Republicans who scream about not protecting justices

[Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin]

Link to tweet

[RockRaven]

1. The Repuke hysteria about the safety of the Republican Court is preemptive bothsiderism.

They know, based on prior experience, that bloodthirsty psychos on their side will use this ruling as a permission structure to violently attack women, health care providers, and Democrats. They are trying to gin up an illusion of Repuke victimhood as fodder for the predictable corporate media "on one hand, on the other hand" gambit.

[Wounded Bear]

2. Yep! And diverting precious resorces away from those who actually NEED protection...

[The Magistrate]

3. Citizens Are Free To Exercise 1st and 2nd Amendment Rights, Sir

I cannot think of a single lawful reason for police to interfere with an armed crowd gathered outside the home of any judge, especially since it seems fine for state and local election officials. I suppose if their petition for redress of grievances got too loud, or blocked traffic, but there does not seem to be another reason for police to interfere, under the Constitution as interpreted by the court.

[keithbvadu2]

4. Moscow Mitch; Are children's lives less important than those judges?

If the answer is yes, just say so.