Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

alphafemale

(18,497 posts)
16. I think he proved his integrity when he not only refused the slime mold's bidding
Mon Jun 20, 2022, 07:54 PM
Jun 2022

But went public.

LoisB

(7,223 posts)
5. I don't think he has much choice, we all heard it. He may try to spin it to put TDFG in a better
Mon Jun 20, 2022, 07:40 PM
Jun 2022

light but he can't very well say, "TDFG never asked me to find 11,780 votes".

MontanaMama

(23,337 posts)
7. I think he already gave his statement to the J6C.
Mon Jun 20, 2022, 07:41 PM
Jun 2022

However, do I trust him? No. He’s a repuke. He already said he’d vote for TFG if he ran again.

PJMcK

(22,047 posts)
10. He recorded the phone call from Trump!
Mon Jun 20, 2022, 07:42 PM
Jun 2022

How could he lie?

Raffensperger and his family have been threatened because he stood up for the truth. Even though he's a Republican, he'll be a powerful witness. Remember that the witnesses have been Republicans. This is to preemptively counter the charge that the committee is a partisan attack.

Besides, the committee wouldn't put him on TV if hey had any doubt he'd mess around.

choie

(4,111 posts)
15. he's admitted that he'd vote
Mon Jun 20, 2022, 07:47 PM
Jun 2022

for trump again, so I can imagine him making some kind of excuses for him.

PJMcK

(22,047 posts)
17. Once again, the committee knows exactly how he's going to testify
Mon Jun 20, 2022, 07:55 PM
Jun 2022

Like any smart "prosecution," the committee won't ask questions they don't already know the answers to. Because Raffensperger has already testified, he won't contradict his previous testimony under penalty of perjury. He has a future so he won't mess it up.

Why are you so skeptical when so many Republicans have already testified to Trump's crimes? Barr's testimony was as harsh as it could get yet he said he would still vote for Trump if he were the Republican nominee. Barr told the truth on both accounts but they don't nullify one another.

Anyway, let's see what happens tomorrow. Have a good night, chole.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Can we trust Raffensperge...