Wed Mar 30, 2022, 08:08 AM

If we use the Watergate investigation as a guide.

The people around Trump should be very, very worried. People like Meadows, Navarro, Rudy, etc. There is a very good chance many of them will eventually be indicted. That's what happened to the people around Nixon.

The toughest decision for Garland will be about Trump. Does he indict a former president? Does he name him as an Un-indicted Co-conspirator? Does he do nothing?

7 replies, 654 views

Thread info Bookmark this thread Trash this thread

Reply to this thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

7 replies	Author	Time	Post
If we use the Watergate investigation as a guide. (Original post)	fightforfreedom	Mar 2022	OP
No comparison,	gab13by13	Mar 2022	#1
+1	Emile	Mar 2022	#2
You can't use Watergate as a guide. There is plenty of open evidence of Trumps crimes and his crew.	Autumn	Mar 2022	#3
I agree. "one can't indict a President" "I could shoot a man of Fifth Ave and no one would care."	panader0	Mar 2022	#4
The fact that there is not a Grand Jury at this time is outrageous. This establishes that there	Autumn	Mar 2022	#5
i got a question, who put in the tape recorder and the bugs @ the white house ??	AllaN01Bear	Mar 2022	#6
Watergate ? The bugs were not in the Whitehouse and the tapes were from a system	CentralMass	Mar 2022	#7

Response to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Wed Mar 30, 2022, 08:16 AM

gab13by13 (14,615 posts)

1. No comparison,

Watergate empaneled a grand jury, something that Nick Ackerman, Watergate prosecutor, stated just last night, that DOJ should be doing right now. Ackerman said that a grand jury would cut through all of the red tape and tremendously speed up this investigation.

Reply to this post

Response to gab13by13 (Reply #1)

Wed Mar 30, 2022, 08:19 AM

Emile (10,247 posts)

2. +1

Reply to this post

Response to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Wed Mar 30, 2022, 08:19 AM

Autumn (42,284 posts)

3. You can't use Watergate as a guide. There is plenty of open evidence of Trumps crimes and his crew.

There were some decent Republican back then, there are none, zero now. It seems to me that it has been decided but not announced that one can't indict a President. Former or sitting. Just my opinion.

Reply to this post

Response to Autumn (Reply #3)

Wed Mar 30, 2022, 08:29 AM

panader0 (25,312 posts)

4. I agree. "one can't indict a President" "I could shoot a man of Fifth Ave and no one would care."

It's outrageous. Just like Barr's theory that the POTUS is above committing a crime.
Please DOJ, follow up on the J-6 committee's evidence and bring us justice. And
as far ahead of the mid-terms as possible.

Reply to this post

Response to panader0 (Reply #4)

Wed Mar 30, 2022, 08:38 AM

Autumn (42,284 posts)