Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 943 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Louis Gohmert is such a total asshat. That is all. n/t (Original Post)
CincyDem
Oct 2021
OP
It's called Representative Democracy for a reason. He represents the plurality of his district. 🤡
TheBlackAdder
Oct 2021
#3
JustAnotherGen
(31,818 posts)1. I have no idea
What he's getting on about. Seriously - who cares what you did? He's so self-absorbed.
malaise
(268,968 posts)2. Neither does he
TheBlackAdder
(28,189 posts)3. It's called Representative Democracy for a reason. He represents the plurality of his district. 🤡
marble falls
(57,080 posts)6. Representing the mediocre is a longstanding tradition in the US ...
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/mccains-hruskaism-the-med_b_136934
McCain's "Hruskaism:" The Mediocre People of America Deserve Representation!
McCain's Hruskaist contention boils down to this: Why have an extraordinary person for president, when you can have an ordinary one?
Robert McElvaine
Historian, writer, feminist and progressive activist
11/22/2008 05:12am EST | Updated December 6, 2017
?ops=scalefit_720_noupscale&format=webp
2008-10-22-Mediocrity.jpg
In 1970, when Richard Nixon nominated Court of Appeals Judge G. Harrold Carswell of Florida to the United States Supreme Court, there was an outcry that Carswell was not a jurist of the caliber required for the nation's highest tribunal.
Nearly 60 percent of Carswell's decisions as a District Court Judge had been overturned. Critics charged that he was, at best, mediocre, and therefore unqualified to sit on the Supreme Court.
Republican Senator Roman Hruska of Nebraska leapt to Carswell's defense.
''Even if he were mediocre,'' Mr. Hruska declared, ''there are a lot of mediocre judges and people and lawyers. They are entitled to a little representation, aren't they, and a little chance? We can't have all Brandeises, Frankfurters and Cardozos.''
Hruska's argument was an interesting one, but the elitists in the Senate decided to deny representation on the high court to the mediocre people of America, even though Judge Carswell demonstrated that he was qualified because he could see the Supreme Court from his front porch. (OK, not really.)
-snip-
McCain's "Hruskaism:" The Mediocre People of America Deserve Representation!
McCain's Hruskaist contention boils down to this: Why have an extraordinary person for president, when you can have an ordinary one?
Robert McElvaine
Historian, writer, feminist and progressive activist
11/22/2008 05:12am EST | Updated December 6, 2017
?ops=scalefit_720_noupscale&format=webp
2008-10-22-Mediocrity.jpg
In 1970, when Richard Nixon nominated Court of Appeals Judge G. Harrold Carswell of Florida to the United States Supreme Court, there was an outcry that Carswell was not a jurist of the caliber required for the nation's highest tribunal.
Nearly 60 percent of Carswell's decisions as a District Court Judge had been overturned. Critics charged that he was, at best, mediocre, and therefore unqualified to sit on the Supreme Court.
Republican Senator Roman Hruska of Nebraska leapt to Carswell's defense.
''Even if he were mediocre,'' Mr. Hruska declared, ''there are a lot of mediocre judges and people and lawyers. They are entitled to a little representation, aren't they, and a little chance? We can't have all Brandeises, Frankfurters and Cardozos.''
Hruska's argument was an interesting one, but the elitists in the Senate decided to deny representation on the high court to the mediocre people of America, even though Judge Carswell demonstrated that he was qualified because he could see the Supreme Court from his front porch. (OK, not really.)
-snip-
rsdsharp
(9,170 posts)10. I remember Hruska, well. He supported Nixon to the very end, and beyond.
Even after Nixon has resigned, Hruska was supportive.
His list of justices we cant have all of were not just exceptional justices. They were all jewish. Im sure that was just a coincidence (cough).
marble falls
(57,080 posts)11. Hruska was consistent and deeply mediocre.
harumph
(1,898 posts)12. Being mediocre for Palin would have been a stretch
Sneederbunk
(14,290 posts)4. Texasshat.
marble falls
(57,080 posts)5. Thanks for the heads up. Texas is full of asshats.
packman
(16,296 posts)7. Please - I know it's Louie, but some reference
Is this new asshatery or old asshatery?? Or just simple, everyday asshatery by Louie?
CincyDem
(6,355 posts)8. Garland hearing....
It's likely "simple, everyday asshatery" but I typically make an effort to not expose myself to his speechifying.
Bev54
(10,051 posts)9. I missed the beginning of the hearing, so I did not hear or see it but
One of the dem rep's referenced his outrage at Gohmer's comparison of the lawful and peaceful walks of protest of John Lewis with the attack on the capitol. I suspect that is what it is about.