Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Like this: Charnin Election Model: Obama has 306 expected EV; 97% win probability (Original Post) questionseverything Oct 2012 OP
Who is this person? Logical Oct 2012 #1
Richard Charnin is a mathematician who was banned from DU2 years ago slackmaster Oct 2012 #3
Why was TruthIsAll banned?? BlueCaliDem Oct 2012 #6
He was banned for the way he dealt with a bad case of constipation IIRC slackmaster Oct 2012 #10
??? BlueCaliDem Oct 2012 #15
just one example of an incorrect electronic result questionseverything Oct 2012 #17
Statistician. And his tenacity after many days in the hospital I don't doubt is what kept him alive Ellipsis Oct 2012 #21
I used to read his posts amuse bouche Oct 2012 #8
I recall his posts LondonReign2 Oct 2012 #9
he says the chances of a fair election are not good questionseverything Oct 2012 #11
greg palast has concerns too! questionseverything Oct 2012 #14
Sam Wang just updated... regnaD kciN Oct 2012 #2
Ah, that guy must be thin and effeminate. pointsoflight Oct 2012 #4
+1 lol! flamingdem Oct 2012 #16
Typical Charninesque post-hoc analysis slackmaster Oct 2012 #5
2004 and 2008 Election Models questionseverything Oct 2012 #18
I read a bit of your link RomneyLies Oct 2012 #7
just trying to look at all possibilities questionseverything Oct 2012 #12
srry so slow finding links questionseverything Oct 2012 #13
However there is a 99.9998874% chance tritsofme Oct 2012 #19
so show us the math that refutes this questionseverything Oct 2012 #20
Unfortunately probability is not fact. Ellipsis Oct 2012 #23
That's with a totally clean election. pa28 Oct 2012 #22
yes,he is warning us questionseverything Oct 2012 #24
 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
10. He was banned for the way he dealt with a bad case of constipation IIRC
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 03:39 PM
Oct 2012

He worked it out with a pencil.

Ellipsis

(9,124 posts)
21. Statistician. And his tenacity after many days in the hospital I don't doubt is what kept him alive
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 09:11 PM
Oct 2012

It's all good. He's still around.

Passion does not always equate to fact especially when math is not physical proof but theory, however logical.

In his disbelief that others would take objection to his cyphrin' he became shall we say argumentative to the point of personal attacks... he let words on the "light screen" counter to his opinion get to his ego.


It was a different time

LondonReign2

(5,213 posts)
9. I recall his posts
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 03:33 PM
Oct 2012

Why the heck was he banned?

Anyway, IIRC, TIA was heavily into mathematical models showing how the previous elections were stolen. Does his current forecast assume a fair election? Does it factor in voter suppression and vote-stealing machines?

questionseverything

(9,656 posts)
11. he says the chances of a fair election are not good
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 03:40 PM
Oct 2012

3) In the 1988-2008 presidential elections, 226 of 274 exit polls red-shifted to the Republicans. Only about 137 would normally be expected to red-shift. The probability is zero.
4) 126 of the 274 exit polls exceeded the margin of error. Only 14 (5%) would normally be expected. The probability is ZERO.
5) 123 of the 126 exit polls that exceeded the margin of error red-shifted to the Republicans. The probability is ZERO.

 

slackmaster

(60,567 posts)
5. Typical Charninesque post-hoc analysis
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 03:30 PM
Oct 2012

If Obama wins, he'll say "See, I told you he would win!"

If something else happens, he'll say "See, I told you the election was rigged!"

questionseverything

(9,656 posts)
18. 2004 and 2008 Election Models
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 08:19 PM
Oct 2012

The 2004 model matched the unadjusted exit polls. Kerry had 51.7% and 337 electoral votes. But the election was stolen. Kerry had 48.3% recorded. View the 2004 Electoral and popular vote trend
The 2008 model exactly matched Obama’s 365 EV. The National model exactly matched his official recorded 52.9% share; the State model projected 53.1%. His official margin was 9.5 million votes.
Obama had 58.0% in the unadjusted, weighted state exit poll aggregate (83,000 respondents) which exactly matched the post-election True Vote Model. Obama’s 23 million True Vote margin was too big to steal.

questionseverything

(9,656 posts)
12. just trying to look at all possibilities
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 03:44 PM
Oct 2012

i became interested in vote counting after i watched hacking democracy years ago and more than disturbed when my small mid western town hired an out of state service to report our votes,then that out of state company was bought by a spanish company and it's like wow,how far from control of our elections can we get?

questionseverything

(9,656 posts)
20. so show us the math that refutes this
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 08:58 PM
Oct 2012

3) In the 1988-2008 presidential elections, 226 of 274 exit polls red-shifted to the Republicans. Only about 137 would normally be expected to red-shift. The probability is zero.
4) 126 of the 274 exit polls exceeded the margin of error. Only 14 (5%) would normally be expected. The probability is ZERO.
5) 123 of the 126 exit polls that exceeded the margin of error red-shifted to the Republicans. The probability is ZERO.

pa28

(6,145 posts)
22. That's with a totally clean election.
Tue Oct 30, 2012, 09:14 PM
Oct 2012

He seems to think if you factor in the usual "red shift" between exit polls and actual results it's effectively a tossup.

questionseverything

(9,656 posts)
24. yes,he is warning us
Wed Oct 31, 2012, 03:49 PM
Oct 2012

and if you go to blackboxvoting.org there are several simple things the average person can do to help prevent the "red shift"...things as simple as being at your own precincts poll closing and documenting the numbers the machines report,making sure the number of partcipating voters is high enough to cover the reported votes and then checking your municipalites web site and making sure the results you received at the precinct match what is reported..so the numbers do not spin backwards as they did in monroe ark


http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7875

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Like this: Charnin Electi...