General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsParents face backlash after 6-year-old allowed to run full marathon: 'He was struggling physically'
https://abc7.com/6-year-old-runs-marathon-flying-pig-rainier-crawford-boy/11823149/I am not a doctor or a parent even, but this seems wrong to me. The family are "youtubers" and instagrammers. Some are saying they did this for clicks and views.
...
"He was struggling physically and wanted to take a break and sit every three minutes," Crawford wrote in an Instagram post Tuesday. "After 7 hours, we finally got to mile 20 and only to find an abandoned table and empty boxes. He was crying and we were moving slow so I told him I'd buy him two sleeves [of potato chips] if he kept moving."
...
Organizers of the Flying Pig Marathon defended their decision to let every member of the Crawford family participate in the 2022 marathon.
...
"The intent was to try to offer protection and support if they were on our course (Medical, Fluid and Replenishment)," Iris Simpson Bush, the president and CEO of the marathon's parent organization Pig Works, wrote in an open letter posted to the organization's website.
The nonprofit also told "GMA" they knew the Crawfords would run the Flying Pig race despite the marathon's age limitation, which usually only lets runners 18 and older participate, a factor that played into the decision to let the Crawfords run.
Experts say a child's growth plates, the tissue near long bones, isn't fully developed at age 6 and an extreme activity like running a marathon could be dangerous for children.
PoliticAverse
(26,366 posts)Tree-Hugger
(3,370 posts).....in the coming years we are going to see an intense backlash from kids who were paraded out for youtube/insta/Tik tok content. These parents get so obsessed with click$ and view$$$ that they begin to neglect the well-being of their children. In the YouTube/Instagram/Tik Tok content creator world there aren't any regulations or laws that protect children. There's no Coogan law equivalent for content creators. The family vlog world is often very exploitative.
This poor baby. I can't imagine what a run like that does to a little body.
Dorian Gray
(13,497 posts)It's gross.
JI7
(89,259 posts)I think she was 16 .
hlthe2b
(102,320 posts)The stress of high impact running this distance could readily have resulted in trauma, damage, compression/stress fractures, not to mention ligamentous damage.
This is insane. This is child endangerment, even if they are too ignorant to know.
CincyDem
(6,373 posts)These parents have been running the Pig for years and bringing the kids along as bandit runners. This year, the Pig knew they were going to run the kids and short of arresting them, nothing was going to stop em. So instead, this year the Pig decided to book em in so they would have tracking chips and access to food, hydration, medical tents along the route
thing they would not have a bandits.
So the story that the Pig let this kid run is Mia labeled. The story is that the parents were going run this kid come hell or high water and the Pig doesnt really have the authority or the enforcement vapidity to stop them
so at least let us track the kids.
Also
the parents are nuts. Ive got a lot of friends who run it
some more that 15 years. They say its like any other marathon
youve always got folks, including kids, running the course as bandits without bib numbers.
SoCalDavidS
(9,998 posts)Guess who would have been subject to a lawsuit, had something happened to that kid?
Guess what the parents would have said? "Well, we figured it was o.k., since the marathon allowed him to participate."
Maybe, and I know it's cruel, but maybe, let the parents deal with any consequences, if they chose to violate the rules by letting their kid run, after being denied by the marathon organizers.
ZERO CONSEQUENCES, yet again. The hallmark of America, apparently.
Having not learned ANY lesson, these cretins will be back to break rules again and again, until one day, their luck runs out.
Ms. Toad
(34,080 posts)along the way. The food, hydration, tables were apparently not staffed at mile 20, when the child wanted to stop and dad had to bribe him with buying chips later in order to get him to continue.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Bullshit, child abuse can be prevented, especially when its happening in front of you.
Im a lifelong runner. These people are horrible.
SoCalDavidS
(9,998 posts)Oh well, the nonprofit KNEW the Crawfords would run despite the age requirement, so they just decided to grant them permission to do so.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)+1
TreasonousBastard
(43,049 posts)medical personnel who should be making the decisions?
70sEraVet
(3,505 posts)I always thought that they should get rid of those catagories, and simply have an appropriate age limit to be included in those records. 13 year olds have NO business climbing Mt. Everest!
Maybe have that kind of age limit on these social media companies. And yes, that WOULD be censuring.
Dorian Gray
(13,497 posts)there is something seriously wrong with those parents. That's abusive.
Deuxcents
(16,279 posts)Why not have a marathon for them? Give the kids a place to shine..the adult sphere is not for them. Instead of squawking about it, make some changes for the kids.
LisaL
(44,974 posts)The kid is described as crying and not wanting to go on. And that's by the father. Father had to bribe him by promising him potato to chips to make him continue.
Deuxcents
(16,279 posts)There are kids who may want to .. this way parents have an out. Not with adults but with kids just like them. Maybe this was too intimidating to this little kid..having said that. This particular father needs to be more in touch with his child. Jmo
Phoenix61
(17,008 posts)That doesnt mean they are safe to do. I didnt want to wear a life jacket because I was a good swimmer. My folks didnt care because they understood that a person who believes in Santa Clause, and I did, isnt capable of making rational decisions.
milestogo
(16,829 posts)My vet said not to run with my dog or let him jump till he was a year old - or it could cause harm. Not that he wouldn't do it if given the chance, but that it was her advice that he shouldn't do it.
You'd think a parent would do the same for their child.
BlueTsunami2018
(3,496 posts)Its torture for a child of that age. This is criminal abuse in my opinion.
Kali
(55,016 posts)or do ya'll only know screen addicted couch kids?