 2021 #13
Well Rorey Aug 2021 #2
Just imagine the impact on Renaissance paintings of Madonna and Child Glorfindel Aug 2021 #7
I was thinking of that too Rorey Aug 2021 #9
Mr. Elden was interviewed on NPR about this photo in 2008 Glorfindel Aug 2021 #4
Yup, it was "cool" all those years Rorey Aug 2021 #21
Under our laws... LiberatedUSA Aug 2021 #5
Correction Rorey Aug 2021 #10
In 2016 Elden recreated the image Rorey Aug 2021 #12
OK, Z-Genner. (Nt) FreepFryer Aug 2021 #14
He is a Millennial obamanut2012 Aug 2021 #16
Born in the 90s? I would call him Z gen. FreepFryer Aug 2021 #17
He's more aligned with a Millennial, I'd say (as one). Drunken Irishman Aug 2021 #22
As a gen X'er I pride myself on my ability to acknowledge your superior argument FreepFryer Aug 2021 #23
Here are the widely accepted (including in most academia) gen boundaries Celerity Aug 2021 #28
Weird moose65 Aug 2021 #15
Another scrounge trying to get money for nothing. nt Progressive Jones Aug 2021 #18
Lol, yet he had no issues recreating the pic on the anniversaries? Tarc Aug 2021 #19
Oh, gosh....he looks SO distressed in those recreation pics Rorey Aug 2021 #20
Doesn't help your case when you have the album title tattooed on ur chest. roamer65 Aug 2021 #27
LOL WUT!? Happy Hoosier Aug 2021 #24
Shameless money grab Fullduplexxx Aug 2021 #26
He is suing the wrong bunch, he needs to be suing his parents. Chainfire Aug 2021 #29

FSogol

(45,484 posts)
6. He's claiming he couldn't consent because he was 1. However, his parents did consent. Case over.
Wed Aug 25, 2021, 08:34 AM
Aug 2021

Whiskeytide

(4,461 posts)
25. Per the article, it's not really clear ...
Wed Aug 25, 2021, 10:14 AM
Aug 2021

… that the parents consented. In a 2008 interview the father said the photographer (a friend) called him and said you can make $200 if you let me photograph your kid in the pool. They had a pool party and the photo was taken, and the parents never really knew what it was for until later.

Might be BS, and certainly you could say dad was stupid for not realizing the photo would have had some commercial purpose, but the failure to get the parents to sign a consent form backs up the murky circumstances.

Funny. I remember thinking at the time why would parents let their kid be in that photo. It’s bound to be weird when they grow up.

Rorey

(8,445 posts)
2. Well
Wed Aug 25, 2021, 08:28 AM
Aug 2021

I don't know enough about the intent of whoever decided to use that as a cover photo, but I guess I sort of shudder at the thought of what kind of door this kind of suit will open as far as baby photos go.

What I mean is, lots of parents take photos of their babies in the bath, or otherwise unclothed, and I've never before thought of the photos as being child pornography.

Glorfindel

(9,729 posts)
7. Just imagine the impact on Renaissance paintings of Madonna and Child
Wed Aug 25, 2021, 08:35 AM
Aug 2021

Museums would have to provide tiny aprons for their depictions of the Holy Infant. The mind reels...

Rorey

(8,445 posts)
9. I was thinking of that too
Wed Aug 25, 2021, 08:42 AM
Aug 2021

I mean, the artists can't be sued because they're long gone, but could the museums be held accountable for being in possession of "child porn"?

 

LiberatedUSA

(1,666 posts)
5. Under our laws...
Wed Aug 25, 2021, 08:33 AM
Aug 2021

…the nudity has to be sexual in nature, otherwise almost all parents would be guilty of child porn.

The unfortunate side effect, is it allows “nudism” websites to exist, even though no real nudist would be interested in their content, let alone pay for it.

Rorey

(8,445 posts)
12. In 2016 Elden recreated the image
Wed Aug 25, 2021, 09:01 AM
Aug 2021

It seems he was fine with it five years ago, and now he's not? It sounds like he's on a money grab.

https://www.goodnewsnetwork.org/baby-nirvana-album-cover-recreates-iconic-image-25-years-later/

AND in that 2016 article, it says the photographer "talked Elden out of doing the shoot naked like the original."

FreepFryer

(7,077 posts)
17. Born in the 90s? I would call him Z gen.
Wed Aug 25, 2021, 09:11 AM
Aug 2021
Generation Z (or Gen Z for short), colloquially also known as zoomers,[1][2] is the demographic cohort succeeding Millennials and preceding Generation Alpha. Researchers and popular media use the mid-to-late 1990s as starting birth years and the early 2010s as ending birth years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generation_Z


I’d also add, w this suit he is acting immaturely for his age
 

Drunken Irishman

(34,857 posts)
22. He's more aligned with a Millennial, I'd say (as one).
Wed Aug 25, 2021, 09:24 AM
Aug 2021

He was born in the early 90s, just months before the album was released. Even the wiki article suggeste a Gen Zer is someone born no earlier than the mid-90s. Even that is pushing it, imo, as I feel someone born in 1991 is probably a lot closer to someone born in 1985 than, say, someone born in 2010 (beyond just age, of course).

FreepFryer

(7,077 posts)
23. As a gen X'er I pride myself on my ability to acknowledge your superior argument
Wed Aug 25, 2021, 09:26 AM
Aug 2021

And remain bemused by all this entitled shit while I live my latch key life



Thanks Obamanut and Drunken

Celerity

(43,349 posts)
28. Here are the widely accepted (including in most academia) gen boundaries
Wed Aug 25, 2021, 11:35 AM
Aug 2021

Boomers 1946-1964
Gen X 1965-1980
Millennials 1981-1996
Gen Z 1997-2012 (end date is starting to coalesce)
Gen Alpha 2013-?

There are a few micro gens that many acknowledge

Generation Jones (late Boomers, say born 1958-1964)

Blank or Skip years (Born in 1965 and 1966, this is widely used in Sweden and other Euro countries)

Xennials or Carter Babies or Generation Catalano (born 1977 to 1980)

Zennials/Zillennials (born 1992-1998)

I do a lot of work with demography and the main gen boundaries (other than the end date for Gen Z) are pretty much etched in stone by now.

moose65

(3,166 posts)
15. Weird
Wed Aug 25, 2021, 09:11 AM
Aug 2021

After reading the articles, it seems to me that he might have a better case if he sued them for using his image without his permission, rather than child porn. If his parents were paid only $200 and they never signed anything for the use of the image, it seems like he might have a case.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
19. Lol, yet he had no issues recreating the pic on the anniversaries?
Wed Aug 25, 2021, 09:13 AM
Aug 2021

10th (inset) and 15th



25th




Fuck that grifter.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Man Photographed as Baby ...