Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,597 posts)
Mon May 16, 2022, 10:38 AM May 2022

In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review ...

In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review certain executive-branch factual findings that determine whether non-citizens are eligible for "adjustment of status." Those findings can dictate whether a person is deported.

Here's the opinion from Amy Coney Barrett in Patel v. Garland: https://supremecourt.gov/opinions/21pdf/20-979_h3ci.pdf.

Neil Gorsuch joins the three liberal justices in dissent.


1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In an immigration case, SCOTUS rules 5-4 that federal courts do NOT have jurisdiction to review ... (Original Post) mahatmakanejeeves May 2022 OP
Gorsuch? Bayard May 2022 #1
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In an immigration case, S...