Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alittlelark

(18,890 posts)
Sat Jul 2, 2022, 02:45 PM Jul 2022

What if a 53 year old woman needs an abortion?

After the age of 35 pregnancy comes with high risks. The eggs that we carry have been with us since we were in OUR mothers wombs.

The chance of birth defects is exponential. The risks to the health of the mother are also greatly heightened.

Some women spend tens of thousands of dollars to conceive a child after 35. That is their choice. If they can afford the expenditure I assume they can also have good medical insurance. They have access to the best doctors their $ will buy.

Other women, not in the top 3%, are gonna have problems.

NO SANE COUNTRY would want a woman past 50 years old to give birth (if she and/or the child survives it) because the odds of that child being 'normal' are not great. There would likely be 'needs'.

This country does not appreciate or support 'needs'.

Women in their 50's likely think that a missed period is menopause kicking in. I did. After 3 missed periods u see your Gyn to deal with menopause. You get a different diagnosis.

I made a choice. I believe it was in the best interest of myself and the 'life' of the child.

I would not want to be at my child's HS graduation ceremony at 70 years old

I have NO SHAME.


27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
What if a 53 year old woman needs an abortion? (Original Post) alittlelark Jul 2022 OP
You are courageous momta Jul 2022 #1
Mother Nature can be a trickster that way, & you are absolutely right: it's dangerous... Hekate Jul 2022 #2
You are right- viva la Jul 2022 #3
I support your choice. Brainfodder Jul 2022 #4
CHOICE was what I had alittlelark Jul 2022 #5
Me too. n/t iluvtennis Jul 2022 #22
As many here have said. . . NQAS Jul 2022 #6
All unwanted babies should be delivered to Amy Coney Barrett's home. milestogo Jul 2022 #7
She'll just chuck them in the recycling. "Already Born" is not something she cares about. erronis Jul 2022 #13
Great concept except would you want her raising more children? plimsoll Jul 2022 #14
Kinda like those Dugars leftieNanner Jul 2022 #15
That was my first thought when I saw that viral photo plimsoll Jul 2022 #18
I'm pretty sure the ones she has were all raised by nannies. milestogo Jul 2022 #19
And she has lots more money now MyMission Jul 2022 #24
I don't think any of these states have exceptions for the age of the mother. LisaL Jul 2022 #8
Funny That.......................... alittlelark Jul 2022 #9
One thing I learned after 2 geriatric pregnancies...it's as dangerous for that 12 yo. Native Jul 2022 #10
I had two of those too leftieNanner Jul 2022 #16
I had 2, both healthy, elleng Jul 2022 #27
I saw a FB post the other day; "She can just go to a State that allows it" oldsoftie Jul 2022 #11
Oh sure! leftieNanner Jul 2022 #17
I'm pretty sure the official Republican position is "Tough shit, sister" Bucky Jul 2022 #12
I'm not sure Iany Republican would be respectful enough to say "sister," though. soldierant Jul 2022 #25
If a 50+ year old woman needs an abortion, she'll be in the same spot as the 10-year little girl peggysue2 Jul 2022 #20
The key here is sane country paleotn Jul 2022 #21
Serious birth defects really should be on the short list with rape/incest/health of the mother. Shermann Jul 2022 #23
The laws are written by men drmeow Jul 2022 #26

momta

(4,079 posts)
1. You are courageous
Sat Jul 2, 2022, 02:56 PM
Jul 2022

What a difficult thing to have to experience, but thank you for sharing your story.

And you're absolutely right. This country does NOT appreciate or support 'needs'.

Hekate

(90,674 posts)
2. Mother Nature can be a trickster that way, & you are absolutely right: it's dangerous...
Sat Jul 2, 2022, 02:56 PM
Jul 2022

As with the very young, the girls 14 and way under, it’s a high risk pregnancy in every sense. I am glad you were able to get the care you needed.

viva la

(3,292 posts)
3. You are right-
Sat Jul 2, 2022, 02:58 PM
Jul 2022

This is another circumstance -- like all of them-- where only the woman can decide what the best choice is.

At 25, I had a dangerous delivery that messed up my body in several ways (2 permanently). And I was young and healthy and had no pre-existing condition.

I don't think there are too many women in their 50s who would come out of a pregnancy and delivery without some damage-- blood pressure, kidney problems, blood clots come to mind.

NQAS

(10,749 posts)
6. As many here have said. . .
Sat Jul 2, 2022, 03:08 PM
Jul 2022

and as Hillary said last week, women will die.

I'll add to that: Girls will die. Babies will die. Suicides will rise. We may see these developments right away, or they may take several years of mayhem before these assertions can be verified.

The only way to stop the Supreme Court from legislating from the bench is to expand the Court. Notwithstanding the 60% + of Americans who are opposed to the blow dealt to Roe, and notwithstanding the 60%+ of Americans who believe Trump should be indicted, I have little doubt that RW voters will vote D. So, unless some share of "mainstream" republican vote D, voting will not change a thing.

Remember, Republicans have had this in mind for 50 years. Thomas has said he is out for revenge, and has been since he became a supreme court justice. Fox has been at this for more than 2 decades, hate radio for far longer. We have less than 2 more years to implement some sort of pushback. And while Liz Cheney is to be commended for her role on the J6 committee - as they say, books will be written - let's not forget that she and other never trump Republicans believe trump was doing a fine job until he "went off the rails."

erronis

(15,241 posts)
13. She'll just chuck them in the recycling. "Already Born" is not something she cares about.
Sat Jul 2, 2022, 04:16 PM
Jul 2022

Now, perhaps if she set up a small charity (non-religious) of say $100,000,000,000 (100 billion USD) to help take care of babies through infancy, childhood, school, college, and a good chance at a job - perhaps I'd have some respect for her and her ilk.

Not expecting to get any help from her FedSoc, CNP, Opus Dei, libertarian folks.

plimsoll

(1,668 posts)
14. Great concept except would you want her raising more children?
Sat Jul 2, 2022, 04:18 PM
Jul 2022

Sure nature vs. nurture and all, but to be honest she gives me the creeps. She just oozes Stepford wife.

plimsoll

(1,668 posts)
18. That was my first thought when I saw that viral photo
Sat Jul 2, 2022, 04:27 PM
Jul 2022

Of the smiling people with the sign "We'll adopt your baby."

Hey, is that Josh Dugar?

MyMission

(1,850 posts)
24. And she has lots more money now
Sat Jul 2, 2022, 05:22 PM
Jul 2022

So she can hire more nannies. But I agree, wouldn't consider her an acceptable adoptive parent, even though she has adopted a few. I don't consider her an acceptable human being either.
I've seen the term Stepford wife used to describe her more than once.

alittlelark

(18,890 posts)
9. Funny That..........................
Sat Jul 2, 2022, 03:16 PM
Jul 2022

They ONLY care about CONTROL - older forced chilbirth mothers have a good chance of dying and that works for them.

Native

(5,942 posts)
10. One thing I learned after 2 geriatric pregnancies...it's as dangerous for that 12 yo.
Sat Jul 2, 2022, 03:57 PM
Jul 2022

Think of an upside down bell curve.

elleng

(130,895 posts)
27. I had 2, both healthy,
Sun Jul 3, 2022, 02:47 PM
Jul 2022

first born ON her due date, next born 1 week before her due date.

I now have 4 healthy grandkids, the youngest had 3 year old birthday yesterday.

oldsoftie

(12,533 posts)
11. I saw a FB post the other day; "She can just go to a State that allows it"
Sat Jul 2, 2022, 04:01 PM
Jul 2022

Like THAT doesnt cost a bunch of money.

leftieNanner

(15,084 posts)
17. Oh sure!
Sat Jul 2, 2022, 04:26 PM
Jul 2022

She can take off work for three days, put her other children - somewhere, drive or fly to another state for the procedure.

Easy peasy.

Women with money can always get abortion care. Poor women cannot.

Your point is a good one.

Bucky

(54,003 posts)
12. I'm pretty sure the official Republican position is "Tough shit, sister"
Sat Jul 2, 2022, 04:09 PM
Jul 2022

We're probably still a couple of election cycles away from them starting to throw in gratuitous citations of God punishing Eve with menstrual cycles.

soldierant

(6,857 posts)
25. I'm not sure Iany Republican would be respectful enough to say "sister," though.
Sat Jul 2, 2022, 05:46 PM
Jul 2022

I'm thinking "slut."

peggysue2

(10,828 posts)
20. If a 50+ year old woman needs an abortion, she'll be in the same spot as the 10-year little girl
Sat Jul 2, 2022, 04:42 PM
Jul 2022

Shit out of luck.

The middle-aged+ woman will suffer the same fate as the little girl:

Forced to carry the pregnancy to term.

This is The House Religious Zealots are building. For everyone.

Shermann

(7,413 posts)
23. Serious birth defects really should be on the short list with rape/incest/health of the mother.
Sat Jul 2, 2022, 05:11 PM
Jul 2022

It's odd to me that it is often omitted from the conversation on the MSM. There is a perception that there's some sort of slippery slope risk with that.

drmeow

(5,017 posts)
26. The laws are written by men
Sat Jul 2, 2022, 05:46 PM
Jul 2022

They have kids when they are in their 50's all the time! I know one who just did.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What if a 53 year old wom...