General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Fringe Christian Nationalists Made Abortion a Central Political Issue
By Katherine Stewart
The most popular origin story of Christian nationalism today, shared by many critics and supporters alike, explains that the movement was born one day in 1973, when the Supreme Court unilaterally shredded Christian morality and made abortion on demand a constitutional right. At that instant, the story goes, the flock of believers arose in protest and threw their support to the party of Life now known as the Republican Party. The implication is that the movement, in its current form, finds its principal motivation in the desire to protect fetuses against the women who would refuse to carry them to term.
This story is worse than myth. It is false as history and incorrect as analysis. Christian nationalism drew its inspiration from a set of concerns that long predated the Supreme Court decision in Roe v. Wade and had little to do with abortion. The movement settled on abortion as its litmus test sometime after that decision for reasons that had more to do with politics than embryos. It then set about changing the religion of many people in the country in order to serve its new political ambitions. From the beginning, the abortion issue has never been just about abortion. It has also been about dividing and uniting to mobilize votes for the sake of amassing political power.
*
On a crisp morning in January 2018, tens of thousands of marchers throng the National Mall in the annual March for Life. The crowd tilts female and young, and the overwhelming majority is white. A good number are clustered in church or campus youth groups and facing down the cold with parkas and Uggs or duck boots to protect their feet from the chill.
More: https://lithub.com/how-fringe-christian-nationalists-made-abortion-a-central-political-issue/
JCMach1
(29,202 posts)and Catholic RWers for 50 yrs
Elessar Zappa
(16,385 posts)It just appears that theyre a large group because they have a loud microphone.
hedda_foil
(16,985 posts)walkingman
(10,865 posts)of why and how the Evangelical movement made Pro-life a major issue. Almost all leaders in the evangelical movement were pro-choice until the late 70's - including Billy Graham and the leader of the SBC (Southern Baptist Convention).
DickKessler
(408 posts)Instead of relying on the courts, the least democratic branch of government.
TlalocW
(15,675 posts)Around supporting segregation when federal monetary support for their non-religious (on paper) institutions, etc. went on the chopping block thanks to - of all people - Richard Nixon (though they tried to blame Jimmy Carter). When they finally gave up on that (on paper), they decided that it was pretty cool that a bunch of right-wing preachers like them had come together and "contributed" to the national dialogue so they picked a new topic - abortion - as their banner issue.
TlalocW
Docreed2003
(18,714 posts)I think this quote captures exactly my experience growing up in evangelical circles in the 80's and what we have seen play out in our politics as evangelicals have risen to prominence.
From the beginning, the New Right sought radical change. They would establish themselves first as the opposition, then the alternative, finally the government, according to Conservative Caucus chair Howard Phillips. We will not try to reform the existing institutions. We only intend to weaken them and eventually destroy them, said Weyrich protégé Eric Heubeck, writing for the Free Congress Foundation. We will maintain a constant barrage of criticism against the Left. We will attack the very legitimacy of the Left. We will not give them a moments rest . . . We will use guerrilla tactics to undermine the legitimacy of the dominant regime.
jalan48
(14,914 posts)Great article. The right wing/Christian takeover has been building for decades.