Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atticus

(15,124 posts)
Tue May 3, 2022, 07:06 PM May 2022

Alito's draft in the Dobbs case is not a "legal" decision. Some would say it is a "political"

decision, but I think that misses the mark.

Alito puffed up his self-righteous self and authored a RELIGIOUS decision.

He knows, you see, not just what is legal and illegal. More importantly, in his opinion, he knows what is right and what is wrong and--- BY GOD!---abortion is WRONG!

A 49 year old 7-2 bipartisan SCOTUS precedent (Roe) reinforced by a 19 year later re-affirmation (Casey) universally considered "precedent on precedent", can just be flushed when you are doing "the Lord's will", don't you see?

Alito knows the law from A to Z---Arrogance to Zealotry.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Alito's draft in the Dobbs case is not a "legal" decision. Some would say it is a "political" (Original Post) Atticus May 2022 OP
Yup, you nailed it, my dear Atticus! NAILED. n/t CaliforniaPeggy May 2022 #1
TRUTH - right there! n/t MFGsunny May 2022 #2
To date myself, right on right on! KPN May 2022 #3
You are clearly correct. TomSlick May 2022 #4
Correct. The decision uses government to force people to follow Alito's preferred religion bucolic_frolic May 2022 #5
Well, it's not like he's the only religious person on the Court. Mr.Bill May 2022 #6
Correct, but he wrote it. /nt bucolic_frolic May 2022 #7
I'm just worried he wrote it Mr.Bill May 2022 #8
Yup, that is the problem, in a nutshell. bucolic_frolic May 2022 #9
Not just Catholics -- Protestant Evangelicals & Fundamentalists whathehell May 2022 #10

TomSlick

(12,885 posts)
4. You are clearly correct.
Tue May 3, 2022, 07:24 PM
May 2022

This is not a legal opinion. A legal opinion would be based on stare decisis - the foundation of legal reasoning.

This opinion could have easily been written by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith f/k/a The Inquisition. SCOTUS is now firmly controlled by Opus Dei.

bucolic_frolic

(54,142 posts)
5. Correct. The decision uses government to force people to follow Alito's preferred religion
Tue May 3, 2022, 07:27 PM
May 2022

And that is where I would begin to think about it, if ... as if ... I were a lawyer.

Mr.Bill

(24,906 posts)
6. Well, it's not like he's the only religious person on the Court.
Tue May 3, 2022, 07:34 PM
May 2022

Isn't he one of the Catholics who occupy a majority of the seats?

Mr.Bill

(24,906 posts)
8. I'm just worried he wrote it
Tue May 3, 2022, 07:39 PM
May 2022

to appeal to his Catholic friends on the court. They aren't even pretending there is such a thing as separation of church and state anymore. They are there to force their religion on the country.

bucolic_frolic

(54,142 posts)
9. Yup, that is the problem, in a nutshell.
Tue May 3, 2022, 07:46 PM
May 2022

The GOP that warned JFK was a papal agent has installed exactly that.

whathehell

(30,368 posts)
10. Not just Catholics -- Protestant Evangelicals & Fundamentalists
Tue May 3, 2022, 08:11 PM
May 2022

Last edited Thu May 5, 2022, 12:59 AM - Edit history (1)

make up an important part of the anti- choice Republican Party.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Alito's draft in the Dobb...