General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMagickMuffin
(15,936 posts)I thought well, what if he IS the source. Watched what was happening in real time.
Bev54
(10,051 posts)He has dug up a lot of very good information and he is only now getting the recognition of his work.
Kid Berwyn
(14,897 posts)Somehow the source became the issue, not the fact theses traitors were organized and active.
triron
(22,001 posts)ancianita
(36,048 posts)Other than that I know nothing about him. (sorry I can't get all the photos up)
https://cdn.substack.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F5f456087-9def-4335-a589-6c82ad418598_1204x904.jpeg
SergeStorms
(19,199 posts)you can bet Ghouliani was there. He does his best thinking when he's plastered. Or at least he thinks he does.
MagickMuffin
(15,936 posts)Evolve Dammit
(16,725 posts)ramifications of this? We lose democracy and they will be eliminated if 45 gets re-whatever. "MSM" will cease to be.
ancianita
(36,048 posts)that authoritarian minority ruled governments get rid of pesky journalists and media that hadn't been loyal all along.
Evolve Dammit
(16,725 posts)Just profits. Fuck the truth. Sorry, but it's just gross. Aside from a few shows, it's woefully lacking in actual reporting. I find "Democracy Now" the best radio news source presently. Still love Rachel, and the MSNBC lineup on cable.
monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)wnylib
(21,441 posts)they would do a better job of reporting now. Since they don't have principles, they would easily adjust to a dictatorial regime and gleefully report only what was approved.
Rebl2
(13,498 posts)thought that too, so guess they are okay with government run news media and not being allowed to report on what they want.
Evolve Dammit
(16,725 posts)Rebl2
(13,498 posts)moniss
(4,231 posts)MSM will be way behind the curve. It still boggles me that with huge stories going on in South America etc. that we see little to no coverage and certainly nothing in-depth or sustained for a period.
wnylib
(21,441 posts)emotional, psychological, and intellectual development, reporting on the latest gossip stories. There aren't enough neurons between them to produce an in depth thought.
triron
(22,001 posts)so well put. Thank you.
gab13by13
(21,323 posts)that the MSM isn't the one dropping the ball. Everything we are learning about the coup has come from reporters.
MY QUESTION ONCE AGAIN, where is our DOJ? We don't have a clue if it is even investigating an attack on our democracy.
8 months ago yet no word of any grand jury hearings.
Malcolmb Nance was just on Joy and he said the same thing that I just said, "I hope that DOJ is investigating this."
maxsolomon
(33,327 posts)if they were just "planning the rally"?
DickKessler
(364 posts)If investigators can't find that or other clear documentary evidence, then it'd be hard to prove any criminal conspiracy.
They would need to be able to demonstrate not just clear and convincing links from the Capitol attackers to Trump, his staffers, and Republican Congressmembers, but also that Trump, his staffers, and the Republican Congressmembers knew that they intended violent and criminal activity within the Capitol and either failed to prevent it, or worse, actively encouraged it.
I think this would be hard to prove, but I'm not a a lawyer or anything like that so eh...
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)over the months and from different sources. Abramson does a good job putting it all together in an organized fashion.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,601 posts)He didnt have any sourced info on the details of the meetings.
PurgedVoter
(2,217 posts)Gotta give it the name if you want traction. This make is real to those folk that can only real headlines.
monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)reACTIONary
(5,770 posts).... Abramson claims to be engaged in "curated journalism". This means his self described modus operandi is to cull through other reporters' stories and to "connect the dots" based on them. So I would expect that for the last eight months there has been a lot of news reports concerning the Willard war room that he based his own reporting on.
Did he do original reporting in this case? Or was he doing his typical cut-n-paste curating?
wiggs
(7,812 posts)dchill
(38,481 posts)Hell, you were the man 8 months ago.
When Rep. Liz Cheney uttered the words citing "war room, Willard Hotel" in her statement on the floor of Congress.... these words immediately came to my mind:
"Seth Abramson."
Those following him have known about the meetings for months.
triron
(22,001 posts)May be too late.