Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Skidmore

(37,364 posts)
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 06:15 PM Oct 2012

You know what is absent in the coverage of this storm?

Something we heard ad nauseum during the great floods of the Midwest and Katrina was an incessant chorus from early on in the coverage demanding to know why those people live there. This was in spite of the fact that, at least here, there were areas that flooded which had never flooded in recorded history. Nevermind that historically people have tended to settle around water sources for various reasons essential to the survival of the species. We were just noting the absence of this over dinner now and I just wanted to mention it. Perhaps both politicians and media will now realize, since so many of them are now being affected in a large concentration of population, that none of us are truly beyond the reach of natural disaster no matter how much money and effort are thrown at preventing it.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
You know what is absent in the coverage of this storm? (Original Post) Skidmore Oct 2012 OP
Well said. K&R Louisiana1976 Oct 2012 #1
Spot on underpants Oct 2012 #2
right on, skidmore nt JanT Oct 2012 #3
to the media we are all just 'camera fodder' KurtNYC Oct 2012 #4
Best post of the night. n/t sharkman25 Oct 2012 #5
I haven't heard how the 47% are helping the 1% in their time of need... WhaTHellsgoingonhere Oct 2012 #6
Exactly. Terra Alta Oct 2012 #7
Not quite the same, as I recall it. N.O. flooded because the levies were breached... Honeycombe8 Oct 2012 #8
 

WhaTHellsgoingonhere

(5,252 posts)
6. I haven't heard how the 47% are helping the 1% in their time of need...
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 10:46 PM
Oct 2012

...I'd like to hear a few stories about that.

Terra Alta

(5,158 posts)
7. Exactly.
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 10:49 PM
Oct 2012

I never understood the "why do they live there" argument. Any area close to water is prone to flooding. Humans(and humans' ancestors) have settled near bodies of water for hundreds of thousands of years. It's a given that there might be a flood in a particular location.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
8. Not quite the same, as I recall it. N.O. flooded because the levies were breached...
Mon Oct 29, 2012, 10:54 PM
Oct 2012

there were levies because N.O. is actually below sea level and is a flood zone. So there's that.

I also think most of the criticism about living there came after the storm passed through, while the convention center situation was going on. There was a lot of criticism about the way the levies had been built.

Actually, it was Mississippi that got the most damage from Katrina, as Haley Barber will tell people.

I also recalll general discussions among people about people living in various dangerous areas, like all the coastal regions. Not just Louisiana.

(I'm from Louisiana, so I paid particular attention to that event.)

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»You know what is absent i...