In Twitter world, Alex Wagner pointed out this op-ed on FEMA, which should go viral.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/30/opinion/a-big-storm-requires-big-government.html?_r=1&adxnnl=1&ref=opinion&adxnnlx=1351603714-q9aABtAPY/q9KdHVLRvNoAOctober 29, 2012
A Big Storm Requires Big Government
Most Americans have never heard of the National Response Coordination Center, but they’re lucky it exists on days of lethal winds and flood tides. The center is the war room of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, where officials gather to decide where rescuers should go, where drinking water should be shipped, and how to assist hospitals that have to evacuate.
Disaster coordination is one of the most vital functions of “big government,” which is why Mitt Romney wants to eliminate it. At a Republican primary debate last year, Mr. Romney was asked whether emergency management was a function that should be returned to the states. He not only agreed, he went further.
“Absolutely,” he said. “Every time you have an occasion to take something from the federal government and send it back to the states, that’s the right direction. And if you can go even further and send it back to the private sector, that’s even better.” Mr. Romney not only believes that states acting independently can handle the response to a vast East Coast storm better than Washington, but that profit-making companies can do an even better job. He said it was “immoral” for the federal government to do all these things if it means increasing the debt.
snip
Over the last two years, Congressional Republicans have forced a 43 percent reduction in the primary FEMA grants that pay for disaster preparedness. Representatives Paul Ryan, Eric Cantor and other House Republicans have repeatedly tried to refuse FEMA’s budget requests when disasters are more expensive than predicted, or have demanded that other valuable programs be cut to pay for them. The Ryan budget, which Mr. Romney praised as “an excellent piece of work,” would result in severe cutbacks to the agency, as would the Republican-instigated sequester, which would cut disaster relief by 8.2 percent on top of earlier reductions. more
= new reply since forum marked as read
Fugg Rmoney! Keep that monster away from the White House - he would be a bigger disaster than Superstorm Sandy
Not all of the super wealthy are evil. There are many who understand the need for them to pay higher tax rates, to help the less fortunate. Rmoney is a taker and not a giver. He is a bottom feeder who sees profit in disaster. He doesn't consider that most people need help and cannot afford to pay for it, especially when they have just lost everything they have.
In TN., rmoney is ahead. I know many people who believe that "he is a businessman and can turn this country around." Obama's policies have already taken us from the precipice of ruin and aimed us in a direction that will improve our economy over the next few years. Without the 1% reaping most of the money.
Regular Americans will be insured.
Yep, rmoney can ride the improvements that Obama has already set in motion. Repealing Obamacare will allow a lot of the 1%ers to profit from our personal disasters (once again) and then we will be headed in the same downhill direction that bush left us in.
How can anyone not see this?
then this time, make sure they check with people to see if they are republican. If so, tough shit,
and go on to the next door/
this is my first kick
the provision in the grahm ,runion hollingsworth budget reconciliation act (under jimmy carter),that allows for prizatization of federal gvt agencies needs to be repealed. ( i dont know what section of us code that has been coddified into us law)
will never touch any of this .. for obvious reasons that don't need to be repeated.
Not that DU isn't big time. :>
)
