General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumscomplain about this all you want. but remember to thank the bernie or busters.
this ALL could have been avoided. but she wasn't liberal enough, right??
leftieNanner
(16,159 posts)But I agree with you.
dsp3000
(685 posts)leftieNanner
(16,159 posts)brush
(61,033 posts)Or voted for the despicable Stein? That election was so close that just a few thousand votes in a handful of states swung it for trump. The margins were razor thin in those states.
History was affected by those poor loser voters.
mopinko
(73,723 posts)Eliot Rosewater
(34,285 posts)while we knew what the result would be
And some of his supporters, NOT ALL...some
leftieNanner
(16,159 posts)AZProgressive
(29,929 posts)haele
(15,393 posts)This isn't a Parliament. Only one of two people could be President, or Senator, or your Representative on the Federal Level, a vote will always be for one or the other.
A "protest vote" always goes to the opposition candidate. So those who wrote in Bernie, Harambe, or voted Green in November 2016 voted for Trump.
And those who couldn't convince themselves to vote for Clinton also voted for Trump, just by leaving the Presidential section of their ballot blank.
Because they assumed their vote wouldn't matter.
In several critical states, Clinton lost by around 10k, less than the number of protest or non-Presidential voters in those states. Too many "Good Democrats" and "Progressives" just took it for granted she would win and indulged in the privilege of expressing their feelings over considering their civic duty.
And that's a really common - and bad - American habit.
Haele
AZProgressive
(29,929 posts)Were disproportionately self-described moderates & conservatives. Sanders likely got votes in 2016 from people who just didnt like Clinton rather than actually supporting Sanders as he got fewer votes in 2020 without Clinton in the race.
The small percentage of non-voters or third party voters are just really loud online.
brush
(61,033 posts)support Hillary in the general.
AZProgressive
(29,929 posts)brush
(61,033 posts)AZProgressive
(29,929 posts)Most of these threads attack the left but the reality is those that didnt vote for Clinton were actually more conservative but you dont see threads bashing moderates for Clintons 2016 loss. Sanders picked up votes from people unlikely to vote for Clinton.
Most of us on the left voted for Clinton & Biden in the general election but they dont get any credit for that.
brush
(61,033 posts)I do remember the Bernie Bros, the Democratic Socialists (a sure vote loser.phrase), the calling of Hillary as a corporate whore, and all the rest that caused some to stay home or go for Stein in the general.
AZProgressive
(29,929 posts)There is hard data that shows "Bernie Bros" are a myth
(Snip)
The only problem? The evidence that Sanders supporters are uniquely cruel online, compared to any other candidates' supporters, is scant; much of the discourse around Bernie Bros seems to rely on skewed anecdotes that don't stand up to scrutiny. Many Sanders supporters suspect that the stereotype is perpetuated in bad faith to help torpedo his candidacy.
(Snip)
A few weeks ago I penned a story for Salon attempting to qualitatively disprove the Bernie Bro myth by pulling from psychological theory and the nature of online behavior. To summarize my conclusions: First, there is a general tendency for online behavior to be negative, known as the online disinhibition effect but it affects all people equally, not merely Sanders' supporters. Second, pundits systematically ignore when other candidates' supporters are mean online, perhaps because of the aforementioned established stereotype; in this sense, the Bernie Bro is not dissimilar from other political canards like the "welfare queen." Third, Twitter is not a representative sample size of the population, and is so prone to harboring propaganda outfits and bots such that it is not a reliable way of gauging public opinion.
Now, to add to this qualitative assessment, there is quantitative evidence, too reaped from studying hundreds of thousands of interactions online that reveals the Bernie Bro myth as, well, a myth. Jeff Winchell, a computational social scientist and graduate student at Harvard University, crunched the numbers on tweet data and found that Sanders' supporters online behave the same as everyone else. Winchell used what is called a sentiment analysis, a technique used both in the digital humanities and in e-commerce, to gauge emotional intent from social media data.
(Snip)
"Bernie followers act pretty much the same on Twitter as any other follower," Winchell says of his results. "There is one key difference that Twitter users and media don't seem to be aware of.... Bernie has a lot more Twitter followers than Twitter followers of other Democrat's campaigns," he added, noting that this may be partly what helps perpetuate the myth.
https://www.salon.com/2020/03/09/there-is-hard-data-that-shows-bernie-bros-are-a-myth/
Basically everyone tends to be an asshole when they are online.
About the Bernie voters that didnt vote for Clinton in the general election.
538
You might be tempted to think that these #NeverHillary voters are leftists who thought Clinton was too much of pro-corporate, warmongering centrist. But relatively few of them were. Less than a fifth of them voted for Stein, for example. Instead, these voters were disproportionately likely to describe themselves as moderate or conservative. Among the 31 percent of self-described conservatives who voted for Sanders in the Democratic primaries, more than half were #NeverHillary voters, for example. A large minority of the independents and Republicans who supported Sanders were #NeverHillary voters as well.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/bernie-sanders-was-helped-by-the-neverhillary-vote-what-does-that-mean-for-his-chances-now/
There are a lot of 2016 Bernie supporters who are right wing now. Tim Pool is an example but there is also Greenwald & others. Joe Rohan is an example of the type of person that supports Bernie in a primary but wont support the Democratic nominee. Those who you describe are very loud.
brush
(61,033 posts)figures who stayed home and who went 3rd party, but we know for sure Hillary won the popular vote and lost the EC by a thin margin. IMO Bernie by extending his campaign, going to see the Pope and all that instead of conceding when it was apparent that he had lost embittered some towards Hillary and contributed to trump squeezing out a razor-thin win.
I'm glad he didn't repeat that in 2020.
AZProgressive
(29,929 posts)Which is a similar percentage of Clinton voters that voted for Obama. I was an Obama boy in 2008 and remember the Pumas. 12% voted for Trump while another 10% voted for either Gary Johnson or Jill Stein. The remaining percentage didnt vote.
In 2020 it was apparent he was going to lose the primary after he lost Michigan. He wouldnt have been able to stay in with Biden outperforming Hillary Clinton.
brush
(61,033 posts)That's a big question as the trump v Clinton vote was much tighter than Obama's relatively easy win over McCain.
Fullduplexxx
(8,626 posts)Voltaire2
(15,377 posts)emulatorloo
(46,155 posts)sop
(18,605 posts)inthewind21
(4,616 posts)Jokers to the right...
aeromanKC
(3,890 posts)Emile
(42,281 posts)dsp3000
(685 posts)oh thats right.
Emile
(42,281 posts)inthewind21
(4,616 posts)to blame someone else.
Eliot Rosewater
(34,285 posts)2 Meow Momma
(6,876 posts)Some reaching into the past to blame left leaning people need to get their shit together and look forward...
AND PUT BLAME WHERE IT BELONGS! Christofascism!
Fullduplexxx
(8,626 posts)2 Meow Momma
(6,876 posts)something catastrophic happens.
Its not helpful to get mad at each other here, unless thats the OPs (and others) objective.
Fullduplexxx
(8,626 posts)Can happen when you fk around with your vote In case bernie and/or jill Stein or anyone else decides to try and split the Dem vote
2 Meow Momma
(6,876 posts)a reminder.
inthewind21
(4,616 posts)trying to erase the past and clean a slate need to get their shit together and realize HOW we got here.
2 Meow Momma
(6,876 posts)go out of their way to divide us here.
Their objective? Who am I to say.
AZProgressive
(29,929 posts)When it comes to Biden my vote contributed to his win as a swing state voter from Arizona.
I doubt it was because they didnt feel she wasnt liberal enough.
538
You might be tempted to think that these #NeverHillary voters are leftists who thought Clinton was too much of pro-corporate, warmongering centrist. But relatively few of them were. Less than a fifth of them voted for Stein, for example. Instead, these voters were disproportionately likely to describe themselves as moderate or conservative. Among the 31 percent of self-described conservatives who voted for Sanders in the Democratic primaries, more than half were #NeverHillary voters, for example. A large minority of the independents and Republicans who supported Sanders were #NeverHillary voters as well.
https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/bernie-sanders-was-helped-by-the-neverhillary-vote-what-does-that-mean-for-his-chances-now/
Also there were over 7 million Obama-Trump voters in 2016. If youre going to have scapegoats at least scape goat the right people.
Dave says
(5,425 posts)Torchlight
(6,820 posts)As long as we all realize that sooner rather than later, it will be time to roll up our sleeves and get more voters out this cycle.
Together the possibility remains. Separate the possibilities evaporate.
egduj
(881 posts)In fact, I don't think I blame Bernie at all... I must be missing something.
Meadowoak
(6,606 posts)RANDYWILDMAN
(3,163 posts)and we should get one or the other. it's 5-4 the other way
Quit blaming Demo voters.
Meadowoak
(6,606 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(23,219 posts)Roe couldve been codified years ago, if not for those who were more worried about getting re-elected than making substantive change.
We.Had.The.Votes.
ProfessorPlum
(11,461 posts)way to try to divide us.
markpkessinger
(8,909 posts)The FACT is that some 87% of Bernie primary voters united behind Hillary in the general election, which is a significantly higher percentage than that of Hillary supporters who united behind Obama in 2008! And of that 3% who didn't, they were never going to vote for Hillary under any circumstances.
Bernie campaigned hard for Hillary during the 2016 general election.
Hillary lost because, despite being very accomplished, she ran an absolutely terrible and out-of-touch campaign. At a time when populist sentiment was running high, and as Trump barnstormed across the country with massive rallies, Hillary opted to remain in her comfort zone, and confined her appearances mostly to small groups of well-heeled donors -- which didn't exactly allay the fears of those who thought she was an out-of-touch elitist.
Hillary had a chance to get out in front of the issue of the speeches to Wall Street banks during the primary, when Bernie challenged her to release those speeches. She opted to stonewall, which left her wide open to the Wikileaks dump that came late in the campaign.
These were unforced errors. So stop spreading this damnable lie that Bernie caused Hillary's loss in 2016! It is needlessly divisive, and doesn't help further anyone's cause!
Maru Kitteh
(31,759 posts)Emile
(42,281 posts)AntivaxHunters
(3,234 posts)librechik
(30,957 posts)yeah. Don't get me going....
G_j
(40,569 posts)wasting time. It's a freaking emergency!!!
AntivaxHunters
(3,234 posts)and should be POTUS. You want something to blame? Blame the stupid Electoral College.
We're the party of DEMOCRACY. The Electoral College is anti-Democratic. It is exactly why Trump won.