General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhite House walks a fine line with intelligence sharing in Ukraine
Two months into Russia's war in Ukraine, the Biden administration has increased the amount of intelligence it shares with Kyiv, contributing to successful strikes against senior Russian leaders and the Russian Navy's flagship, the Moskva, sources familiar with the intelligence sharing tell CNN.
But the effort raises questions about how far the White House is willing to go to help Ukraine fight the Russians while also trying to avoid provoking Moscow and getting drawn into the conflict.
Administration officials insist there are clear limits on the intelligence it shares with Ukraine, including a ban against providing precision targeting intelligence for senior Russian leaders by name, part of a White House effort to avoid crossing a line that Moscow may view as too escalatory.
Yet some current and former officials have suggested that the limits the Biden administration have drawn are arbitrary, in part because the end result is the same -- Ukrainian strikes that kill senior Russian leaders. On top of that, any US assessment of what actions might provoke Moscow depends on the thinking of just one man, Russian President Vladimir Putin.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/white-house-walks-a-fine-line-with-intelligence-sharing-in-ukraine/ar-AAX0pYr
Still Sensible
(2,870 posts)PortTack
(32,785 posts)Wouldnt do the same think again!
dwayneb
(768 posts)"avoid provoking Moscow and getting drawn into the conflict"
Sorry to state the obvious, but NATO is already at war with Russia.
Here's my guess.
Putin will take his time to gain full control of Ukraine before he pushes on into the Baltics - he has about 2 years to get that done.
Why 2 years? Because he understands well that a Putin friendly President is likely to be elected in the USA in 2024. And if the USA doesn't support NATO, he will have the green light to proceed.