Unimaginable abortion stories will become more common. Is American journalism ready?

[Nevilledog]

Link to tweet

Tweet text:

Nick Riccardi
@NickRiccardi
·
Follow
Good ⁦@laurahazardowen⁩ piece on the 10-yr-old’s abortion story. We are going to have to get used to “thinly sourced” stories like this because so much of this stuff is, by law if not inclination, is private.

niemanlab.org
Unimaginable abortion stories will become more common. Is American journalism ready?
In America after the end of Roe v. Wade, one brave source, on the record, is often the best we are going to get. Countless other stories will never be told.
1:49 PM · Jul 13, 2022

https://www.niemanlab.org/2022/07/unimaginable-abortion-stories-will-become-more-common-is-american-journalism-ready/

As more states restrict or ban abortion, more women and girls who are raped will face a choice between crossing state lines for care or delivering babies when they are still in elementary school. I too wish that this were untrue! But events this week show that even if you can’t bear to believe it — even if it seems so impossible that it must receive a heartily skeptical fact-checking treatment — it is going to happen.

And reporters who want to tell these stories — and the news organizations they work for — may have to abandon some conventional journalism wisdom in order to give the stories the attention they deserve.

Last week, weeks after the Supreme Court voted to strike down Roe v. Wade, President Joe Biden signed an executive order in an attempt to protect abortion access. In remarks at the time, Biden said, “Just last week, it was reported that a 10-year-old girl was a rape victim —10 years old — and she was forced to have to travel out of state to Indiana to seek to terminate the pregnancy and maybe save her life.” The story he was citing was published by the Indianapolis Star on July 1.

From that story:

On Monday three days after the Supreme Court issued its groundbreaking decision to overturn Roe v. Wade, Dr. Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist, took a call from a colleague, a child abuse doctor in Ohio.

Hours after the Supreme Court action, the Buckeye state had outlawed any abortion after six weeks. Now this doctor had a 10-year-old patient in the office who was six weeks and three days pregnant.

Could Bernard help?

The two-byline story — written by Shari Rudavsky and Rachel Fradette — made headlines around the world. But the first impulse of mainly right-leaning news organizations — despite the fact that the doctor who performed the abortion was on the record saying this happened — was to try to debunk it. Why? I mean, probably because it’s horrible and we don’t want to believe a 10-year-old could get raped and pregnant, because 10-year-olds are babies themselves. (By the way, Covid appears to have increased early-onset puberty around the world. Getting your period “early” now means you get it when you’re younger than 8.)

*snip*

[relayerbob]

1. The country ignores 30k+ gun deathe a year

The nytbags cheer for it. So, not only will the media tire of it quickly, but the forced-birth crowd will be cheering with every new atrocity

[Irish_Dem]

2. The GOP will probably make it against the law to report stories about abortion issues.

Send people to jail and pay fines for those speaking or writing about such events.

[RKP5637]

3. What a fucken stressful country! n/t

[Midnight Writer]

4. Saw earlier that Ohio had recorded 54 abortions in under-14 year-olds in 2020

In 1998, that number was over 300.

These abortions (which probably don't account for nearly all of them; I'm assuming Plan B is responsible for the fall in numbers) are illegal under Ohio law.

What kind of people support forcing little kids to give birth, on top of what they are already dealing with?

I am not seeing anything about this in mainstream media, and it should be a top story.

[sanatanadharma]

5. A single online site will arise to document stories

Something archival like sorryantivaxxer.com

RUSorryYetAliotoetal.criminal