I have to say, Romney is beneath contempt. He just isn't credible on ANYTHING.

[bigtree]

In that view, it's perfectly reasonable that I, as a private citizen, expect he should be denied privileges and respect other candidates have been afforded; like giving him benefit of the doubt; agreeing with providing him the benefit of tradition or protocol; assuming that he's a 'decent' or 'honorable' man; or bothering to respect ANYTHING that comes out of his mouth, anything he declares, or anything he does.

I don't believe Romney, at all. I don't think it's out of line to hold, express, and act on that view. I'll leave all the pussyfooting around these republicans to those folks with a vested interest in appearing impartial. That's just not something I think is necessary or productive for private citizens to bother with as they're expecting and demanding more from these elected and nominated politicians.

[speedoo]

1. You expressed that very well.

Of course I agree completely.

[doc03]

2. He is running an ad in Ohio now with the old

debunked claim he gutted the work requirement from welfare.

[lalalu]

3. I sooo agree with you.

[neverforget]

4. He'll say anything to get elected. He has no core beliefs other than in himself.

And he's a wealthy prick who thinks he and Ann are entitled to the White House because of who he is.

[ashling]

5. Given his reputation for warping the truth, obfuscating, and outright lying

What kind of foreign policy could we have if he was president? I doubt seriously if foreign leaders or powers would believe anything he says.

[David Zephyr]

6. Romney is the only man who lies more than Dick Cheney.

Unbelievable.

[MrSlayer]

8. Cheney is a paragon of truth in comparison.

Yeah, it's that bad.

[Rosa Luxemburg]

7. I wish someone would haul him in with a citizen's arrest