General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCould abortions be performed in military base clinics regardless of the state?
Ocelot II
(115,704 posts)mobeau69
(11,144 posts)Phoenix61
(17,006 posts)Might be easier to use them as getting civilians on base can be difficult.
Dysfunctional
(452 posts)Where I live, I have a VA primary care doctor and a psychiatrist, my dermatologist, podiatrist, gastroenterologist, cardiologist, optometrist, audiologist, pulmonologist, psychologist, and neurologist are all non-VA, plus where I go for my MRIs, c-scans, and pet scans all because there aren't any VA within a 30-minute drive. Congress would have to allocate a lot more money to help all the veterans who want to use the VA healthcare system.
unblock
(52,235 posts)As part of the application process, they get a physical and the government says hey, we can't accept you while you're pregnant but we can give you a free abortion if you want.
After the abortion, the woman can choose to continue enrollment process or simply decline and go home.
I'm guessing the could all be done by executive order.
in2herbs
(2,945 posts)get an abortion, since the armed services medical services are akin to Medicare for All, wouldn't your suggestion result in a Medicare for All expansion? If so, I'm all for it!
Raven123
(4,844 posts)mobeau69
(11,144 posts)unblock
(52,235 posts)Wounded Bear
(58,656 posts)which disallows federal funds for abortion.
Phoenix61
(17,006 posts)In 1993, President Clinton modified the military policy on providing abortions at military medical facilities. Under the change directed by the President, military medical facilities were allowed to perform abortions if paid for entirely with non-Department of Defense (DOD) funds (i.e., privately funded).
DetroitLegalBeagle
(1,923 posts)Current law only allows for the military hospitals to perform abortions in the cases of rape, incest, or danger to the life of the mother. The law also bans the use of funds to pay for abortions with exception to cases of rape, incest, or danger to the life of the mother.
10 USC 1093 - Performance of abortions: restrictions
(a)Restriction on Use of Funds.
Funds available to the Department of Defense may not be used to perform abortions except where the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term or in a case in which the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest.
(b)Restriction on Use of Facilities.
No medical treatment facility or other facility of the Department of Defense may be used to perform an abortion except where the life of the mother would be endangered if the fetus were carried to term or in a case in which the pregnancy is the result of an act of rape or incest.
mobeau69
(11,144 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(15,616 posts)mobeau69
(11,144 posts)Hekate
(90,690 posts)
at risk of their own lives?
Fiendish Thingy
(15,616 posts)The conversation can start there.
Hekate
(90,690 posts)Fiendish Thingy
(15,616 posts)Is that so? If so, why?
Hekate
(90,690 posts)QUOTE
#1 What is this "reservations" idea floating around*? Native Americans are supposed to help solve...
. what is, frankly, a white peoples problem?** Out of what abundant resources weve endowed to them? Many such places are in poverty, with clinics barely scraping by and we want them to be the conduit for our medical care? We want them to take in our poor, and shelter them, and with what funds and to take on the murderous fanatics on our behalf?
Frankly, I think this is on us. Its our responsibility. Our society created this clusterfck, and we have to clean it up.
* meaning Ive now seen this idea more than once at DU since the news about Roe broke
** white people meaning the society and the power structure of the US
#2 National Parks are NOT for building clinics that will attract fanatics who are armed and dangerous
With thanks to malaise, let me make this pellucidly clear: I myself am white, a 74 y.o. woman who has supported Planned Parenthood and their good works since I was about 20.
END QUOTE
Fiendish Thingy
(15,616 posts)I think Dept. Of Interior should have a conversation with tribal leaders about allowing privately funded clinics on tribal lands.
I also think Biden should explore the use of federal enclaves in national parks as sites for privately funded clinics.
Any clinic, anywhere, has the potential to attract armed fanatics- that shouldnt be a reason to not use a loophole to protect womens reproductive rights. I would support using the National Guard to protect the clinics if needed- if they can be used to integrate schools, they can be used to protect womens access to healthcare.
I agree there needs to be a better long term solution, optimally by codifying Roe and expanding the court.
Otherwise, We will have to agree to disagree.
JI7
(89,250 posts)Hekate
(90,690 posts)
arson, maiming, and mayhem before this and they wont stop now.
I cant get any answer from this earnest poster as to WHY the people on tribal lands would even WANT to step into this mess and WHY anyone outside the tribes even thinks they are obligated to do so. All the goodwill generated by whites over the last half-millenium, maybe? All the healthcare assistance white people have provided them really?
Seriously,
MichMan
(11,931 posts)Why would that be a good idea?
Fiendish Thingy
(15,616 posts)It discusses the use of federal enclaves, many within national parks, that are exempt from state laws. There are thousands of enclaves, in every state.
Biden could open the enclaves for use by clinics with a simple EO.
Hekate
(90,690 posts)But you knew that
Fiendish Thingy
(15,616 posts)Response to Fiendish Thingy (Reply #21)
WarGamer This message was self-deleted by its author.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)If they wanted to deploy her.
Hekate
(90,690 posts)Just sayin
Response to mobeau69 (Original post)
WarGamer This message was self-deleted by its author.
bluestarone
(16,941 posts)It will be the easiest way. Only problem is FUNDING? I would donate if needed.
Response to bluestarone (Reply #29)
WarGamer This message was self-deleted by its author.