On Ayman show: Justice Dept. won't charge Burr over stock sales.

[sprinkleeninow]

I have no link.

[Tribetime]

1. If this is true Garland must go now

[sprinkleeninow]

3. No charges were brought initially in January 2021, but the SEC is still investigating.

I should've researched the timeline.

Excerpt: Although federal prosecutors decided not to charge Sen. Burr with any sort of crime, ProPublica’s new report says the recent SEC filings revealed that there is an ongoing insider trading investigation into both Burr and Fauth’s trades.

ProPublica says this information comes “as part of an effort by the SEC to force Fauth to comply with a subpoena that the agency said he has stonewalled for more than a year”.

Attribution: WBTV

[JustAnotherGen]

5. Wasn't Garland who made the decision

This was done in 2020.

[malaise]

8. Barr

just before the Slobfather had to leave the WH

[Yoyoyo77]

2. I saw this on the show live. The decision was made while Trump was still president.

[sprinkleeninow]

4. It was then, yes. Before Pres. Biden took the reins from FFFF.

Former 'Expletive' Forty Five...

[Disaffected]

6. FFFF, I like that.

Could call him 4F for short.

[rockfordfile]

7. There was another right-winger that should be arrested

[harumph]

9. They can rescind the Barr decision not to prosecute

Burr clearly provided insider info to his fucking fuck brother-in-law who dumped stocks
on account of Burr's tip.
Nothing is set in stone. Certainly not
ethics rules as we have learned. Garland can prosecute if he
wants despite a prior DOJ decision.

[sprinkleeninow]

10. Loaded words. May/Can/WILL. I've learned to differentiate bc of

media use of these words.

It can be done as you put forth (thank you), but will it. That's the $64k question.

We shall see...