Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dawson Leery

(19,348 posts)
Tue Sep 14, 2021, 11:20 PM Sep 2021

The God D**M GOP MUST PAY FOR THE RECALL!

This was a waste of 300 million dollars at minimum. The GOP should foot the bill.

They also must pay at the ballot box next year.

The law must be changed. There should be at least 33% of all voters agreeing to a recall.
Also, there must be a gap between each effort of at least one year. If the first attempt fails (not enough signatures), you wait another 12 months before being allowed to request another recall.

55 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The God D**M GOP MUST PAY FOR THE RECALL! (Original Post) Dawson Leery Sep 2021 OP
I have to say Skittles Sep 2021 #1
+1! Cha Sep 2021 #26
and uncontrolled fires BlueKentuckyGirl Sep 2021 #38
you got that right Skittles Sep 2021 #41
Party of Fiscal Responsibility, what a joke! nt Starfury Sep 2021 #2
Yes, they must! The State of CA should seize $300M zorbasd Sep 2021 #3
They wasted $300 million and the lunatics ended up tishaLA Sep 2021 #4
Not fair! Equomba Sep 2021 #11
They would need Jerry2144 Sep 2021 #16
Fine, for all I care! calimary Sep 2021 #30
We must change the recall process NOW JohnSJ Sep 2021 #5
If the Governor is recalled, the Lt. Governor is the successor. Period. OMGWTF Sep 2021 #14
Yes JohnSJ Sep 2021 #15
No, because there could be a Republican elected as Lt. Governor someday. Liberty Belle Sep 2021 #33
I disagree, and not likely in California if the Governor in Democratic. JohnSJ Sep 2021 #51
Sure it could happen. Deukmejian and Reagan were Reps elected. Schwarzenegger got 45% Liberty Belle Sep 2021 #54
If that person got the most votes in the general election, I have no problem with that. I have a JohnSJ Sep 2021 #55
And the Lt. Governor gets to appoint a temp Lt. Governor until a closed election confirms them. TheBlackAdder Sep 2021 #48
Yes. It's much worse than a frivolous lawsuit, yet I don't Ilsa Sep 2021 #45
I was thinking that we should wipe it off the face of the earth jmowreader Sep 2021 #49
Agreed. Equomba Sep 2021 #6
Welcome to DU, Equomba. nt littlemissmartypants Sep 2021 #8
"They also must pay at the ballot box next year." brooklynite Sep 2021 #7
11 reps spanone Sep 2021 #9
Just a few congressmen. Mr.Bill Sep 2021 #10
For sure Nunes and McCarthy have to go Bev54 Sep 2021 #23
Issa is back in Congress; he'organized the recall against Gray Davis that gave us Schwarzenegger. Liberty Belle Sep 2021 #34
Yay! They should pay for this. Nixie Sep 2021 #12
It really is offensive. Sogo Sep 2021 #13
you said 33% of voters should agree to recall. what is the percent now? nt orleans Sep 2021 #17
now they want a recount MFM008 Sep 2021 #18
I think the recall was a two-fold plan. Now they are going to begin the trumpiddle "stolen" approach C Moon Sep 2021 #19
They can try.. President Biden & VP Cha Sep 2021 #25
They certainly have become the party of unreality. I wonder when it will implode on them? C Moon Sep 2021 #27
In our Lifetime.. I hope! Cha Sep 2021 #28
BLUE STATE STRATEGY REPORT SniffSniffWhatsThat Sep 2021 #20
What IS the Blue state strategy report? Ursus Rex Sep 2021 #47
The poster seems to be dropping it in several threads Ohio Joe Sep 2021 #52
Without any penalty moondust Sep 2021 #21
Keep recalling and drain the coffers.... Part of the plan? flying_wahini Sep 2021 #22
YAY.. I take it you still have Gov Newsom!! Cha Sep 2021 #24
Agreed! That was an obscene waste of money and resources. Initech Sep 2021 #29
Yes, they met their goals mucifer Sep 2021 #31
And put the person being recalled on the list of candidates, so a small percent can't vote in a nut. Liberty Belle Sep 2021 #32
They don't pay for anything. EVER! Kablooie Sep 2021 #35
Actually the way it should be changed is that only those that were registered with the candidates cstanleytech Sep 2021 #36
The reimbursement too. Kire Sep 2021 #37
That section seems to cover this situation. I hope it holds. panader0 Sep 2021 #46
Recall winner should have more votes than the incumbent in order to win Fresh_Start Sep 2021 #39
I'm hoping that they will pay because right now, the Dems have Fresh_Start Sep 2021 #40
Republicans persist in the lie that they are "conservatives" Champp Sep 2021 #42
No money for the people, but always money for the GOP machinations to obtain wealth and power. Irish_Dem Sep 2021 #43
That should be a rule for recalls. I you initiate a recall and lose, you pay for it. nt Hotler Sep 2021 #44
THIS! Dawson Leery Sep 2021 #53
Agree 100% UCmeNdc Sep 2021 #50

BlueKentuckyGirl

(402 posts)
38. and uncontrolled fires
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 02:23 AM
Sep 2021

That money could have gone a long way towards fighting the fires that still burn in northern California.

tishaLA

(14,176 posts)
4. They wasted $300 million and the lunatics ended up
Tue Sep 14, 2021, 11:25 PM
Sep 2021

Making Gov Newsom even stronger. For act two, they'll shoot themselves in their dicks.

OMGWTF

(3,957 posts)
14. If the Governor is recalled, the Lt. Governor is the successor. Period.
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 12:10 AM
Sep 2021

That's the way it should be instead of the Rethug's skeevy attempt to slip a whack-o MAGAt into the governorship.

Liberty Belle

(9,535 posts)
33. No, because there could be a Republican elected as Lt. Governor someday.
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 01:20 AM
Sep 2021

But give a Governor an option to resign before the vote is certified, if he chooses, and allow the Lt. Gov to take office. If the Gov likes his Lt. Gov, this would be a way to avoid this fiasco, but still let a recall proceed if the Governor didn't have confidence in the Lt. Gov.

Liberty Belle

(9,535 posts)
54. Sure it could happen. Deukmejian and Reagan were Reps elected. Schwarzenegger got 45%
Thu Sep 16, 2021, 02:52 AM
Sep 2021

when he beat Gray Davis in a recall. Politics is cyclical -- if the pendulum swings to far in voters' eyes there is a backlash.

If we wanted to recall the next Schwarzenegger or Reagan, would you want a Rep to step in?

JohnSJ

(92,209 posts)
55. If that person got the most votes in the general election, I have no problem with that. I have a
Thu Sep 16, 2021, 07:01 AM
Sep 2021

problem with a recall system where a Governor could be removed, not for wrong doing, but ideological reasons, and an alternate candidate could get significantly less votes than the person they tried to remove, and bcecome Governor. Our recall process is inherently unDemocratic

They should also raise the signature requirement to at least 25% minimum. No other state that ha recalls has a threshold as low as we have it, 11%

There were 3 attempts to recall Newsom. This one succeeded with the help of a judge who extended the time to gather signatures by 3 months

The recall system is easy to abuse in California, and that is why the republicans have used it as their back door. It is also extremely expensive. This cost the state 250 million dollars.

Things have changed significantly from the examples you cite. We have jungle primaries, except for presidential elections where the top two vote getters in the primary, regardless of party, run against each other in the general election

We missed the bullet this time because people were paying attention

Another danger we need to be aware of is that republicans for years have been trying for years that in presidential general elections, it isn’t winner take all in electoral votes. Every so often they try to sneak that in through the initiative process.

They also have tried to cut up our state into several small states.














TheBlackAdder

(28,205 posts)
48. And the Lt. Governor gets to appoint a temp Lt. Governor until a closed election confirms them.
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 11:02 AM
Sep 2021

.

The party in power votes to decide the replacement. Not a general election.

.

Ilsa

(61,695 posts)
45. Yes. It's much worse than a frivolous lawsuit, yet I don't
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 09:33 AM
Sep 2021

hear GQP whining about it.

It is a waste of governors' time and party money.

jmowreader

(50,559 posts)
49. I was thinking that we should wipe it off the face of the earth
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 11:45 AM
Sep 2021

At the present time the Republicans in my county are trying to set up a recall for two Republican county commissioners. They aren’t far enough to the right for their taste.

Their sin was voting against a proposal to officially endorse the John Birch Society.

Forget about your suggestions to make the recall process better. The only cures for a bad elected official should be impeachment and loss of the next election.

 

Equomba

(197 posts)
6. Agreed.
Tue Sep 14, 2021, 11:29 PM
Sep 2021

Last edited Wed Sep 15, 2021, 01:07 AM - Edit history (1)

And I will leave it at that so as not to expose the more, in this case the more extremely so, vulgar aspects of my personality.

There is an election next year. Campaign, and if you've something worthwhile to say perhaps you will be supported by the majority. This was nothing more, nothing less, than a power grab. And I would have been equally offended if we had an R in office and the Dems pulled this.

brooklynite

(94,585 posts)
7. "They also must pay at the ballot box next year."
Tue Sep 14, 2021, 11:29 PM
Sep 2021

How many Republicans are left in California to be voted out?

Mr.Bill

(24,300 posts)
10. Just a few congressmen.
Tue Sep 14, 2021, 11:57 PM
Sep 2021

All statewide offices are held by Democrats. And we hold supermajorities in both houses of the legislature.

Liberty Belle

(9,535 posts)
34. Issa is back in Congress; he'organized the recall against Gray Davis that gave us Schwarzenegger.
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 01:22 AM
Sep 2021

Wondering how safe his seat will be after redistricting. Maybe lines will be drawn to give him part of liberal Imperial County.

Nixie

(16,954 posts)
12. Yay! They should pay for this.
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 12:05 AM
Sep 2021

What a pathetic farce.

Something is going to have to change. Millions more signatures required at the minimum.

Sogo

(4,986 posts)
13. It really is offensive.
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 12:09 AM
Sep 2021

How many of those homeless people (whom the Rs claim to care so much about) could have been helped, and in a BIG way, by spending $300 million on them????

MFM008

(19,814 posts)
18. now they want a recount
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 12:34 AM
Sep 2021

a recount of over 35 percent loss.........
was all that "rigging"...................

C Moon

(12,213 posts)
19. I think the recall was a two-fold plan. Now they are going to begin the trumpiddle "stolen" approach
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 12:36 AM
Sep 2021

and they will do this with every election, to make the Dems look like cheaters. A Sleight of hand trick.

Cha

(297,275 posts)
25. They can try.. President Biden & VP
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 12:57 AM
Sep 2021

Harris says Differently.

Fuck 'em if they can't live in REALT Y.

Ohio Joe

(21,756 posts)
52. The poster seems to be dropping it in several threads
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 04:07 PM
Sep 2021

No explanation, no seeming relation. I've tried doing some searches but... Nothing.

moondust

(19,988 posts)
21. Without any penalty
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 12:47 AM
Sep 2021

they'll just keep doing it all over the place. At least until TFG dies and goes to Hell and his cult is Gone With The Whigs.

Make them pay! And fix the law to prevent such legal abuses.

Cha

(297,275 posts)
24. YAY.. I take it you still have Gov Newsom!!
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 12:54 AM
Sep 2021

And, Yes GD right Damn MAGAts need t PAY for that Shit in $$$$$$$$ & at the Ballet BOX!

Liberty Belle

(9,535 posts)
32. And put the person being recalled on the list of candidates, so a small percent can't vote in a nut.
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 01:17 AM
Sep 2021

So if a majority had voted to recall Newsom, he could still have stayed in office as long as he got more votes than any other candidate due to votes split many ways.

Also prohibit recalls in the last year of an office-holder's term.

Limit the grounds for recall to only serious charges of malfeasance such as findings or crimes or corruption - not just because you disagree with handling of issues. Dems didn't like Schwarzenegger but didn't waste taxpayer money on a recall, for Pete's sake.

Kablooie

(18,634 posts)
35. They don't pay for anything. EVER!
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 01:26 AM
Sep 2021

They are the party that is never held responsible for anything.
They can spend other people's money and openly commit crimes but they will never suffer consequences.
That's why they are the way they are. If there were consequences for their actions they would act responsibly but there never are so they don't.

cstanleytech

(26,293 posts)
36. Actually the way it should be changed is that only those that were registered with the candidates
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 02:20 AM
Sep 2021

party in the past election that put them into office may sign up for such a recall petition and it should take 15% of them to start the ball rolling.
Then when it comes time to cast the vote at the polls on if they should be removed from office only those that were again registered of the same party at the time of the last election may vote on if they should be removed and it should take 55% or more to vote to remove them.
Otherwise the only other way to remove them should be via impeachment for committing a crime just like every other politician and we can hopefully avoid a repeat of this partisan hack show by the Republicans to remove a candidate that won a fair election.

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
39. Recall winner should have more votes than the incumbent in order to win
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 03:28 AM
Sep 2021

or recall should result in the Lt Gov becoming Gov rather than someone else entirely.

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
40. I'm hoping that they will pay because right now, the Dems have
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 03:31 AM
Sep 2021

a trained and excited team of volunteers with only a year to the next election.

Irish_Dem

(47,114 posts)
43. No money for the people, but always money for the GOP machinations to obtain wealth and power.
Wed Sep 15, 2021, 09:09 AM
Sep 2021

Killing American citizens, stealing tax dollars for political purposes.

This is all fine for the GOP mob bosses.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The God D**M GOP MUST PAY...