Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo what was "the big news"that the DoJ was supposed to have @ 1:30 PM?
thanx
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1242 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So what was "the big news"that the DoJ was supposed to have @ 1:30 PM? (Original Post)
Botany
Nov 2021
OP
secondwind
(16,903 posts)1. All I know is that I just read that Michael Flynn has been served.
MontanaMama
(23,370 posts)6. Wait. What?
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)2. They have arrested some ransom hackers over the past few months.
AZSkiffyGeek
(11,218 posts)4. Why didn't they tell anyone they were doing this before the arrests? NT
gab13by13
(21,527 posts)5. I could not agree more, well said.
It took 2 years before Don McGahen testified that gives Mr. Garland plenty of time.
brooklynite
(95,104 posts)3. Posted at noon