General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI wonder if the secrecy about tomorrow's hearing is witness security related
Protecting the witness. Might be a bit of an OTT theory, but if they don't announce a name, or names, that's what I'm thinking.
elleng
(130,917 posts)Brainfodder
(6,423 posts)Especially if he was confessing due to very very very very very very ill health and implicating the 1000+ people each by name?
I still got big dreams...
emulatorloo
(44,127 posts)RoeVWade
(200 posts)...not that I think that would be it, but it would be quite startling.
bucolic_frolic
(43,169 posts)I have no idea.
Kingofalldems
(38,458 posts)High security needed for this witness.
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)Siwsan
(26,263 posts)My gut says it's something to do with the new documentary.
RoeVWade
(200 posts)vvv
usonian
(9,809 posts)I am signing off cuz chores ain't getting done.
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216857054
Franken looking forward to tomorrow's
Newly announced hearing
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100216857389
My *hunch* regarding tomorrow's Jan 6 Committee hearing.
MLAA
(17,294 posts)Under The Radar
(3,404 posts)I am wondering what he will pull out of his bag for a diversion to this news.
Totally Tunsie
(10,885 posts)Siwsan
(26,263 posts)Maybe add in watering eyes and drool.
H2O Man
(73,552 posts)Wow! I hadn't thought of that! But it does make sense. Thank you!
OneGrassRoot
(22,920 posts)but an article I read said specifically that they aren't naming the witness out of concern for their safety.
Thank you. Makes sense.
Mr.Bill
(24,294 posts)safety, but more like not wanting anyone to get to the witness first and influence, threaten or blackmail them.