General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA turn in the Russian War in Ukraine nobody is talking about yet
Everyone knows that Russia has a much larger military than Ukraine and that the Ukrainians have a lot more motivation to defend their homeland. Those factors have seen this war drag on much longer than Putin had initially expected. However, if things keep going as they are, Russia will eventually overrun the Ukrainian Capital and most of the country and this will become a gorilla war situation just as the Ukrainian fighters have promised. They will never give up the fight.
My question is at what point do these Ukrainian fights take the fight to the Russian Homeland? Right now, I see the reasons not to take such an action as it would be an escalation that Russia could use to justify their aggression. But, at some point, blowing up Russian cities will help to pull back troops from Ukraine to protect Russian cities. It would also help bring Putin to his knees if the Russian military and the citizens of Russia turned on Putin for his aggression in Ukraine.
Nobody is talking about this scenario, and I wonder at what point Ukraine decides to take the fight to Russia?
Beetwasher.
(3,174 posts)Says you. It's not looking that way from where I'm sitting.
ShazzieB
(22,178 posts)It's not looking that way at all from where I sit.
And even if it did, the idea of Ukrainians taking the fight to the "Russian homeland" seems like a waste of resources to me.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)However, if they get some long-range missiles, I can imagine Ukraine hitting Russian bases and supply lines inside Russia.
Swede
(38,245 posts)nt
Bev54
(13,161 posts)There is no certainty to Russia winning this war, at all.
CanonRay
(15,922 posts)is to get Ukraine to surrender.
Dawson Leery
(19,512 posts)Ukraine needs to run their own covert stealth forces to deal with Russkieland.
Scrivener7
(58,170 posts)relayerbob
(7,356 posts)They have already struck at least one airbase within Russia.
left-of-center2012
(34,195 posts)Bongo Prophet
(2,738 posts)
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Spelling matters.
uponit7771
(93,469 posts)... state sponsored mechanized terrorism now shooting at women, children and buildings.
They're not engaging UA regulars ... they can't
And with the new weapons coming in from NATO they're outlier towns they "hold" hostage are up shits creek
Samrob
(4,298 posts)And, are there any hidden resistance cells already inside Russia?
Gore1FL
(22,820 posts)I don't think Ukraine will the sponsor of the terror, but there are people with nothing to lose, but anger and a need to avenge.
Honestly, what I just wrote scares me for a lot of reasons.
NeoGreen
(4,036 posts)...outside their border, should be to silence the artillery stationed in Belarus or Russia, or disrupt columns of troops/armor preparing to advance or resupply into Ukraine. Hopefully from anti-artillery in Ukraine, or if necessay, by air strikes.
Sending troops into other countries would be a mistake.
However, if Putin furter escalates the war above current levels, a reassessment should be conducted.
Irish_Dem
(79,490 posts)For the time being, yes.
If conditions on the ground change, then time to re-think strategies.
Edit to add: I don't think UKR can afford to open up new fronts in Russia. It has its hands full as it is.
captain queeg
(11,780 posts)Its something I mentioned right from the beginning. I dont think Ukrainians will do any cross-border attacks while they are still doing relatively well. Theyre taking the high road morally and have most of the worlds support. If they are defeated and a Russian puppet government installed, then the guerrilla war will take off. Theyll hit targets in Russia or those countries siding with Russia. I think Ukraine and its govt could lose but its not going to be much of a win for the Russians.
dalton99a
(91,897 posts)Unfortunately they don't have such capability
msfiddlestix
(8,162 posts)and lose all the international support it has gained. It muddies the waters, paints a picture of a conflict between two bad actors.
maxsolomon
(38,108 posts)Guerilla: a member of a small independent group taking part in irregular fighting, typically against larger regular forces.
From the Spanish Guero, War.
obamanut2012
(29,150 posts)They don't have enough of anything: troops, vehicles, missiles, sundry materiel.
Good effort, though!!!!
JHB
(37,915 posts)...unless you're talking about raids or strikes to wreck rail lines and bridges the Russians use to bring in supplies etc.
Ukraine is in no position to launch an offensive into Russia.
EX500rider
(12,136 posts)...guarding stuff.
Phoenix61
(18,694 posts)Those would be the most practical to get rid of and I dont think the rest of the world would think twice about it.
NNadir
(37,236 posts)They fought alone until June 22 1941, but survived via aid and attrition.
I think the prediction is garbage.
Bernardo de La Paz
(60,320 posts)"Nobody is talking about this"
... not even the OP.
Bucky
(55,334 posts)The rumors about Russia intelligence and being behind the allegedly Chechen terrorist bombings in the 2000s aren't entirely incredible