Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Report1212

(661 posts)
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 02:07 PM Oct 2012

In June, Republicans Voted Down A Democratic Amendment To Increase Flood Control Funding

I'm hoping that voters in the effected states take note of this

--
The people of the northeast coast of the United States are facing down one of the worst storms in years, as Hurricane Sandy barrels towards New York City. This serves as a stark reminder of the importance of having a government that has the capacity to decently take care of its people.

In order for the government to have that capacity, it needs funding. Last June, House Democrats proposed an amendment to increase funding for the government’s ability to respond to mass flooding, with a $31.6 million appropriation for “flood control and coastal emergencies so we can train and plan for natural disasters, respond to hurricanes, fight floods, and repair storm damage reduction projects.”

Republicans overwhelmingly voted down the amendment in a 233-185 vote. Only two Republicans supported the measure — Rep. Steve King (IA) and Rep. Tom Latham (IA).

Read more: http://boldprogressives.org/flashback-only-two-republicans-supported-a-democratic-amendment-to-increase-flood-control-funds/

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In June, Republicans Voted Down A Democratic Amendment To Increase Flood Control Funding (Original Post) Report1212 Oct 2012 OP
Makes perfect sense...bad weather only happens BlueToTheBone Oct 2012 #1
King and Latham of IA! progressoid Oct 2012 #2
Yes...and...since there is such a huge mass of affected states/people, I think it highly unlikely libdem4life Oct 2012 #3
It's the advance team..they want to get rid of all federal help for disasters. Kurovski Oct 2012 #4

progressoid

(49,990 posts)
2. King and Latham of IA!
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 02:33 PM
Oct 2012

They only supported it because their districts had just been through massive flooding. Otherwise they would have voted with the rest of the herd.

 

libdem4life

(13,877 posts)
3. Yes...and...since there is such a huge mass of affected states/people, I think it highly unlikely
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 02:36 PM
Oct 2012

there are many families in the US who are not somehow affected by this. My niece and great-niece live in DC Metro and even though my weather is sunny, it affects me greatly.

Somehow it will dawn on some ...hopefully many...who had their proverbial backs...and who are johnny-come-latelys flipflopping around with their lives.

Kurovski

(34,655 posts)
4. It's the advance team..they want to get rid of all federal help for disasters.
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 03:17 PM
Oct 2012

Romney said it out loud.

it's not like the Republicans aren't letting us know what the future will be bringing under their leadership.

We've been told.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In June, Republicans Vote...