Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(108,304 posts)
Fri Jul 1, 2022, 09:10 PM Jul 2022

Abortion drug maker says Mississippi can't ban pill despite Supreme Court ruling

By Brendan Pierson

(Reuters) -The maker of a drug used in medication abortions has told a federal judge that the U.S. Supreme Court's recent ruling eliminating the nationwide right to abortion does not allow Mississippi to stop it from selling the pills in the state.

GenBioPro Inc, which makes a generic version of the drug mifepristone, said in a Thursday filing in Jackson, Mississippi federal court that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's approval of the drug should override any state ban.

The Las Vegas-based company sued the state in 2020 to challenge regulations that restricted medication abortion specifically. Mississippi is now set to ban nearly all abortions under a 2007 "trigger law" following the Supreme Court's ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health, which overturned its landmark 1973 ruling in Roe v. Wade establishing a constitutional right to abortion.

GenBioPro said that law will create a "that-much more direct and glaring conflict" with the FDA. It cited U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland's statement last week that states "may not ban mifepristone based on disagreement with the FDA's expert judgment about its safety and efficacy."

https://www.yahoo.com/news/abortion-drug-maker-says-mississippi-171739551.html

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Abortion drug maker says Mississippi can't ban pill despite Supreme Court ruling (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jul 2022 OP
K&R for visibility. crickets Jul 2022 #1
here we go ! juudge's not qualified for medical decisions ------ cloudboy07 Jul 2022 #2
Back to the Supreme Court. progressoid Jul 2022 #3
But per the ruling against EPA policies earlier this week, Clarence Thomas iluvtennis Jul 2022 #4
Well Congress didn't specifically approve THAT drug... WestMichRad Jul 2022 #5
 

cloudboy07

(351 posts)
2. here we go ! juudge's not qualified for medical decisions ------
Fri Jul 1, 2022, 11:31 PM
Jul 2022

there boundary's of the FDA ! they talk about quack doctor's , how about quack judge's? just a thought?

iluvtennis

(19,882 posts)
4. But per the ruling against EPA policies earlier this week, Clarence Thomas
Fri Jul 1, 2022, 11:58 PM
Jul 2022

and his supremes don’t think federal agencies have any right to impose their policies on the US society, only congress can do that. I could see Clarence Thomas and his supremes ruling that FDA has no respect cut to approve drugs.

I know my opinion sounds asinine, but that what I gathered from this weeks ruling against the EPA.

WestMichRad

(1,340 posts)
5. Well Congress didn't specifically approve THAT drug...
Sat Jul 2, 2022, 12:11 AM
Jul 2022

…so FDA doesn’t have authority to tell the state it is approved there, right?

/sarcasm

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Abortion drug maker says ...