Valid reasons for defending MTG

[Diablo del sol]

There are none, if you feel the need to, stop, think, move away from your keyboard.

Does not mean that hyperbole, over the top criticism might be directed at her.

What it does mean, she does not deserve any protection from any Democrat, EVER.

[onecaliberal]

1. NONE!

[PXR-5]

2. Bless her heart, she has dementia...

[mobeau69]

10. LOL 🥸

[TexasTowelie]

3. Here I was, wondering if I was going to alert this thread for posting right-wing talking points,

but I was pleasantly surprised and appreciate the humor. Welcome to DU!

[MyOwnPeace]

9. Thanks, Texas!!!

I was so 'in shock' with the lack of 'something' there - and then I was convinced it was another 'computer' problem on my part - but you cleared it all up for me - and YES, that IS what needs to be said regarding EmpTy Green - a VACENT NOTHING!!!!!!

And yes, Diablo - WELCOME!!!!!!

[Kaleva]

4. All she needs or cares about is support from her constituents

[True Dough]

5. From her

Q-stituents!

[Kaleva]

6. LOL 😆

[Salviati]

7. The same is true for all but maybe 3 republicans.

Only those willing to take a public stance against authoritarianism, gangsterism, and fascism deserve any consideration, and back it up with action. Anyone unwilling to do so is either complicit or compliant.

[agingdem]

8. Traitor Gangrene defines "vile"

morally despicable/abhorrent/obnoxious/contemptible/evil/vicious/cruel/crude..of no value...that this creature (garbage in human form) is a member of Congress lays squarely on the backs of her constituents...she is their reflection...ignorant, racist, antisemitic, xenophobic..and she is not alone in her world of loathing...Boebert/Cawthorn/Gosar/Gaetz/Jordan/Gohmert/Roy (and the GOP as a whole)...all deserve nothing less than expulsion and to be forgotten..not even a footnote

[Gaugamela]

11. Out of principle I would defend her constitutional rights. I would defend her

person if someone were attacking her with say a flagpole or a fire extinguisher. Not because she would do it for me (she wouldn’t), but because it’s the right thing to do.

[Diablo del sol]

12. No one is attacking her with a flag pole or fire extinguisher

Two items her Jan 6. terrorists used against Capital Police by the way.

The point of my post, she should get zero support here on DU. NONE! People claiming they are taking the high road, thinking they are more intelligent by trying to shut down others.

Not acceptable, no need to jump in and say a damn thing. MTG is under zero physical risk. She has put thousands of people at risk and hundreds have already been hurt.

Let her simmer in the shit stew she created.

And if she was on fire and someone was attacking her with a fire extinguisher, I too would stop that person from attacking her.

[Gaugamela]

13. "Two items her Jan 6. terrorists used against Capital Police by the way." -- That's

exactly why I used those examples. And my point is that I would do what’s right, because I don’t want to be like her. Moreover, I found your post to be pointless hyperbole. Who would defend her viewpoint or opinion on DU? And why does DU need your guidance on this anyway? Why are you presuming to give us mandates? If she says something I agree with, I’ll point it out if I see reason to.

[Meowmee]

14. No support here

She and her fellow seditionists are among the most vile of people and they are responsible for the deaths of many and for great harm and will get no support of any kind from me. They need to be held accountable. But I predict they won’t be.

[LiberalFighter]

15. There are other situations similar that don't have valid reasons.