General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDick Durbin To GOP: Our Turn To Confirm Judicial Nominees Without Your Consent
The Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday kicked off the first nominations hearing of the year with a message for Republicans: Were moving forward with one of President Joe Bidens court picks without your consent, and its because you did this to us.
Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) scheduled the hearing for Andre Mathis, Bidens pick for a lifetime seat on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit. Durbin acknowledged that both of Mathis home-state senators, Tennessee GOP Sens. Marsha Blackburn and Bill Hagerty, oppose his nomination and signaled as much by not turning in their so-called blue slips to the committee.
It used to be a Senate tradition that, in the name of collegiality, the Judiciary Committee would not advance a judicial nominee until both senators from that nominees home state turned in a blue piece of paper signaling they were on board with doing so. But Republicans ignored that tradition for appeals court nominees when Donald Trump was president and when the GOP controlled the Senate 18 times, to be exact which resulted in 17 of those nominees sailing through the committee and to confirmation over Democratic objections.
What goes around comes around, Durbin basically said Wednesday.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/dick-durbin-gop-turn-confirm-232122215.html
ffr
(22,671 posts)and purge everyone and anyone you can who was nominated by TFG and Mitch McConnell.
This is wonderful news!
Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)
Chin music This message was self-deleted by its author.
Slammer
(714 posts)I'm ashamed, bothered, and angry that we've been backed into a corner so that we have to do this in order to get anything done.
I'm not ashamed, bothered, or angry that we're doing it.
The Republicans used to have norms of behavior in Washington. But frankly, those were breaking down before Trump ever showed up on the scenes. So he's only accelerated it.
kimbutgar
(21,181 posts)Im happy to see out Democrats finally saying enough and fighting back!
Good on you Senator Durbin.
Escurumbele
(3,401 posts)Democrats need to understand that if republicans get a chance to screw Democrats, they will without a 2nd thought, so get ahead of the game and do things right.
The "Presidential Pardon" also has to be modified, a president should not be able to pardon people who committed fraud and other high crimes, no wonder why so many crooks run for office and pander to criminals like trump.
mcar
(42,372 posts)childfreebychoice
(476 posts)Of a dictator, king, or magician to pres Biden. An aside, disgusted that Abrams snubbed the pres and VP. She is a lawyer, ran for office, and should have better understanding of how gov works. Picket
Sinema and and manchin, not the pres
lark
(23,147 posts)9 SCOTUS was approved at a time when there were 9 judicial districts, so one for each, easy. Now there are 14 (I think that is the number?) districts and still 9 jurists. Expand the court to 14 to return to the HISTORICAL NORM!
mcar
(42,372 posts)I don't disagree that we need more jurists on SCOTUS - the poster insisted Biden should do it. I'm asking how.
lark
(23,147 posts)I am definitely of 2 minds on this. Part of me thinks the Nazis can't be deterred and we are in serious trouble. Another part thinks that the Jan.6 hearings could move the needle enough that Mancin/Sienema might be moved to stop acting like they are in a different party on some critical issues and actually support our democracy.
There are 13 districts, so the SCOTUS justices are out of balance when it comes to overseeing those.
But yes, that in and of itself is a valid reason to do so. And a couple of the districts are large enough that they need to be split...
Unfortunately, this would be filibustered, and you know that certain recalcitrant senators aren't going to be on board with changing that rule/nuking it. Then, there's the certainty that if we expanded the SCOTUS, the next time the Repukes had full control, they would almost certainly either shrink it, or simply expand it further, just to put it further out of whack in their favor.
An alternative would be to strip the SCOTUS of its appellate jurisdiction (which Congress can do), with the exception of the SCOTUS' original jurisdiction, and create a new, constitutional appellate court (also within Congress' constitutional authority). Then make all justices on each court rotating for a certain number of years from off of the regular federal bench (they'd still be lifetime, federal judges, so not a violation of the Constitutional requirement for lifetime appointments, which would have the effect of helping to minimize politicization of the courts). Again, this would be subject to Repuke filibuster, so we're back to square one.
lark
(23,147 posts)I edited my post with a little more info. You might find that interesting...
😉
lark
(23,147 posts)Like you, I currently don't see either of Mancin/Sienema detaching themselves from their corporate interests/donors enough to actually support democracy.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)That said, let's work toward that goal.
cstanleytech
(26,318 posts)means all the Democrats would have to agree to get a tie that the VP can then break and my bet is that 2 of the Democratic Senators would end up siding with the Republicans which means no tie to break.
monkeyman1
(5,109 posts)PatSeg
(47,573 posts)Democrats have had enough and they just aren't going to take it anymore. Meanwhile, I think Biden has helped set the tone for others to follow. There's too much at stake to cater to a party that wouldn't do the same for Democrats.
I would prefer that they were civil, but you can't be civil with people who are incapable of civility.
OMGWTF
(3,972 posts)PatSeg
(47,573 posts)I wonder how much pushback Truman got from republicans back then.
TomDaisy
(1,899 posts)TomDaisy
(1,899 posts)Especially black women.
Stuart G
(38,439 posts)BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)Republicans shredded that tradition on their way to establishing a hostile workplace in Washington DC.
Fuck them, we need as many judges installed as there are vacancies to fill.
lastlib
(23,272 posts)You want collegiality, stop being those people.
Historic NY
(37,452 posts)Beartracks
(12,821 posts)Weirdly, the MSM will of course only complain of this being "partisan" when Democrats are doing it. According to the MSM, the role of conservatives is to be hard-nosed assholes, and the role of liberals is to play fair. FTS. "What goes around comes around," indeed -- and it can't happen soon enough. We've got a system of checks and balances that needs checking and balancing.
==========
James48
(4,438 posts)Stand up!
Hekate
(90,779 posts)mushroomhunter
(91 posts)keep it up - thank you Dick Durbin!
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Turnabout is fair play.
Mr. Ected
(9,670 posts)Attention needs to be drawn to the un-American manner in which Congressional Republicans conducted themselves under Trump. They have a tendency to forget their malice and their history when they attack us, and this is the best REMINDER that they started the war, not us.
RussBLib
(9,034 posts)Blackburn is a disgrace. She is just one of so many unqualified people in office, especially in the GOP.
She is such a southern hypocrite. Anything for Trump. Nothing for the Dems.
SWBTATTReg
(22,156 posts)review candidates and then approve / disprove them to the Judiciary, NO MORE. Republicans broke tradition and I think that they are going to be sick and tired of the color BLUE.
DinahMoeHum
(21,806 posts)Payback is a motherfucker, GOoPers.
70sEraVet
(3,508 posts)I'll sleep better tonight knowing that they are pissed off.