Kimberly Guilfoyle spends more than 9 hours with House Jan. 6 committee

[Jilly_in_VA]

Kimberly Guilfoyle, the fiancée of Donald Trump Jr., on Monday met for more than nine hours with the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

An earlier attempt at a voluntary closed-door interview with her was derailed over a dispute about who was in the room.

The committee issued Guilfoyle a subpoena last month for information relating to last year’s attack on the U.S. Capitol. The demand detailed how Guilfoyle, a former Fox News personality who then worked for President Donald Trump's re-election campaign, was at the White House that day and spoke at the rally that preceded the riot.

The panel’s chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson, D-Miss., said in a statement at the time that the committee was seeking information from Guilfoyle on Jan. 6-related matters, noting that she also "apparently played a key role organizing and raising funds" for the mid-day rally.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/kimberly-guilfoyle-meeting-house-jan-6-committee-rcna24884
__________________________________________________________________________________
What in the name of every god in the pantheon could they find to question Madam Screech about for 9 hours???????

[smb]

1. Nine Hours? I Hope Nobody Suffered Permanent Hearing Loss! nt

[lame54]

27. That's her strategy...

So, when she screams "Trump is guilty"
The committee replies "What?"

[Jm7603]

2. The thought of 9 hours with Guilfoyle makes me

glad I'm just a private citizen.

[lagomorph777]

20. 9 hours with Gargoyle - our committee members must have strong stomachs.

[jcgoldie]

3. THE BEST IS YET TO COME!@#$%&*()

Or maybe not for her.

[H2O Man]

5. !!!!!!!!!

Well done!

[H2O Man]

4. Recommended.

I hope the Committee members get paid time & a half for those hours. I can't stand the site of her, and have the urge to puke when I hear her voice.

[JHB]

6. What could they find to question her about? Everything she witnessed.

She was on hand when lots of criminal actions were going on.

[LetMyPeopleVote]

7. This will be fun to watch

[global1]

8. I Hope They Are Checking Her Answers Against Don Jr....

Do they conduct all these interviews under oath?

[Captain Zero]

10. This is it. Cross checking answers. Next up. Perjury.

Perjury charges coming for someone.

[kentuck]

11. Perhaps Don Jr will be next?

He will take the 5th.

There is absolute no reason on earth that they should not call Donald J Trump to answer some questions?

[global1]

16. I Thought They Interviewed Jr. Already...nt

[kentuck]

21. I don't recall that?

[C_U_L8R]

9. I got an earache just from the headline.

[bucolic_frolic]

12. Who talked to who on whose burner phone at what times

This is how you laser write the culprits.

I think it could result in a lot of ambiguous confusion on who said what, when, to who.

[Emile]

13. Was she under oath?

[Mr.Bill]

14. It wouldn't make any difference.

These people think nothing of lying, oath or not.

Ask yourself how many people are in prison for lying to Congress.

[H2O Man]

24. It makes no difference

if one lies while under oath or not. Section 1001 of title 18 covers lying to Congress equally in both cases.

[keithbvadu2]

15. That's a lot of lap dancing.

[Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin]

19. You had to go there

[Jilly_in_VA]

17. I have never been able to understand

what Gavin Newsom saw in her. That has always diminished him somewhat in my mind.

[H2O Man]

25. +1

[Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin]

18. Hope she behaved herself

[KWR65]

22. Will the video and/or transcripts of the Jan 6th committee ever be released?

[Kingofalldems]

23. Was this her big entrance?:

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YKUdEww7WlE

[hamsterjill]

26. It's not the nine hours of questioning.

It’s the nine hours of lying that is probably the reason the meeting ran long.