Protestors should not go to the justice's homes. As we move to the June

[diehardblue]

hearing by the January 6 committee, it will only fuel TFG base and the biased media with more distractions. That's just my opinion.

[Emile]

1. We wouldn't want to infringe on their right to privacy. .

Sarcasm

[HAB911]

3. ++++++++++

[forthemiddle]

6. So are you ok with prolife protesters visiting the liberal judges

This protest is just an invitation to a right to life group publishing the prochoice justices addresses.

Would you have been ok with their side protesting Justice Ginsbergs house when the verdict for Gay marriage came down?

Protests in front of the SCOTUS building is fine, and encouraged. Protests and doxing of Justices homes is not.

Sometimes I really had social media. It has really been the most divisive entity ever invented.

[Emile]

10. Are you okay with the Supreme Court taking a womans

right to privacy away? That's divisive!

[forthemiddle]

12. That is why I said protests at SCOTUS were encouraged!

No good will come of going to someones private home!
Where does that end?
Every time a decision comes out that we disagree with, it's now ok to go to private residences? If that is the new normal I don't want any part of it.
I can not believe we would have been ok if the right invaded Ruth Bader Ginsbergs private home. I just don't believe it!
We are better than this. We aren't changing minds with this stunt.

Lobby your local and state governments to make sure your state stays pro choice.
Join in GOTV projects.
Protest (peacefully) in front of the Supreme Court, or your own State House.

Those are all positive things you can do, but crossing this line (private homes) is one step too far for me, and I will NEVER encourage it.

[Emile]

13. I respect your view, but I don't agree.

These justices have crossed the line of privacy into our private homes, and that is one step too far for me!

[Emile]

18. I have no problem with peaceful protest at their homes and

I am not advocating violence. They should lose their right to privacy, after all that's what they are pushing for women.

[Emile]

21. The right to privacy is not limited to the SC.

I fully support peaceful protest, this is not Russia!

[Emile]

24. Have you ever peacefully protested before

[Emile]

26. LOL

Thinking about that right wing couple in St. Louis outside their home waving guns as peaceful black lives matter protesters marched by their housem

[Emile]

28. Well we now know they will get the SC attention if they do.

That's the whole purpose of protest, to get attention.

[Scrivener7]

14. They are making themselves at home in my uterus. Privacy is off the table.

[Emile]

15. Exactly!

[ChazII]

31. +1

Agree with you completely.

[diehardblue]

30. That's a nasty reply. I am prochoice and can still have an opinion about protesting in front of

their homes. There is no love for the conservative justices and their many decisions. Peace!

[InAbLuEsTaTe]

7. SERIOUSLY! We need to protest every day & night at their homes until they reverse this BS decision!

Just peaceful demonstration, but no peaceful sleep for these disgusting pigs... sorry, but fuck them!! They started this war... we need to fight back, again peacefully, and finish it!!

[Generic Brad]

2. Anything we do will fuel the right wing

They are forever butt hurt perennial victims who constantly look for excuses to express umbrage. I no longer care what they think.

[InAbLuEsTaTe]

9. ☝️ THIS ☝️

[enough]

4. Protesting at their homes will do nothing to change the outcome. NT

[Scrivener7]

11. They leaked this to see if the decision would cause riots. We need the decision

to cause riots. Big ones. Or maybe not riots. I think the Women's March did terrify them because so many millions participated. And it was peaceful as hell. We need to do it again, only bigger.

[Hortensis]

5. :) Absolutely agree. Without lines not to cross, how would anyone

differentiate between mobs?

Our demonstrations are to support our principles and institutions, not to threaten people with personal harm. Only those come to burn them out or hang them high need go there.

[Scrivener7]

8. OK, then set up surveillance equipment so we can watch them from home.

They want a surveillance state? We should give it to them.

I plan to take a trip to DC to join the protests, but I don't live there. It would be nice to be able to annoy them all the time.

[hamsterjill]

17. I doubt many of their homes are accessible by the general public anyway.

I’m sure they are all tucked away safely in gated communities with security on the premises at all times.

[AntivaxHunters]

20. Go to their homes?

We're going to do a lot more than that.
We're not going to allow them to leave their homes. We're not going to allow them ANY peace. We're not going to relent. I don't give a shit about TFG and what they think. And it's time to quit worry about fucking Republicans & time to instead fight like hell in every way possible. Silence is violence. And it's time we take to the streets in protests. the likes of which this country has never seen the likes of before.

It's time to unite regardless of political affiliation. We need EVERY ALLY possible and that means aligning with some folks DU hates. We can not allow for any division because something something Nina Turner. This is an issue we ALL agree on --pro-choice. And the more people have on our side the better.

[LeftInTX]

22. Doxxing a judge, law enforcement, DA is probably "illegal"

Yes, it can be done, via family members, but public records are scrapped (hidden) for law enforcement and judges.

Their info is scrapped mainly due to criminal cases that they handle. The info is also scrapped to prevent bribery etc.

Unlike going to Ted Cruz's home, going to a justice home is crossing a boundary.

Ted Cruz is listed in public records. Judges are not.

Going to their homes will have a negative impact.

[Paladin]

32. Once again, letting obsolete good-conduct rules kneecap our efforts.

If rude public behavior is so Godawful bad, how come trump and his goons have advanced to the point of making a fascist takeover of this country a very real possibility? All that dark, regressive victory, without the benefit of good table manners or any sort of dress code.

I am so fucking sick of Democrats always being polite enough to lose to the forces of evil.