General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Time Has Come to Pick a Side
I grew up in the era of Walter Cronkite and Edward R. Murrow, a time when TV newscasters used a "just the facts, ma'am" approach to delivering the news -without editorial comment, and without regard to the political opinions of their employers.
But that was before TV journalism devolved into newsotainment, before news outlets relied on flashy sets and flash-card chyrons to garner an audience. More importantly, it was before both-siderism became the norm, and "fair and balanced" came to mean neither.
It would be nice if we could go back to a time when the political events of the day were recounted without the pretense that the statements and actions of those on one side of the political aisle need to be countered with something presented as equally egregious from the other side.
It would be of great service to our nation if - by way of glaring example - the January 6th insurrection was not compared to citizens protesting racial injustice. The latter was a means of drawing attention to a just cause - the former was an attempt to overthrow our democracy - and any effort to equate the two is, by default, "taking a side".
Having grown up in the days when the news actually was premised on not taking sides, I never thought I would say the following. But given where we are as a nation, and given that there are no means by which we can go back to truly neutral reportage, it actually IS a time when journalists have to pick a side and report accordingly.
This IS the time when bothsiderism has to be struck down, a time when the words and actions of the party that incited, supported, funded and continues to defend an attack on our democracy are relentlessly driven home, without any spineless, mealy-mouthed mutterings about how their behaviour has to be somehow weighed and measured against the behaviour of those who oppose them.
There is no longer any wiggle room left for newscasters and/or journalists. There are no longer any sidelines on which to park your asses and comment from, as though you have no skin in the game. There is no neutral territory to run to because you're too afraid to speak the truth.
The Republicans are anxious for civil war, and are using every means possible to incite it.
So it's time to pick which side you're on - because the way things are going, the day may come when you might not have a choice at all.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)sources? I'm a little lost here.
I am saying we need to abolish the way the MSM presents the material their sources have come up with.
There always seems to be a need on the part of the MSM to equalize what the (D)s are doing with what the (R)s are doing, as though inciting an insurrection against our democracy is somehow equivalent to protesting George Floyd's murder.
As I said, it's time to pick a side. Does the MSM step up and acknowledge that "one of these things is not like the other" - or do they continue to pretend that this is just another classic example that "both sides do it"?
I apologize if I've not made myself clear - that is the fault of the writer, not the reader.
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Make the comparison between 1/6 and the protests in the summer of 2000 and the media reports there views at times. Unless you're watching Fox news.
But I guess you have a point that trying for objectivity sometimes just results in wishy washiness.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)... for being so unclear.
Yes, it's the Republicans who are making the comparison between 1/6 and the summer of 2000 - so the question remains as to why the MSM is adopting that stance as a valid position.
IMHO, if you're a newscaster/journalist who is promoting that kind of bothsiderism, you've already chosen to be on the side of "facts don't matter". And if you're not on-side with the facts, exactly whose side are you on?
SouthernDem4ever
(6,617 posts)They will always pick the side with the money. There are a few good outlets left, just a few.
usaf-vet
(6,189 posts)....repeatedly ask young men and women to pick up arms and go to fight wars AND yes, die so you and others like you can keep your cushy job with big $$$ attached.
Pick an F...ing side, you greedy coward!
You and the rest of your "newsotainment" comrades who don't have enough courage to honor the sacrifices these very young people make so you can stay out of the line of fire and play with FREE speech, which is never free.
jpak
(41,758 posts)You are a treasure.
NanceGreggs
(27,815 posts)... but I am hardly a 'treasure'.
I'm just an ordinary American speaking out in extraordinary times - and I am not alone in doing so.
Roisin Ni Fiachra
(2,574 posts)right before I read your post, and was thinking the same thing.
The MSM is blatantly catering to RW aggression, and as a result, they are incrementally, and insidiously, normalizing fascism.