General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsStates Most Dependent on the Federal Government - 2022 Edition
Billions of dollars are at stake each year for individual states when lawmakers in Washington D.C. negotiate the following years federal budget. For 2023, President Biden is calling for a 7% increase in federal spending as part of his $5.8 trillion budget proposal. While this money will ultimately play a major role in how states fund themselves, some states are more reliant on federal dollars than others. For example, Wyoming gets over 56% of its revenue from federal sources, but only 27% of Hawaiis revenue comes from the federal faucet. With this in mind, SmartAsset took a closer look at individual states to determine which ones are most dependent on the federal government.
To do this, we analyzed and compared data across the following metrics: federal share of state government revenue, ratio of federal funding to income taxes paid, percentage of workers employed by the federal government and ratio of median earnings for federal workers to median earnings for private workers. For details on our data sources and how we put all the information together to create our final rankings, read the Data and Methodology section below.
Red states dominate the top 10. Eight of the 10 states most dependent on the federal government traditionally vote Republican. New Mexico (No. 2) is the only state in the top 10 to vote for the Democratic candidate in any of the last six presidential elections. Maine (No. 8), which splits its delegates, has voted for both Democrats and Republicans in the recent elections.
On average, federal funding makes up about 39% of state revenues. However, this figure varies by a margin of more than 29 percentage points. The federal share of state government revenue is highest in Wyoming, at 56.43%, and lowest in Hawaii, at 27.13%.
Connecticut ranks as the state least reliant on the federal government. . .
States Most Dependent on the Federal Government
States are ranked according to four metrics. Hover over each state to see overall rank, federal share of state revenue and ratio of federal funding to income taxes paid.
1. West Virginia
No state is more dependent on the federal government than West Virginia, which gets 45.16% of its revenue from federal sources (the 10th-most). West Virginia receives 2.36-times more revenue from the federal government than its residents pay in income taxes, the third-highest ratio across our study. Meanwhile, 4.08% of workers in the state are employed by the federal government (the seventh-most), earning nearly double (1.99) what private, for-profit workers earn on average.
2. New Mexico
New Mexico has the fifth-largest percentage of workers employed by the federal government (6.06%). The ratio of federal funding to income taxes paid is 1.87, the fourth-highest for this metric. Meanwhile, the federal government supplies the state with 41.80% of its revenue.
3. Mississippi
For every $1 paid in income tax in Mississippi, the state takes in $2.53 in federal funding. Thats the second-largest ratio of federal funding to income taxes paid in our study. Meanwhile, 47.31% of state revenues come from federal funding, which is the seventh-highest percentage of all 50 states. Additionally, Mississippi has the 11th-largest percentage of workers employed by the federal government (3.23%).'>>>
https://smartasset.com/data-studies/states-most-dependent-on-the-federal-government-2022?
Lots here for us all to chew on, I'm sure.
multigraincracker
(32,714 posts)No surprises.
BigmanPigman
(51,626 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,403 posts)We owe everybody for inflicting Moscow Mitch and Random Piles on the nation.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,894 posts)The percentage of workers employed by the federal government includes the many who work at Sandia Labs, or Los Alamos National Las. Or the several air force bases here.
They are not simply recipients of federal largesse.
elleng
(131,077 posts)I didn't think they were.
PoindexterOglethorpe
(25,894 posts)that get a lot more money from the federal government than they give back in taxes. I just want to make it clear that a lot of that federal money goes to paychecks, not to some other support.
modrepub
(3,502 posts)Is to make more federal monies subject to state and local matches. To get federal money for a project, state and local government would have to put up some percentage of the project to get federal funds. You'd be surprised how many Republican politicians won't put up their own district's tax money even if they'd get multiple times the amount back from the federal government. If state or local governments don't want to put up their own money, then any left over can go to other state or local governments that would be willing to put their money up for their projects.
2naSalit
(86,769 posts)Current federally funded programs already require matching funds from the states. Mostly only farm subsidies and other land use entities get free money. Once that is addressed we can talk about handouts.
Also, all the states mentioned have large rural areas and/or Indian Reservations. I wonder if BIA funding is included in these estimates.
There are always underlying factors that are often hidden by omission.