General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStarbucks launches aggressive anti-union effort as upstate New York stores organize
Will Westlake, a Starbucks barista in Hamburg, New York, whose store recently filed for a union election, was told by a manager he could attend an earlier mandatory anti-union meeting on 8 November because he was scheduled to work early the next day.
The meeting was in a nearby hotel and when Westlake arrived he found out he was the only worker in attendance, with six members of Starbucks management. The meeting lasted for about one hour.
That was basically how my last anti-union meeting was, totally separated from the rest of my co-workers and having to be surrounded, said Westlake. They started off by going around and saying that they wanted me to vote no for the union. And then they went back and forth talking about how great all the benefits are at Starbucks and if we vote in a union, we may not have any of those benefits.
Westlake emphasized the numerous anti-union meetings have been framed as listening sessions, but its the workers who have been doing most of the listening: the sessions have largely consisted of management presenting anti-union talking points, with little feedback from workers involved.
Westlakes experience is just one part of an aggressive anti-union campaign run by the giant coffee chain as six Starbucks stores in the Buffalo, New York, area have filed for union elections with the National Labor Relations Board in recent weeks. If successful, the stores would be the first Starbucks corporate locations to unionize in the US.
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2021/nov/23/starbucks-aggressive-anti-union-effort-new-york-stores-organize
irisblue
(32,973 posts)moose65
(3,166 posts)So, each individual Starbucks store has to file and then to vote for the union? That seems like a tall order to me. Couldn't Starbucks corporate just flood the stores with "new hires" to dilute the votes of people who already work there?
And I thought Starbucks was supposedly a "liberal" company????
Ka-Dinh Oy
(11,686 posts)Weird