Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

eridani

(51,907 posts)
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 06:40 AM Oct 2012

Will SCOTUS Make It Illegal to Resell Your Stuff?

http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/320-80/14172-will-scotus-make-it-illegal-to-resell-your-stuff

you buy an iPod or a phone, a book or a DVD, it's currently legal to resell it, as thousands of eBay and Craigslist posts attest.

However, as Jennifer Waters at MarketWatch reports, a little-known case "tucked into the U.S. Supreme Court's agenda this fall could upend your ability to resell everything from your grandmother's antique furniture to your iPhone 4."

Under current law - on the books since 1908 - copyright holders only have control over the first sale, so while I cannot take iPhones straight off the factory line and sell them, I am able to sell a device that I first bought from a retailer.

This, Waters reports, is being challenged:
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

aquart

(69,014 posts)
1. Not if eBay knows how to set up secret accounts in the Channel Islands.
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 06:57 AM
Oct 2012

Switzerland just doesn't feel secure anymore.

And I expect Seal Team Six to take over the Caymans any day.

BadgerKid

(4,554 posts)
2. It seems today's "innovation" is
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 07:23 AM
Oct 2012

market expansion into rentables and consumables -- reduce everything into a monthly payment or buy-and-throw-away.

htuttle

(23,738 posts)
3. This would be completely unworkable
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 07:25 AM
Oct 2012

Other than creating the largest black market in history overnight, it would screw more corporations than it would help. The normal channels of retail distribution involve resale from the factory to a distributor to a retail store.

While the scenario described would be an extreme application of this ruling, I've seen the courts act so stupidly in my lifetime that I can't rule it out.

 

HiPointDem

(20,729 posts)
5. so that ordinary people never really 'own' anything. violation of private property. private
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 07:38 AM
Oct 2012

property is something only the state, large corporations or the very wealthy 'own'.

ironic.

i agree with the commenter:

'There it is, proof positive that the Right Wing agenda destroys all the freedoms and rights that they claim they defend.'

 

RevStPatrick

(2,208 posts)
6. Aw sheesh, not this shit again!
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 08:14 AM
Oct 2012

This case has nothing to do with reselling your frikkin' iPod.
It has to do with a guy who was buying large amounts of textbooks real cheap overseas and selling them at a large markup here in the US.

The Supreme Court is not going to make it illegal to resell your iPod!
It is, however, illegal to import stuff illegally.
That's the point of this...

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
7. It's looking that way. There's almost NOTHING you can buy that doesn't include foreign parts.
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 09:35 AM
Oct 2012

It basically means you cant re-sell a car. You can't resell anything made from pine harvested in Canada. Hell, it would put $tarbuck$ and Hershey out of business - we don't grow coffee or cocoa here.

It's all up to this Robert's/Scalia court and I don't trust them as far as I could throw them (which isn't very far). I don't think very many people understand how draconian this is. The "buy it and you're stuck with it" concept is just a recipe for accumulating more trash in our already overwhelmed landfills and incinerators.

dawg

(10,624 posts)
8. If you make it so that I can never truly *own* something ...
Fri Oct 26, 2012, 09:39 AM
Oct 2012

then the concept of "stealing" no longer has any meaning to me.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Will SCOTUS Make It Illeg...