General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJudge says defense cannot refer to the people Rittenhouse killed as victims.
Maybe they should just refer to them as "This person that you killed" and "That person that you killed" ???
https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/ct-kyle-rittenhouse-murder-trial-looters-rioters-prosecutors-20211025-3vr7rdlo6zbzhmdsz3bvol4kxm-story.html
Kyle Rittenhouses lawyers can refer to the men he shot as rioters and looters, but prosecutors still may not call them victims at any time during the teens upcoming murder trial, a judge ruled Monday.
Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder cautioned the defense team against using pejorative terms during opening statements, but he said they could use them in their closing arguments if the evidence suggested the men engaged in criminal acts.
He can demonize them if he wants, if he thinks it will win points with the jury, Schroeder said.
Rittenhouse has pleaded not guilty to the charges and says he acted in self-defense when he fatally shot Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber and wounded Gaige Grosskreutz in August 2020.
dsc
(52,162 posts)themaguffin
(3,826 posts)Fullduplexxx
(7,863 posts)forgotmylogin
(7,528 posts)Fullduplexxx
(7,863 posts)Wisconsin judge sides with fascists and denies motion for rearrest and bail increase for killer Rittenhouse
Kevin Reed
11 February 2021
On Thursday, a Wisconsin circuit court judge denied a request by Kenosha prosecutors for a warrant to rearrest and increase the bail of the fascist killer Kyle Rittenhouse by $200,000. The motion was filed after it was revealed that the teenage shooter had violated his release agreement by concealing his whereabouts from the court.
Judge Bruce E. Schroeder abruptly shut down the virtual hearing after he sided with Rittenhouse and his attorney Mark Richards and repeatedly interrupted Assistant District Attorney (ADA) Thomas Bingers attempt to explain that the accused murderer was thumbing his nose at the terms of his bond.
qazplm135
(7,447 posts)The presumption of innocence is never going to allow a prosecution to get any closer than alleged victim.
2naSalit
(86,611 posts)tenderfoot
(8,432 posts)eom
3catwoman3
(23,985 posts)Not a legal eagle of any kind. Is this standard?
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Gore1FL
(21,132 posts)BeerBarrelPolka
(1,202 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,231 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,231 posts)This judge is making bad rulings and is upset that people disagree with these bad rulings
Link to tweet