General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsCan we stop referring to women by their husband's names when they do not use those names?
Look, I cannot stand Elaine Chao and do not hold much respect for Andrea Mitchell, but
Those are their names. Calling them "Mrs. Mitch McConnell" and "Mrs. Greenspan" is demeaning, dismissive and, yes, sexist.
Let's stop being sexist here on DU.
Thanks for reading.
Edited to add:
My point is not to say that women shouldn't take their husbands surnames, I did 37 years ago. That is a choice. It is when we use the man's surname when the woman in question does not. And when we use his first name "Mrs. Mitch McConnell" as well, when referring to the woman.
hlthe2b
(102,419 posts)mcar
(42,403 posts)Thanks.
CurtEastPoint
(18,668 posts)made in choosing a spouse. I find DU overall the least sexist place I know.
mcar
(42,403 posts)the men have influence over them. It is sexist and demeaning to dismiss and degrade women, any women, by referring to them as if they are their husband's chattel and they don't even have the right to the names of their choice.
mopinko
(70,268 posts)Takket
(21,644 posts)delisen
(6,046 posts)Never saw anyone call Greenspan Mr. Mitchell.
mcar
(42,403 posts)Referring to her by some other name does not do that.
obamanut2012
(26,158 posts)WTAF did I just read.
Caliman73
(11,752 posts)That does not mean that there aren't elements of sexism that we shouldn't be addressing. Look, we all grow up bathing in racism and sexism, ableism, ageism, etc... It comes out in weird ways that we may not even be conscious of. If someone calls it out, instead of reflexively defending whatever you feel about a situation, instead maybe question... look inward and ask, "Could that be construed as ....?" If so, then just understand though it was not your intention, that again, we are swimming in all that stuff all the time.
I am sure that Elaine Chao and Mitch McConnell influence each other in equal ways. Chao comes from a very wealthy and powerful family and McConnell has gone to the mat to make sure that spoils of government have gone the family. That is Elaine influencing Mitch, but we don't hear "Mr. Elaine Chao" comments about McConnell, we only hear the opposite about Chao and about Andrea Mitchell and her marriage to Alan Greenspan. The characterization as a "one way" influence from the man to the woman IS sexist framing.
mcar
(42,403 posts)Thank you.
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)gab13by13
(21,440 posts)I will delete my thread. Thanks for letting me know.
mcar
(42,403 posts)iemanja
(53,093 posts)That many feel far too confident in displaying.
It's far too casual.
Shrike47
(6,913 posts)Besides, a lot of women like to have the same last name as their children.
onecaliberal
(32,931 posts)mcar
(42,403 posts)It is not the choice of the two women I mentioned.
CrispyQ
(36,540 posts)SharonClark
(10,014 posts)husband considered changing his last name to your last name. Did he?
Its a good thing you didnt marry a second or third time and had kids with those husbands as well. So many last names to manage.
TigressDem
(5,125 posts)I am Mrs. Xyozson and so is my MIL. I don't think it's particularly dismissive unless using it when describing some award they won.
AND if someone has a doctorate... or special title.
But a person is a parent, an employee, a sibling, a spouse. Many hats. Many titles.
IF THE PERSON has an issue.... then it's an issue.
mcar
(42,403 posts)Again, these two women have chosen to not use their husband's names. Andrea Mitchell has been a journalist far longer than she's been married to Greenspan.
I took my husband's name when we married 37 years ago. If I were doing it again, I wouldn't. My choice. But I never liked being referred to as Mrs. man's name.
These 2 women, and many others, chose to not take their husband's surnames. To refer to them by those men's surnames serves no purpose but to demean them.
TigressDem
(5,125 posts)If these women expressed a preference, I am for it.
In general, I don't think it is meant in a dismissive manner automatically.
But yeah, if they are already well known, then use their proper name.
Like Dr Jill Biden.
SharonClark
(10,014 posts)TigressDem
(5,125 posts)But simply being referred to as being Mrs. So and So might not be dismissive to every married women. I am a very strong woman and proud of who I am. I also married a wonderful man and at times if someone calls me Mrs. W. SSDFD then I'm ok with it. Personally.
It might simply be how someone recognized who they were. But if people are doing it to be dismissive of someone's preference on purpose, then yes, wrong as hell.
Like I said before, it's a hat that person wears, not their person hood.
Mr.Bill
(24,334 posts)but when we got married she insisted on using my last name. I left the choice up to her.
What I think is a little creepy is when a couple gets divorced and the woman continues to use his name.
obamanut2012
(26,158 posts)It is her legal and personal name.
How ridiculous.
Mr.Bill
(24,334 posts)exactly what you are saying.
Arkansas Granny
(31,535 posts)and it was easier than having my name changed on everything.
Mr.Bill
(24,334 posts)I was thinking of a certain relative who only has one kid, who was long ago married and uses her husband's name. She had a really terrible divorce and I don't know how she can continue to use that name 15 years later.
Arkansas Granny
(31,535 posts)It was kind of rocky in the beginning, but we eventually reached the point where the kids didn't have to worry about which one of us to invite to family functions. His last wife and I were on friendly terms and I even got a mention in his obituary.
Mr.Bill
(24,334 posts)marybourg
(12,642 posts)childrens name, and maybe she is known in her industry/profession by that name. Having changed her name once, especially in this Patriot Act era, is enough for many women. Nothing creepy about it. Just practicality.
mopinko
(70,268 posts)but yeah. as someone who kept my own name through 2 hubs. dont even call me mrs unless you want a short, sharp lecture.
lisa58
(5,755 posts)Because he told me not to. I married you - not someone who needs to turn into me. Hes gone nearly 4 years- I couldnt love him more, but I will ❤️
niyad
(113,628 posts)choices. . . .the images rendered it unlikely that I will be eating dinner.
MLAA
(17,340 posts)I like the suggestion of putting spouses name in parentheses if / when you think it is pertinent to the post.
mcar
(42,403 posts)Skittles
(153,226 posts)no indeed
mcar
(42,403 posts)People here are doing that.
Skittles
(153,226 posts)one man "giving" his daughter away to another man, and she takes his name - it's crazy how many women go along with such sexist nonsense
mcar
(42,403 posts)still do it.
I did, 37 years ago, but wouldn't today.
My 2 nieces both took their husband's names. My DIL did not.
Skittles
(153,226 posts)then complain about inequality, I just want to shake them.....WAKE THE FUCK UP
mcar
(42,403 posts)I don't think we'd say the same re Chasten Buttigieg.
Skittles
(153,226 posts)it's ridiculous
mcar
(42,403 posts)gab13by13
(21,440 posts)I did not type Mrs. Alan Greenspan, I typed Mrs. Greenspan. I did not realize she never took her husband's last name.
For example, people on MSNBC still say Betsy Woodruff and some say Betsy Swan, and some say Betsy Woodruff/Swan. She doesn't seem to mind and I have no idea which she prefers.
mcar
(42,403 posts)"The Greenspan Report?" As I said earlier, she's been a journalist longer than she's been married to Greenspan.
Betsy's name is her choice. I've seen it as "Woodruff Swan." Her choice.
obamanut2012
(26,158 posts)I hate it, too.
No one says Mr. Elaine Chao, etc. Ever.
mcar
(42,403 posts)gulliver
(13,197 posts)Adults are entitled to throw shade on other adults. If, by calling Elaine Chao "Mrs. Mitch McConnell," you mean to imply she's under his thumb or vice versa, you're allowed to do that. If you're just trying to imply that she has no personal worth of her own and that she would be a nobody if she weren't married to Mitch McConnell, I think you're allowed to do that too. It's seldom a sexist jibe, imo. You'll hear people using the same formulation about men too. Some people might be offended when it occurs, but we all have to tolerate being offended off and on.
mcar
(42,403 posts)and have no recollection of anyone ever referring to a man by his wife's name. Ever.
I stand by my OP. It's sexist.
Mr.Bill
(24,334 posts)Or, althought I've never seen it here, calling Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie Brangelina.
mcar
(42,403 posts)as is Brangelina. Those are cutesy, celebrity-type nicknames.
It's quite a bit different than "Mrs. Jared Kushner" and "Mrs. Brad Pitt," isn't it?
Mr.Bill
(24,334 posts)BlueLucy
(1,609 posts)DFW
(54,448 posts)My wife, on this board, at least, remains "Mrs. DFW." I do not need her deluged with hate mail/calls instigated by Republican trolls who lurk here.
mcar
(42,403 posts)How would she, and you, feel if her user name on this board was Sue Jones, but people called her "Mrs. DFW?"
DFW
(54,448 posts)mcar
(42,403 posts)and you did say that on this board she was "Mrs. DFW" which led me to believe she does post here under that name.
I see that you meant you refer to her in that way.
Which really has nothing to do with my OP, does it?
DFW
(54,448 posts)Andrea Mitchell, Elaine Chao, and millions of other women, who also are not on DU, have chosen to not go by Mrs. followed by their husband's names.
When people on DU, or elsewhere, refer to those women only by Mrs. followed by their husband's name, they are denigrating and demeaning those women in a sexist manner.
Andrea Mitchell is a biased reporter. Elaine Chao is a corrupt Republican hack. See, it is possible for one to express one's opinion of a woman without resorting to sexist tactics.
That is the point of my OP. How you choose to reference your spouse here isn't.
Bluesaph
(719 posts)Of women keeping our names.
ecstatic
(32,748 posts)mcar
(42,403 posts)would be OK?